Interstellar - Part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
OZ4Yh1d.jpg

See here that TARS is written on the closing door.

This is good news to me. :awesome:
 
The original script has about 70% in space but I think they expanded the Earth scenes so who know now how much are the space scenes.

You've read the script? How is it?
 
Is Jessica Chastain playing the grown up version of the little girl? And if so does this mean that Mathew's character is gone for many years, cause that is awesome and scientifically accurate. For him no time at all would pass but for his kids it would be like he was gone for a very long time.
 
Hide what?

Who [BLACKOUT]Chastain[/BLACKOUT] is playing.

If you want to know:
She's Murph.

Also worth nothing...

Time travels differently in space so...

Is Jessica Chastain playing the grown up version of the little girl? And if so does this mean that Mathew's character is gone for many years, cause that is awesome and scientifically accurate. For him no time at all would pass but for his kids it would be like he was gone for a very long time.

Bingo.

:D

You've read the script? How is it?

Just the first version (the one written solely by Jonah). I liked it for the most part. It's very Spielberg in a good way IMO.
 
This is a point I've been trying to make for years but no one listens. :oldrazz:

Wally is talented, but Nolan has a distinctive visual style in all of his movies. He shot Following on his own and with literally no budget other than the film stock. Yet it has the same visual feel to it as the movies Wally shot with millions of dollars. Wally is a talented guy, but look at Moneyball. Visual appearance is much weaker than his work with Nolan.

I think this is the one area where Nolan is actually underrated as a filmmaker. He knows what he wants and he consistently gets great results in this area, whether he shoots it himself or has someone else do it.


Agree on most of it, but hum, Moneyball looks superb visually (having seen it 6 times, it's pretty much burned in my memory), and it's a given that a DP's work will be different depending on the director he works with.

It's true though that overall, Nolan is underrated from a visual point of view.
 
Who [BLACKOUT]Chastain[/BLACKOUT] is playing.

If you want to know:
She's Murph.

Also worth nothing...

Time travels differently in space so...

Edit: Its really awesome that Nolan is doing that.
 
Trailer starts a bit abruptly but other than that it looks like it's going to be one heck of a ride.
 
Moneyball looks superb visually (having seen it 6 times, it's pretty much burned in my memory)

I dunno, it just looked a bit too glossy for my taste. I will say for Wally that his own visual sensibility seems to lean more towards Nolan's style than what he did for Moneyball. Transcendence is a lot closer to Inception in visual appearance than Moneyball, no doubt about it.
 
This is a very relevant movie for our times. At the rate our species is reproducing we will run out of resources. When that happens very bad things will happen on this planet. We cant stay on this planet forever.
 
Trailer didn't do much for me. The subject matter seems to serious and grand to be presented in such a small and intimate manner. At least that's what I got from the trailer. I know nothing of the script or whatnot, so I'm sure I could be wrong. I don't know, overall it just isn't clicking or intriguing me as Nolan's other films have.
 
Nolan is underrated visually, but when it comes to action he's still not very good.
 
Trailer didn't do much for me. The subject matter seems to serious and grand to be presented in such a small and intimate manner. At least that's what I got from the trailer. I know nothing of the script or whatnot, so I'm sure I could be wrong. I don't know, overall it just isn't clicking or intriguing me as Nolan's other films have.

Based on the trailer I wouldnt call this film small at all. Intimate, yes, in that it deals with the survival of our species but not small. Nolan just chose to focus on one family. The family of the main character. Their struggles will inform you on the state of the rest of the species.
 
Last edited:
The action in Inception was not very good?

Some of it was good, some of it was "eh." The story is definitely much better than the action scenes. Not like Terminator 2 where the story was pretty good, but the action was probably even better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,348
Messages
22,089,868
Members
45,886
Latest member
Elchido
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"