heh I thought the First FF Thing was great. Looked more like the first issue Thing of the Kirby days. I do hope they keep that in mind when redoing FF at Marvel if they ever do. The Thing Brow shouldn't be so pronounced early on.Have to admit I really like the pronounced brow Kirby originally drew and how the eye brows moved independently. Just like I missed it on the Thing in the F movies. I do like a lot of what I see though. Looks not bad.
JAK®;19820876 said:The 1990 Red Skull is better, because I can see a swastika![]()
JAK®;19820956 said:
I also thought that. It will be interesting to see if someone shoops the pic of The Red Skull to give him more darkness around the eyes. I remember someone saying how spooky it was to see Skull's eyes hovering in the darkness like that.
lolLol, I know a poster in another thread that would litereally have a fit if he saw that manip.
This version is from the Marvel's website
![]()
http://marvel.com/news/story/15325/..._first_photo_of_hugo_weaving_as_the_red_skull
this version is from the marvel's website
![]()
http://marvel.com/news/story/15325/..._first_photo_of_hugo_weaving_as_the_red_skull
JAK®;19820956 said:
Never have I felt more like I was looking at a living, breathing comic book villain than when I saw this image.
Can you tell me the origin of this face? I keep seeing it on message boards and I want to know where it came from. Is it a reference to something?
Brian Braddock said:Awesome, isnt it? Actually, in all this time since that image or the teaser showing Skull has been released, I dont think I've seen who's responsible for the make-up fx.
Anyone?
I think that he got his own dust of death on his face but somehow he survivedI always thought The Red Skull fell into a vat of chemicals.