Did this clip get posted?
Empire said:With the numerous threads left unresolved (Legolas pursuit of Bolg at Smaugs finale is abandoned entirely) and key appearances truncated (Beorns return lasts a single shot), we can look forward to the certainty of a far weightier Extended Edition this time next year.
Why do you guys even hang out in this thread if you don't like any of the Hobbit films?
They enjoy not liking it together.Why do you guys even hang out in this thread if you don't like any of the Hobbit films?
Some of the choices do seem pretty odd. However, I haven't seen the actual movie so its too early to judge. Maybe Legolas does get a duel with Bolg, just not a continuation of the chase. I would have thought that all these characters would get multiple scenes to shine, as I expected the runtime to be quite a bit longer than it is.The wiser thing to do would be to ignore the thread and film entirely, but I can't blame purists and book fans for their curiosity. Even if I outright hated the films Id still be very curious about Jackson's choices and changes so you'd still find me in here. As a fan of Tolkiens world and filmmaking in general the choices of Jackson do fascinate me as much as they sometimes baffle me.
But I do enjoy these films and am very much looking forward to this film. Im just a little disappointed by some of Jackson's choices. Hopefully some of the issues I have can be fixed or helped by the extended edition.
The Beorn thing is really bizarre. It seems like a cynical ploy to sell more extended editions.
The Beorn thing is really bizarre. It seems like a cynical ploy to sell more extended editions.
Just so I've got this straight:
SPOILERS AHEAD
SPOILERS
- Legolas rides a ****ing bat
- Legolas kills Bolg
- Fili is killed unceremoniously by Azog
- Kili dies defending Tauriel
- Beorn is in the movie for a matter of seconds
- Dain is CG 95% of the time, is a comedic character, and isn't crowned king
- Thorin's funeral isn't shown
Amazing. Three, three-hour films based on a 300-page book, and they still drop iconic scenes.
The Beorn thing is really bizarre. It seems like a cynical ploy to sell more extended editions.
Wow. This is like dropping Darth Vader's death so that you can show a scene of Jar Jar Binks tap dancing.
What the **** were these people thinking?
Seriously, this thing is now more like a video game than a movie. A lifeless wad of computer generated visuals providing an empty husk of a story for adolescent males. Heck, there are video games with better storytelling and pacing.
You mean a film in which a dwarf prince battles the odds to reclaim his kingdom, a wizard uncovers an evil conspiracy, and an elf prince defies all laws of physics to become the most powerful being in Middle-earth.Yes, in a film in which a lowly hobbit teaches a greedy dwarf king that the simple pleasures of life are worth far more than riches or gold.* The cognitive dissonance and hypocrisy is baffling.
*unless they cut that part too
It really should have been 4.Amazing. Three, three-hour films based on a 300-page book, and they still drop iconic scenes.
I could spout off a list of things in these movies that are far from necessary (still in the movies though!), but I'd run the risk of using up the rest of SHH's bandwidth.They haven't cut Thorin's death. Just the funeral, and as much as I want to see it, its not strictly necessary.

Yes he should. If his father and his people go to war he would of course be there with them. The only reason he wasn't in the book is because Tolkien hadn't invented him yet.