James Bond In Skyfall - Part 5

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's ****ing brilliant news. Cant wait.

In fact, kudos to whoever came up with the idea and had the balls to suggest it. Actually kudos to anyone and everyone instrumental in making it happen.
 
Thank you, too, CS. I don't think I can afford all of them (and I don't have enough space in my house), so I'll go for the Fleming ones and those you recommended as good. Definitely not the Young Bond novels. Nope, no siree.

No Young Bond? Are you crazy? Those are the second best books in series behind Ian. They have been begging Higson for years to write an adult Bond novel. He is one of the few who "gets" Bond. He can use small hints that Ian drops in books about Bond's past and fleshes them out into entire stories that illuminate quite well.

Not only that, but YB is the only one that didnt change a thing, from timeline to the type of car his dad left for James (Bentley, not Aston). YB and Ian's books actually flow from one to the other quite naturally too.

Actually seeing James grow up top be the intelligent man of action he is. See him excel at track, shooting, swimming, all the stuff they mention Bond is good at but we never see him do or how he learned it.
 
Wow those stunt drivers are really precise. It's insane how well they maneuver a car.
 
They need Bond at the Olympics to kill all those would be terrorists.

Higson was good in the Fast Show back in the day.

Lol at that extra strutting in the Tube station.
 
Last edited:
They need Bond at the Olympics to kill all those would be terrorists.

Higson was good in the Fast Show back in the day.

Lol at that extra strutting in the Tube station.

Haha yeah that's really **** walking from that extra....lol
 
Bond is opening the Olympics in what way exactly?
 
Being given his mission objectives by her royal highness, queen Elizabeth the 2nd.
 
"We haven't been resting on our laurels, we've been plotting what to do with this film," Craig told the BBC. "The first one was a whirr - it was a new experience and flew by - the second one was the tricky second album, but this one we've really planned and got a great script. It's going to be different from the last one, but it will still be a great Bond movie."

"I know there'll be someone after me, and hopefully someone after them - I'm just trying to keep [the series] going. I'll keep going until they tell me to stop."

Location footage as well here:
http://www.mi6-hq.com/sections/articles/bond_23_video_apr03_bbc.php3?s=bond23&id=03129
 
Awesome pieces of footage there, can't wait till we get the first trailer.
 
No Young Bond? Are you crazy? Those are the second best books in series behind Ian. They have been begging Higson for years to write an adult Bond novel. He is one of the few who "gets" Bond. He can use small hints that Ian drops in books about Bond's past and fleshes them out into entire stories that illuminate quite well.

Not only that, but YB is the only one that didnt change a thing, from timeline to the type of car his dad left for James (Bentley, not Aston). YB and Ian's books actually flow from one to the other quite naturally too.

Actually seeing James grow up top be the intelligent man of action he is. See him excel at track, shooting, swimming, all the stuff they mention Bond is good at but we never see him do or how he learned it.

See, for some reason whenever I hear Young [Insert Hero here], my mind goes to the James Bond Jr. animated series, or to Hannibal Rising or something. Glad to hear the books are good. I'll start with the Fleming ones (naturally) and then go to the YB ones. I'll leave the reast for later.

Also, I was bored at work yesterday and decided to look at the older threads of JB23. A discussion about Thunderball caught my eye, where JAK echoed my opinion about that film: He didn't like it at all. A few posters told him to watch it again and even gave some insight on why they disagreed. I watched it yesterday and I have to say, it is one of the better Connery Bond films. However, that only applies whenever he's out of the sea. The underwater scenes drag like hell. The movie should've been 20 minutes shorter. Other than that, Connery was brilliant in it. So was the direction and the action.
 
See, for some reason whenever I hear Young [Insert Hero here], my mind goes to the James Bond Jr. animated series, or to Hannibal Rising or something. Glad to hear the books are good. I'll start with the Fleming ones (naturally) and then go to the YB ones. I'll leave the reast for later.

