Man of Steel Box Office Prediction Thread - - - - Part 13

Status
Not open for further replies.
WHOA really? Damn... that's not a good sign...

It's a good sign if someone like Alfonso Cuaron or Brad Bird ends up directing Star Wars.

I don't trust JJ Abram's to set the tone and style for the next 3 Star Wars movie.

His one and only claim to fame was Nu Trek.
 
Looking at this weeks box office charts..
WB really should have give MOS Prim's spot.

I hope Rim get's a sequel otherwise...
 
Yes. I remember Iron Man and its direct sequel Iron Man 2/Avengers!


As for the JJ rumor, I hope it's true. Because with JJ I know exactly what I am getting from an aesthetic and directing standpoint. With someone else, I might get an interesting take on Star Wars. Perhaps David Fincher can get a crack at it now that he is probably not doing 20,000 Leagues.

Zack Snyder for Episode 7! :o JJ can do the MOS sequel. :o
 
It's a good sign if someone like Alfonso Cuaron or Brad Bird ends up directing Star Wars.

I don't trust JJ Abram's to set the tone and style for the next 3 Star Wars movie.

His one and only claim to fame was Nu Trek.

I assume you prefer Brid's ghost protocol to abrams MI3?
 
It's a good sign if someone like Alfonso Cuaron or Brad Bird ends up directing Star Wars.

I don't trust JJ Abram's to set the tone and style for the next 3 Star Wars movie.

His one and only claim to fame was Nu Trek.

He also did MI3.
 
Yes. I remember Iron Man and its direct sequel Iron Man 2/Avengers!


As for the JJ rumor, I hope it's true. Because with JJ I know exactly what I am getting from an aesthetic and directing standpoint. With someone else, I might get an interesting take on Star Wars. Perhaps David Fincher can get a crack at it now that he is probably not doing 20,000 Leagues.

Don't forget Thor and the Hulk. lol
 
In my opinion Avengers sucked lots of diseased buffalo ****.

Goyer and Snyder are potentially more than a match for Whedon.


Goyer/Snyder>Whedon

WF will raise the bar...you'll see.

Yet Whedon's movie made more than double Goyer/Snyder's movie in the BO, not to mention had a 36% better rating on Rotten Tomatoes.

92% RT and 1.5B Box Office vs. 56% RT and 635M Box Office (and growing)



You're right Conan, Goyer/Snyder > Whedon. :whatever:
 
[,QUOTE=dalonewolf;26433279]if the new batman confuse anybody in the audience that's proof that most people really dont know what thier are looking at these movies are made for those who know whats is going on and are comic book fans
I really believe in my heart that the recent batman movies will give this batman an advantage rather than hurt the next batman everyone pretty much got the bad batman movies out of thier heads now
and bales lagecy have made batman a factor to all including marvel[/QUOTE]

I just hope Snyder gives Batman some bad ass suit like the Arkham City or Injustice suit. The biggest thing now is who is playing Lex, the Batman, and the villain
 
One thing I will give MOS is the suit. If they can modify the classic Batman suit as they did with Superman's... The movie will at least look good if it doesn't preform.

Imagine Bats with the CGI cape Supes had? Wow.
 
In my opinion Avengers sucked lots of diseased buffalo ****.

Goyer and Snyder are potentially more than a match for Whedon.


Goyer/snyder>Whedon

WF will raise the bar...you'll see.

I just...
How can you say....
But...

tumblr_m3eo9wj1jz1qbaywxo1_400.gif

*love Jerry today*
 
Yet Whedon's movie made more than double Goyer/Snyder's movie in the BO, not to mention had a 36% better rating on Rotten Tomatoes.

92% RT and 1.5B Box Office vs. 56% RT and 635M Box Office (and growing)



You're right Conan, Goyer/Snyder > Whedon. :whatever:

Whedon cannot tell a story. Avengers was huge because it had 5 movies hyping it up. Of course people were going to turn out in masses. It was a visual blockbuster. Plot and acting were all terrible aside from RDJ. Goyer does way better with ideas and others help at times but he has MOS under his belt so the sequel should flow better
 
I've heard of Ultron but I don't really know who he is or why he's so important.

but I definitely know who Superman and Batman are!!! :woot:
ultron is a machine built by Tony stark to help the world but it turns on him and killed almost every hero in tge world including the x-men the next avengers who is the kids of the avengers defeated him alone with the hulk and iron man the only 2 heros left that is the only story inhave heard of for ultron
 
Yet Whedon's movie made more than double Goyer/Snyder's movie in the BO, not to mention had a 36% better rating on Rotten Tomatoes.

