Justice League Status Updates Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wonder Woman doesn't really need a movie. She could easily be introduced in Justice League or an adaptation of Trinity.


Agreed.

Wonder Woman could be the "Black Widow" of the Justice League movie.

The only female in the group but she can kick butt and handle herself


A solo movie would just fail at the box office. There hasn't been a successful superhero female movie ever.

Women action heroes are poison in the minds of film studios


My line up would be

Batman
Superman
Wonder woman
Flash
Green Lantern

That's it. Anymore and it might be crowded.
 
Then again, the "Justice League" would seem like an Avengers ripoff as well.

"Justice League" does sound a little hokey and cheese than Avengers.

Yet the quality of the movie could prove otherwise.
 
Agreed.

Wonder Woman could be the "Black Widow" of the Justice League movie.

The only female in the group but she can kick butt and handle herself


A solo movie would just fail at the box office. There hasn't been a successful superhero female movie ever.

Women action heroes are poison in the minds of film studios


My line up would be

Batman
Superman
Wonder woman
Flash
Green Lantern

That's it. Anymore and it might be crowded.

no. she's not. she's a part of the big three. to say she's the black widow of the league is kinda sexist. she's more thor than widow.
 
Then again, the "Justice League" would seem like an Avengers ripoff as well.

Critics will always say that no matter when a Justice League movie gets made.

My line up would be

Batman
Superman
Wonder woman
Flash
Green Lantern

That's it. Anymore and it might be crowded.

Five heroes are sufficient.

"Justice League" does sound a little hokey and cheese than Avengers.
Fury never called team of superheroes as Avengers, he called the plan of them coming together as "Avengers Initiative".

Similarly, team of five superheroes could be called as The League which stands for Truth and Justice.

The news media later calls them as "Justice League".

Wonder Woman could be the "Black Widow" of the Justice League movie.

Wonder Woman deserves a solo movie, if they just introduce her as a member of Justice League, then I would be okay with that as long as they plan to make a solo requel movie on her.

Otherwise just don't include her as a token female member (like Black Widow), just include some other like - Black Canary / Huntress / hawkgirl / Vixen.
 
Last edited:
Really, Batman and Superman give you enough to work with. Just throw in Flash or Green Lantern. Wonder Woman if you must. And possibly another token female characters.

As for the name, people are familiar with it. It works fine.
 
Black Widow was amazing in the movie, hopefully Wonder Woman gets treated the same as she did, a capable ass kicking woman, except Wonder Woman would have powers.
 
Marvel will get to Avengers II before JL ever comes together. We're getting Thanos and his mythology.


Darkseid would seem like a major ripoff. Then again, the "Justice League" would seem like an Avengers ripoff as well.

the irony is darkseid came before thanos and JL came before avengers.
 
And Green lantern was created in 1959, yet critics call it a Star wars rip off that was created in 1977.
 
Older Bird should get the worm. :o

Then go get it, plenty of worms out there :yay: I'd like to see it.

How long has WB owned DC? What were they waiting for? No faith, no vision. An independent studio had both for it's characters and took a chance. They are being rewarded and are now owned by Disney.
 
People are always talking about this rip-off thing, but I don't think the General Audience cares that much.
 
That's different. John Carter created several tropes that were used in countless sci-fi movies before the actual movie was released, so, it was deemed unoriginal.

There's no sharing tropes between the two teams other than the fact they're a team of superheroes and some characters have similar looks and/or powers.
 
From BOM on TA's uber-success:

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=3435&p=.htm

The 2012 Summer movie season officially gets underway this weekend with what is easily one of the biggest releases of the year. After five movies that in many ways functioned as prequel material, some of Marvel's most-popular superheroes finally team up in The Avengers, which has the seventh-widest opening ever at 4,349 locations. Thanks to these lead-in movies and a killer marketing campaign, anticipation has reached nearly-unprecedented levels, and The Avengers is a lock to score one of the highest opening weekends of all-time.

While the notion of a superhero team-up is fairly common in comic books, it's been a difficult thing to arrange on the big screen. DC Comics has tried for many years to assemble Batman, Superman, and a handful of other characters in a Justice League movie, but that has had numerous false starts and is currently on the backburner. Considering none of the characters had ever had a very successful big-screen incarnation, the prospects for Marvel's The Avengers didn't seem much better.

That all changed in May 2008. Long thought of as a second-tier comic book character, Iron Man surprised many when it opened to $98.6 million. Thanks to strong word-of-mouth (due in no small part to Robert Downey, Jr.'s charismatic lead performance), the movie went on to earn $318.4 million, which at the time made it the highest-grossing comic book adaptation that didn't involve Spider-Man.