Also, I was bored at work yesterday and decided to look at the older threads of JB23. A discussion about Thunderball caught my eye, where JAK echoed my opinion about that film: He didn't like it at all. A few posters told him to watch it again and even gave some insight on why they disagreed. I watched it yesterday and I have to say, it is one of the better Connery Bond films. However, that only applies whenever he's out of the sea. The underwater scenes drag like hell. The movie should've been 20 minutes shorter. Other than that, Connery was brilliant in it. So was the direction and the action.

I certainly agree about this. I was one of the people who pointed this out before. Those scenes are dated. The only reason the underwater scenes dragged was to show (or to be more honest, show off) the technology of shooting underwater. I'm not really that big a fan of the underwater action.

Personally, of the Connery movies, I still say From Russia With Love and Goldfinger are way better, but I think it's better than the other Connery movies, even Dr. No.
 
Yes,TB epitomised Bond mania and is definitely one of the best and a personal favourite.
 
Yes, definitely. To this day, when adjusted for inflation, it is the high grossing Bond movie. To me, it had three things going for it at the time (in no order).

1. It's a good movie
2. It's a sequel to Goldfinger, a great movie.
3. The underwater scenes, which at the time were groundbreaking.
 
My top 2 Connery Bond films are also FRWL and GF and as of yesterday, I'm considering placing TB above Dr. No.

And Parker Wayne, I agree with everything you said as a reply to my post. John Barry definitely wrote a badass underwater theme for TB, though.
 
Yes, definitely. To this day, when adjusted for inflation, it is the high grossing Bond movie. To me, it had three things going for it at the time (in no order).

1. It's a good movie
2. It's a sequel to Goldfinger, a great movie.
3. The underwater scenes, which at the time were groundbreaking.

Indeed. Thunderball is brilliant. It's got great dialogue and a generally cool atmosphere.

I love James Bond movies. They're fun to watch. I have all of the UE DVDs, but can't wait for the blu-ray box set.
 
I can't really deside what I'm more disappointed with, You only live twice or Diamonds are Forever I think it was because both in their own ways were meant to follow on from On her majesty's secret service and neither delivered.

YOLT I liked originally but in hindsight it just seems like a wasted opportunity, the Novel was so much better than what we got.
And DAF was the return of Connery, following up a great story that should have left Bond in a interesting place for the filmmakers to use, but the campy tone just killed it.
 
I think DAF is decidedly worse than YOLT. YOLT is still a well shot film (mostly) and, despite its silliniess, it has elements that make it a classic. DAF has absolutely nothing.
 
Yeah it's not so much that I dislike the film itself (Pleasence is my fav Blofeld), it's just that after reading the book, which is really an extremely personal revenge story, the film doesn't really measure up to the novel it was based on.
 
From what I've heard ChickenScratch say over the years (days for me, I've been reading those threads 2 days straight, I'm THAT bored), though, the movies completely messed up the novels in every possible way, including the chronologies. So, that the YOLT movie was only superficially similar to the book must have been expected, no?
 
From what I've heard ChickenScratch say over the years (days for me, I've been reading those threads 2 days straight, I'm THAT bored), though, the movies completely messed up the novels in every possible way, including the chronologies. So, that the YOLT movie was only superficially similar to the book must have been expected, no?

Yup, pretty much. There is one ongoing narrative that essentially starts with Ian (though in story it starts with Higson's YB) and goes all the way up to about 94 when Gardner left. What the movies basically did was take these, do them out of order, take pit the stuff that leads from one story into the next and basically freeze the character to one point in his career.
 
http://www.rtve.es/noticias/2012040...y-hacer-pasar-canutas-james-bond/513667.shtml

