Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]387067[/split]
It makes more sense if you're going to do an Indiana Jones movie to at least have the protagonist named after the original character. It would allow them to keep the title and theme mostly intact but also allow it to adapt to whoever the new "Indiana" is.If they have a new protagonist why does that person have to be related to Indiana Jones?
hypocrite
Yes, yes I do. Especially if Lucas isn't involved.Do we even really want a fifth movie after the fourth one?
What about Spielberg? His heart did not seem to be in the last film at all.Yes, yes I do. Especially if Lucas isn't involved.
Spielberg can still direct very well, and I felt like his work on the last film was quite good.What about Spielberg? His heart did not seem to be in the last film at all.
Spielberg can still direct very well, and I felt like his work on the last film was quite good.
I don't get some of the hate Shia gets either. Granted, the story sucked and they really shouldn't have done that monkey swing sequence but apart from that, he wasn't bad.
Especially now that he seems to have turned a corner and is doing movies like Fury, would people be more open to him or is Crystal Skull too much baggage?
Yes, yes I do. Especially if Lucas isn't involved.
I just don't see Shia as a good candidate to fill Ford's shoes. Of course that guy (or gal) may not exist. I would consider piggy backing on the Star Wars spinoffs and hiring the young Han Solo actor to portray Henry Jones III.
You can keep Ford, while having the main narrative center around a younger Indiana Jones in flashbacks. Make old Indy pretty much be retired and close to the one we saw in the Young Indiana Jones Chronicles show, maybe even end the film with him wearing an eye-patch. Anyway, Lucasfilm will probably start production on this only after Episode IX, or near it's release.