The Dark Knight Rises OFFICIAL: Batman in the Burgh - Part 10

[subaruwrxfan]

Or be split into two movies.....

LOL, now that would be funny. If they went all Twilight/Harry Potter on us. That never even occured to me. I could totally seem them splitting it into 2 movies.

 

[kvz5]

I'm telling ya... I bet that is the "news".

 

[Spideyfan93]

Nolan would not allow for that.

 

[Pagan]

from what I've read looking around the net the avg for a 2 hour action movie is around 100-115 scenes.

 

[aliensarchive]

It says Roll 2 Scene 90 Take 2.

 

[Pagan]

It says Roll 2 Scene 90 Take 2.

that's not what it looks like to me. it looks like it says roll f87 scene 290 take 2

 

[TheBatman072]

Nolan would not allow for that.

What if he was the one who wanted to do it?

What's the question that everybody's asking since TDK? How can they top it with a sequel right?

What's the answer? By going balls to the freaking wall, not cutting a single thing, and telling an epic 5 hour story set to two movies that's how!

Think about it. If Nolan wanted to tell a huge epic story, and didn't want anything to be cut, and suggested that they break it up into two, WB would not hesitate for a second.

It's win/win on both sides.

 

[aliensarchive]

[YT]XORpIZ76JJU[/YT]

 

[Spideyfan93]

Are we really discussing this now? lmfao

This will not be a Part 1 Part 2 thing. It's ending as a trilogy...and probably a 2 and 1 half to 3 hour epic end.

 

[TheBatman072]

Are we really discussing this now? lmfao

This will not be a Part 1 Part 2 thing. It's ending as a trilogy...and probably a 2 and 1 half to 3 hour epic end.

Are you dictating what can and can't be discussed on a message board designed specifically for that?

It would still technically be a trilogy actually. Just one long ass movie, split into two.

 

[Charlie The Red]

Pagan:

You said an average scene count for a two hour action film is 100 - 115 scenes. Is that before or after editing? I mean, is that the scene count AS THEY ARE SHOT or the number of scenes that are actually in the movie?

 

[The_Raganork]

This is part of the news I was alluding to.

 

[Anita18]

Nolan would not allow for that.

If he's really shooting "scene 290" as written in the script, he might have originally wrote it out to be two movies to begin with...but then why would WB misdirect us like that?

Hmmm.....

 

[Spideyfan93]

Are you dictating what can and can't be discussed on a message board designed specifically for that?

It would still technically be a trilogy actually. Just one long ass movie, split into two.

No of course not. Everyone's entitled to discuss whatever.

Just that, if it were to occur, it would have been announced earlier this year with the press announcement. It's open to discussion, but in the sense of WHAT IF rather than a possibility.

 

[kvz5]

This is part of the news I was alluding to.

Holy crap. And it's just part of it? So there's more to this news than that? Wow.

If he's really shooting "scene 290" as written in the script, he might have originally wrote it out to be two movies to begin with...but then why would WB misdirect us like that?

Hmmm.....

Didn't they suddenly move MoS to Summer of 2013? I wonder if there's any connection to that.

Would a 6 month shoot be enough for 2 movies? They also shot TDK in about 6 months, right?

 

[Pagan]

This is part of the news I was alluding to.

the length of the film? it does seem to be a really long shoot. from may to november.

 

[kvz5]

Wasn't TDK also a 6 month shoot?

 

[Anita18]

Didn't they suddenly move MoS to Summer of 2013? I wonder if there's any connection to that.

Would a 6 month shoot be enough for 2 movies? They also shot TDK in about 6 months, right?

Well, they'd want to release Batman in the summer too. If it's two movies, they might make us wait until 2014 or something.

Yeah, no idea if the 6-month shoot would be enough for two movies. How did Peter Jackson do it for LOTR? I believe he had second units up the wazoo.

 

[TheBatman072]

Holy crap. And it's just part of it? So there's more to this news than that? Wow.



Didn't they suddenly move MoS to Summer of 2013? I wonder if there's any connection to that.

Would a 6 month shoot be enough for 2 movies? They also shot TDK in about 6 months, right?

Well, didn't they shoot pirates 2 and 3 back to back in a similar time period?

It can be done if so.

 

[The_Raganork]

A tag team in 2013 with Supes and Batman would secure the summer for WB

 

[Goku Goes Crazy]

This is part of the news I was alluding to.

Wait, wait...what are you alluding to? The movie will be split into two parts? Or something else? Does this have to do with the Catwoman spoilers?

 

[chalnger86]

Yeah, I dunno what's up with that marker, every way I try to twist it, it still seems wrong. Can't be scene 90 either, 29 isn't a logical conclusion. So who knows.

If I remember correctly, the clapper at heinz field said scene 189. So, go figure!

 

[Brother Jack]

I seriously doubt this is going to be a two-part film. Nolan doesn't strike me as the type of director who would do that.

 

[kvz5]

Maybe it's 2 part but it's just an hour and half. 6 months will probably be alright for a 3 hour in total movie.

 

[Wedge A.]

I'd rather have a three and a half hour movie than two parts.