The Dark Knight Rises OFFICIAL: Batman in the Burgh - Part 10

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm guessing that it's the Catwoman cowl since he said to "trust Subaru" and that's really the only scoop that Subaru can't really reveal.
 
Yeah, I'd say the most unanimous uproar was in regards to the Cat-Cowl.
 
Sure, but the steadiest is for the TDK suit. We'll see, it could be either.
 
Eyewitness sightings of Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Christopher Nolan - Station Square

http://***********/#!/musicbyJ/status/103904703812870144
 
Sure, but the steadiest is for the TDK suit. We'll see, it could be either.

It would be fantastic if it's a new Batsuit but I'm not getting my hopes up... :o
 
It would be fantastic if it's a new Batsuit but I'm not getting my hopes up... :o

Heh, the only reason I want a new suit is just for the sake of getting something new, as in variety of suits throughout the trilogy. Since I like the TDK suit, I'm hoping for a cat cowl.
 
If it could only be one, would you rather have Catwoman cowl or new batsuit?
 
Joe seems to be in a whole lot more scenes than I initially expected. And that's not a bad thing. Heck, he probably shot more scenes since last week than Bale or Hardy. I noticed that Bale's and Hardy's scenes were all during the 1st week (CMU for Bale, CMU and Heinz for Hardy) and they've been MIA since.
 
So, is this new scoop a cowl for Catwoman, a new Batsuit, new Batmobile, or something to do with the story? Only a matter of time....

The one I highlighted in bold is what I'm betting on. August 5th we got the Catwoman reveal; August 11th we got the Batplane; this week I'm guessing it's another new vehicle for Batman.
 
If it could only be one, would you rather have Catwoman cowl or new batsuit?

A new suit would actually be something I cared about. So, suit. I honestly don't give a damn about whether or not Catwoman has a cowl.
 
Joe seems to be in a whole lot more scenes than I initially expected. And that's not a bad thing. Heck, he probably shot more scenes since last week than Bale or Hardy. I noticed that Bale's and Hardy's scenes were all during the 1st week (CMU for Bale, CMU and Heinz for Hardy) and they've been MIA since.
you only saw less then 10 scenes from him, did you expect him to be only 47 seconds in the movie :awesome::woot:
 
Gimme the cowl. TDK suit looks functional as it is.
 
The one I highlighted in bold is what I'm betting on. August 5th we got the Catwoman reveal; August 11th we got the Batplane; this week I'm guessing it's another new vehicle for Batman.

From your lips to God's ears! Well in this case, from your fingers! :awesome:
 
it's also easy to do. it's like a 6 yr old kid telling another

"I know something you don't. neener neener neener."

I've been reading these forums for years. One thing I've noticed - when someone SAYS they have inside information, but that they can't post it, it almost ALWAYS means they're full of it.

I've seen even the best, most reputable posters fall. They participate in the community, write interesting, thought-provoking posts, even call your attention to new news and information - and then they realize they can SAY they know something, when they don't, and people will believe them. Before long, they're getting off on that little bit of power. That little "neener neener" feeling of superiority.

It's sad, but it happens. Over and over again. And people continue to believe them. Over and over again.

So if someone says they have inside knowledge, but don't share it with you, then it's pretty much a certainty that they're lying.

And don't trust the usual excuses - there are ways of disseminating information without implicating the original sources. And when a source leaks information, it's usually with the intention that the poster will in turn spread the information to the community - NOT keep it to themselves. (Otherwise, why leak it to the single, solitary poster in the first place?)
 
While the adult in me understands the reasoning behind not spilling the beans on some stories because they may be just that huge, the kid in me just wants to yell "TELL US ALREADY!!!!" (cause lets face it, if you didnt want to know a spoiler or want to post a spoiler, you would not be in the spoiler section.)
 
So are we getting the big scoop today?

While I respect the Ninjas wishes not to tell us, I highly doubt it would destroy their sources. Especially if it's something like "Catwoman has a cowl". Subaru knows something about the cat suit that we don't know. I doubt telling us will cause his sources to come crumbling down. I mean posting videos of them filming(which I greatly appreciate! :) ) is much more spoilerish than just telling us if she has a cowl or not.

Now I don't know if Rangork's scoop is the same as Subaru's scoop on the cat suit, but can we please just get the scoop on the Catwoman suit? Seriously, I don't get how writing out one sentence about the suit, about something we don't know, will hurt your sources. It wont, it really wont. Unless it's something super specific to the film's plot. But if it's just "Catwoman has the cat cowl" than please tell us! :)

Thank again to all the Ninjas for their hard work!
 
I've been reading these forums for years. One thing I've noticed - when someone SAYS they have inside information, but that they can't post it, it almost ALWAYS means they're full of it.

I've seen even the best, most reputable posters fall. They participate in the community, write interesting, thought-provoking posts, even call your attention to new news and information - and then they realize they can SAY they know something, when they don't, and people will believe them. Before long, they're getting off on that little bit of power. That little "neener neener" feeling of superiority.

It's sad, but it happens. Over and over again. And people continue to believe them. Over and over again.

So if someone says they have inside knowledge, but don't share it with you, then it's pretty much a certainty that they're lying.

And don't trust the usual excuses - there are ways of disseminating information without implicating the original sources. And when a source leaks information, it's usually with the intention that the poster will in turn spread the information to the community - NOT keep it to themselves. (Otherwise, why leak it to the single, solitary poster in the first place?)

But Raganork has correctly informed us before.
 
AKpi6.jpg


http://twitpic.com/67lwz9
 
But Raganork has correctly informed us before.

Haha, sounds like you missed the point of the post.

Even the best posters have gone bad. Not once. Not twice. But over and over. It's all too easy to become a con man on an internet forum. But if you step back, you can see the cycle repeat itself constantly.

Here's another sign when someone's BSing you - they tell you "I won't tell you what I know, but I'll confirm if it matches up to anything someone else reports."

Great - so then how do you know they're for real, and not just saying they're confirming someone else's scoop when they actually have no idea if it's valid (to steal their thunder and attempt to lend themselves credibility)? The answer is - you don't, of course. But if you believe it's an informed confirmation, you believe the poster was telling the truth all along (about knowing something), and that builds him up in your eyes.

Essentially they add nothing to the conversation, but garner attention for themselves.

It's the same kind of thing BOF stoops to. ("Oh, I knew all along, but couldn't tell you. Now that it's out there, I can confirm that it's true, since I knew beforehand."). And now we all deride them for that. But believe it or not, there was a time when BOF was a legit site. But just like the fall of any good poster, they too succumbed to that con man mentality, to garner intention and get off on the "neener neener" feeling.
 
frakkingoff makes some good points. Not saying that our ninjas our lying, but he still makes some valid points.

I mean if they can't tell us the news until the news itself matches up with some other report, then what is the point of telling us that they have the news? It's just kind of cruel. It leaves us in the dark. Point is, if they have some big news, but they can't tell us, than they shouldn't tell us that they have it. Because to tell us "I know something you guys don't know, but I can't say"...it's really painful! lol

Please Subaru just tell us what you know about the Catwoman suit. Please! It makes no sense not to. I don't know how it would hurt your "sources". It's not like you have to tell us your sources.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,359
Messages
22,091,378
Members
45,886
Latest member
Elchido
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"