Tacit Ronin
Avenger
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2009
- Messages
- 20,527
- Reaction score
- 8
- Points
- 31
I find that almost impossible to believe. Jackson didn't compound the entire premise with spare orcs and perhaps strangling trees or quicksand or 300 spiders?
Right on.Just got out of my screening and similar to the first Hobbit, I enjoyed it overall. Minor complaints here and there. If you liked the first one you should like this one.
Just got out of my screening and similar to the first Hobbit, I enjoyed it overall. Minor complaints here and there. If you liked the first one you should like this one.
Just got out of my screening and similar to the first Hobbit, I enjoyed it overall. Minor complaints here and there. If you liked the first one you should like this one.
I loved the first film so I'm def gonna love this then it seems. What were your thoughts on Smaug and the last half hour or whatever it is with him.
Care to go into detail about the cliffhanger ending?
I'm just a casual fan of this entire franchise so could anyone with knowledge, who doesn't care about a spoiler, answer me a question about Tauriel?....
One of my problems with the movie is this supposed romance they have between Tauriel and Kili. Does it exist in canon? Cause it felt pretty forced and awkward to me. I'm unsure if they are planning to set up some love triangle situation along with Legolas, cause it appeared so.
No Tauriel doesn't even exist in the book.
About the ending, you said it intercuts with "Tauriel, and some of the dwarves left at Laketown ". Which dwarves remain at Laketown? That is a pretty big departure from the book. If I remember correctly all 13 dwarves go to the mountain.
I see, I quite like the character but her subplot not so much.
I believe a total of 4 dwarves remained behind: Kili, Fili, and two others that I don't remember the name of. Details below of why that is below...
Kili took a poisonous orc arrow to the leg/knee. So Thorin asked him to stay behind cause he would slow them down. Fili refuses to leave his brother behind. This also feeds into the whole romantic subplot as Tauriel heals him and they have a "moment". And one of the other two overslept and missed the boat taking everyone else to the Lonely Mountain.
Could you describe the two who's names you don't remember?
I can never seem to pick my absolute favorite part. Sometimes it is the unexpected guests, others times the trolls, sometimes Beorn's house, every once and a while the spiders and then of course Smaug time. That is of course leaving out the barrels and Riddles in the Dark.spider scene is actually my favorite part in the book. i hear it's a tad brief in the movie but, man, i am really looking forward to that scene.
About the CGI v practical effects thing: a part of this debate, for me, is the fact that I enjoy and appreciate stagecraft: costumes, sets, locations and props are a big part of a film's appeal for me. It just isn't the same when you know that what you are watching is all a distorted blue screen illusion constructed by sweaty men in a computer laboratory. The fact that the results look less convincing just adds insult to injury.
Just got out of my screening and similar to the first Hobbit, I enjoyed it overall. Minor complaints here and there. If you liked the first one you should like this one.
And yet in FOTR we had a special kitchen table constructed so that Gandalf would appear bigger than Frodo while they sat opposite each other.
And yet the Orcs of LOTR were men in masks, and looked better than the CGI soap sculptures of The Hobbit.
No one is demanding that Smaug be a spray painted iguana shot 500 yards in the foreground of Martin Freeman. We just question the wisdom of using CGI where practical effects once did a wonderful job.

t: