If you were doing your wife and got your nut first and just rolled over and went to sleep while she was still hot and bothered, how would she feel? Or better yet, if you were horny and not getting any and then learned that the reason you were in the "Deny Zone" is because she was using a damn vibrator, how would you feel?
Jason's actions were selfish. But I forgive him.
Scat is a synonym for uh...poo. There are some gay men (and probably straight couples too who are into that darker s***) that love to crap or pee on their partner during sex.
Which is udderly disgussing.
We need to take you out dancing!
Also, mrvlknight, you haven't heard that Pitbull song?
Thank you. It's not totally worked out. But we made some great progress. He did indeed recognize David. I had a picture still up in the bathroom on this little stand next to the jacuzzi that I failed to take down. We were taking a shower together and when he stepped out he pointed it out. Obviously this was not the first time he had probably seen it because it was the same bathroom he had *********ed in earlier. He said, "Is that your ex?" I was caught off guard like, "S***! I thought I took all the pics down". So of course, I said yes. I was a little nervous at that point because Jason said, "he looks familiar for some reason. What does he do?" I played it cool and simply said that he was also in "law enforcement." Technically, that was a white lie...but in away David does enforce the law--in the courtroom...even though I led Jason to believe that David's another cop.
It was the best I could do.
See, I have two guys who are closet homophobes. I am taking that into consideration in terms of how I'm handling their feelings. Eventually the entire details will be revealed. But for Jason, being told, "That's my ex. He's enforces the law also" is hardly misleading because David is a lawyer and his cases are designed to enforce it.
I know what I'm doing. LOL
To tell Jason that "something's going on" with David would've been worse and truly misleading. Why create a cloud of suspicion? I answered in questions in a brief sentence. And kept it that that. And he was fine with it.
Again, am I reading this wrong? Telling Jason (current) that David (ex) is a lawyer isnt telling him something is going on with him. Jason apparently assumed it was your ex, and asked....
Clearly there is nothing going on with David now. No harm there..
But Zink really has the crux of what's going on from my standpoint. It's about timing. I have every intention of shedding the full light on everything for both men...but in time. Jason has enough to deal with without knowing that he's sleeping with the ex of a lawyer he may run in the same circles with. That's confusing and he's already kinda paranoid. I don't need to add to that.
*sigh*
It is confusing to me that this of all things seems to be a stickler for you and Henchwench. And yet it wasn't for Jason or me. LOL
In terms of backtracking: Not at all. I see your point. But I am going by what I remember. With that one statement I probably did give the impression to Jason that David is a cop. Or a parole officer. Or a commissioner. Or one who answers the phones. LOL I simply did not go into specifics at this time. Is it a stretch? Maybe. I can understand where you and HenchWench are coming from. But at the time it seemed to be the right thing to do. By not going into specifics Jason will not be offended when I finally tell him exactly what David does. And you know what? If Jason pressed me further about it, I'd tell him.
Also, I disagree about what lawyers do. They pratice law in the courtroom to ensure that client's rights are protected, and that those who break the law are prosecuted and punished. By working in conjunction with the court system, they make sure that the law is upheld and enforced. Again, I don't see a deal-breaker, and I am confident that Jason wouldn't either.
Basically, I played it off.
It's cool.
And remember, this is all transpiring in a matter of days. For him, it's a lot to take in. Timing is everything. No worries.
t: (serious).
t:
I second whoever said whther it's New York, or whether it's your lifestyle, your life is WAY different than mine.
LOL I still don't get this statement though. No one will explain it to me. In what way? Unless you're gay wouldn't the lifestyle be way different anyway?
And thanks Schlosser.