Translation

Bardem: It’s being a very beautiful and fun adventure. One has to enjoy it, one does it because of that. It’s many things. First it’s a James Bond film. I am 43 years old and since I was very little I remember watching Dr. No, and Moonraker with my parents. I remember hallucinating with Jaws biting the cable of the cable car.
Then it’s a picture that celebrates 50 years of James Bond, it’s directed by Sam Mendes, yesterday I was on set with Albert Finney, with Judi Dench, with Daniel Craig.
Journalist: I’m envying you more and more.
Bardem: It’s cool, and the coolest thing and what’s most important is the material. When I got it and saw the character. Immediately you forget a little that it is a James Bond film and you realize that it is a great film and that’s what attracted me. I said man this gives you a lot of possibilities. Obviously it’s a James Bond film and it has everything you expect from a Bond film.
Journalist: Martinis, women, Aston Martin?
Bardem: (nodding his head agreeing) Obviously. But besides that there is a super-powerful story and a character with meat to put your teeth in and enjoy doing.
Journalist: I imagine that evidently very little can be said about this Silva. All we have seen is a photo where you are blond. What is this coincidence of strange hair styles and characters in the limit. Is this a strategy used by directors or a coincidence?
Bardem: No, it’s because I’m so good that they have to give me these hair styles to remind me that I’m bad. No, what happens is that I can’t tell much about it but it has to do with the character . I don’t know, there is also something that Sam, the director, told me a short while and he was right: James Bond films are midway between reality and fiction. Therefore is a very good and very fertile terrain to play the characters with a certain freedom. It has to do with a real situation and there has got to be seriousness playing it but it’s more open, it gives you more air so that you can work and imagine more. And that is very fun because you’re not doing absolute fiction, it’s not a superhero picture, but it’s not a completely down-to-earth film. It’s something in the middle that’s very good and very fun for an actor.
Journalist: Well, we’ve talked about Jaws, and others that gave Bond a hard time. I’m sure that Silva will do that to.
Bardem: That has been my decision, I’m completely decided to give him a hard time and the truth is that I get to do it. On script, doing it in the set is a different thing. The character puts Bond into some curious and interesting difficulties and one has to do it, and give the ideal that you are the villain. Otherwise there is no point in doing it. You have to put the actor in a difficult situation, that’s the objective. In that sense Sam is helping a lot, he’s an amazing director. And I’m delighted to be working with Daniel, he’s a guy with balls, he’s a really hard working guy, super-compromised with what he’s doing. For him it’s stenuous, six months of shooting everyday, in addition with a lot of physical demand and the guy holds on super-compromised. He’s an actor who is doing some amazing scenes. As an actor I look at that and I say great, and like it. And then he’s very much a clown, which I love, the moment they say cut. And he’s a guy who brings a lot of humour and a lot of lightness to the thing because obviously these are very long days and and for him it must be, it is difficult. So it’s an amazing experience!
 
Greek model and actress Tonia Sotiropoulou announced on Facebook that she got a role in SKYFALL.


This image has been resized to fit in the page. Click to enlarge.


She wrote:
"Dear friends, I officially announce that I got a role in the next James Bond film. Turkey, here I come! Thank you all for your love and support. This is the happiest day of my life!"



She talked to Tlife.gr and revealed more about her role in the film.

- When do you start filming?
- They started shooting the film in October. I have a small role, three scenes. I'm playing his lover. I start filming on April 22 and it will be for 5 days. It will be in Turkey.

- Could you tell us a bit more about your role? (**SPOILERS**)
- I play James Bond's lover, who somehow helps him to escape when everyone thinks he's dead. It's a small part, two or three scenes, I'm not sure how long it will be.

- How are you feeling?
- It's the happiest day of my life so far! I feel very very lucky and blessed. I'm really grateful it happened. I'm grateful for my friends and family who believe in me and support my efforts. I'll do my best! I'm very proud because it's something that may promote Greece and that makes me happy. As far as I know, no other Greeks have been in a Bond film before.
(NOTE: she clearly has no idea about Telly Savalas or For Your Eyes Only...)

- How is Daniel Craig?
- He's very nice! He's funny, pleasant, kind, and very down-to-earth. Of course I don't know him well yet...

- Were there a lot of other girls auditioning for your role?
- Yes, there were many candidates. At first I auditioned for the main part in August, but I didn't get it. Bérénice Marlohe got it, a wonderful French actress. Then the casting director told me they liked me and they would inform me if they found a part I could get. So I auditioned on Friday and yesterday they called me, I went to the studio where they're filming, met the director, talked about the scene and he said I got the role!


mv5bmtu3mdeznzeznf5bml5.jpg


toniaz3.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
lol the MI6 site list her as his girlfriend which I thought was really cool, and would have been a genius idea considering his... lifestyle... sad to see role is probably just a onenightstand
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"