92% RT and 1.5B Box Office vs. 56% RT and 635M Box Office (and growing)

You're right Conan, Goyer/Snyder > Whedon. :whatever:

I didn't need the facts and figures, as I know this already. In my opinion it sucked, have a look at the previous post.:cwink:
 
Whedon cannot tell a story. Avengers was huge because it had 5 movies hyping it up. Of course people were going to turn out in masses. It was a visual blockbuster. Plot and acting were all terrible aside from RDJ. Goyer does way better with ideas and others help at times but he has MOS under his belt so the sequel should flow better

You do realise that is a minority opinion. A lot of people legitimately liked the Avengers because they thought it was a good movie.

Dark of the Moon was also a blockbuster. Where were all the glowing reviews and WOM for that one? Same with MOS. I actually liked both those movies but what you are saying is ridiculous.
 
Last edited:
All of this.

Yea I mentioned this on other movie sites that Ultron will hurt A2 in that he is not a well known character to non comic readers. And even some comic readers don't know him. The GA won't relate to him easily at all. The only selling point will be Vin Diesel if the rumor of him voicing Ultron is true.
 
Yea I mentioned this on other movie sites that Ultron will hurt A2 in that he is not a well known character to non comic readers. And even some comic readers don't know him. The GA won't relate to him easily at all. The only selling point will be Vin Diesel if the rumor of him voicing Ultron is true.

Plot Twist: TA2 is actually Fast 7... In space.
 
I think people stopped caring after the WF announcement. :funny:

When it comes to BO, all I care about is

a) The movie makes enough for a sequel (and MoS has done that)

and

b) The movie makes enough to warrant a big budget (and WB are going to spare no expense for their tent pole movie)


above and beyond that it's all gravy and bragging rights.
 
The Avengers was a great film.
But again ya'll film is subjective. I've talked to people who vehemently hate TDK.
 
You do realise that the first half of your paragraph is a minority opinion. A lot of people legitimately liked the Avengers because they thought it was a good movie.

I never said it wasn't good. Most GA loved it. But it wasn't a great movie. Loki was horrible, nothing like his Thor and Thor 2 appearance. The plot was terrible and predictable. The movie was a cheesy one liner filled action fest. Popcorn fun
 
Yea I mentioned this on other movie sites that Ultron will hurt A2 in that he is not a well known character to non comic readers. And even some comic readers don't know him. The GA won't relate to him easily at all. The only selling point will be Vin Diesel if the rumor of him voicing Ultron is true.

Oh yeah, because Loki was the most popular CB villain of all time before the Avengers. :o You know nothing about Ultron if you believe nobody can relate to him.
 
its clesr to me that joss weldon is trying to knock all of dc plans
he heard of tye justice league movie so he wants to put quick silver in the next avengers only because of
the Flash speedster and speedster
and form what im hearing braniac wil be in mos2.
so hes using ultron A.I and A.I he wants everyone to say that dc copied but we all know that stan lee worked at dc before marvel ever got off the ground so really a lot of dc characters are copied at marvel
 
I'm with Joe on pretty much everything.

And he's right about Marvel too. Their films may vary in quality but the handling of their shared film universe has been nothing short of spectacular. In fact their foundation is so strong at this point they can even afford a bad movie or two. As long as they keep churning out an Avengers crossover every 2-3 years, that's really all they need. Those are the ones that need to deliver. I thought Thor was formulaic and forgettable but guess what, I was excited to see him in The Avengers.

And forget it. If by some miracle they find a way to bridge the Spiderman movies into that universe? Wow. That would be something. WB really needs to learn a thing or two. And I'll tell you another thing. Snyder and Goyer aren't the answer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"