Iron Man's extraordinary success made The Avengers a viable option, and even after The Incredible Hulk earned an underwhelming $134.8 million, Marvel still moved ahead with bringing the other elements of the franchise to life. Though it was a bit of a creative disappointment, the sequel to Iron Man earned $312.4 million in 2010, and then last year Thor and Captain America: The First Avenger scored a fine $181 million and $176.6 million, respectively.

Aside from actually making money, these five Marvel movies have served as the most elaborate and expensive marketing campaign of all-time. That alone is enough to get fanboys all hot-and-bothered for The Avengers, and Disney's marketing team has done a fantastic job making this a must-see for general audiences as well. Previews establish the movie's high stakes and extraordinary nature by showing that a global threat has forced this dysfunctional team of superheroes together. They also pack in plenty of conflict, comedy (mostly from Downey, Jr.), and tons of outrageous action. Also, while it probably doesn't matter too much for a movie of this size, more discerning audiences may be swayed by a strong 92 percent fresh rating on review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes.


Note that BOM mentions the previus 5 Marvel movies as being the most elaborate marketing campaign of all time. This is eexactly why WB can't nw rush headlong into a JL film. If it disappoints then DC properties at WB will be on hold for a long time to come.
 
I say wait two years after MOS is released. Then do a Worlds finest that acts as a Set-up. Then do a JL movie.

Jon Hamm as SM
Billy Crudup as BM
Nathan Fillion as GL
Ryan Kwanton as Flash
Gina Carano as WW
 
I'll be DC VS Marvel in one respect: A well executed Darkseid/Apokolips/Crisis storyline would kick the crap out of a well executed Thanos portrayal. Not worried about people who cry rip off. They're just ignorant of the characters.
 
The chances of a well executed Darkseid storyline are practically non-existent. The only well excuted stuff to come from WB/DC is Nolan's work, and he doesn't even believe in the Justice League concept.


Marvel has a much better chance of delivering a well executed Thanos Avengers sequel. They have everything going for them at Marvel Studios and all the right people involved.
 
The early bird gets the worm.

This.
It doesn't matter in the eyes of the General Audience what hero's came first, the fact Avengers came out first on the big screen would dictate JLA as a ripoff.

However; if done right it wouldn't matter ppl would see it just for Batman/Superman. I think u could still have WW in it even w/o having an origin story for her(no law says u have too).
Far as what type of bad guy to have you could almost do the same formula or just have one major bad guy and a couple of powerful henchmen. You could bring in some baddies from GL worlds, plus one of Supermans, but you would also have to have something/someone Batman could handle.
 
Agreed.

Wonder Woman could be the "Black Widow" of the Justice League movie.

The only female in the group but she can kick butt and handle herself


A solo movie would just fail at the box office. There hasn't been a successful superhero female movie ever.

Women action heroes are poison in the minds of film studios


My line up would be

Batman
Superman
Wonder woman
Flash
Green Lantern

That's it. Anymore and it might be crowded.


And yet franchises like Underworld, Resident Evil, and The Hunger Games seem to do fine.
 
Really, Batman and Superman give you enough to work with. Just throw in Flash or Green Lantern. Wonder Woman if you must. And possibly another token female characters.

As for the name, people are familiar with it. It works fine.

A WF film is good enough, do not really need a JL film.
 
The chances of a well executed Darkseid storyline are practically non-existent. The only well excuted stuff to come from WB/DC is Nolan's work, and he doesn't even believe in the Justice League concept.


Marvel has a much better chance of delivering a well executed Thanos Avengers sequel. They have everything going for them at Marvel Studios and all the right people involved.

That's because Nolan is a stubborn ass, and an idiot with regards to this.

And The Avengers proves it. There's nothing about the Avengers and those characters that makes them any more friendly to a cinematic team-up than the Justice League's characters.
 
If nothing else TA maybe will force WB to decide what it really wants to do with it's DC staple of properties.

To date WB has not had a clear vision of what to do with all these characters.

Marvel Studios has proven that a focused, planned out vision can lead to critically acclaimed superhero films that also make buck.

Is that what WB wants? if so their model has to change. If WB is going to copy Disney/Marvel don't do it by rushing out a JL film in the wake of TA, do it by creating a DC Studios subsidiary. Independent and tasked with one goal - bring DC's properties to life on the big and small screen.

If WB doesn't want to go this route then be open about it. Focus on Batman's reboot and putting out DC films every so often But step back from trying to be a key player in the superhero film business.
 
I do actually think that a Batman Superman crossover would be better than a Justice League movie. Better in the sense that it's harder to **** up, and easier to make commercially viable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"