Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.
Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
did he said that the movie will not be in 3D or that the he will not shot the movie in 3D?a 3d conversation 6 months before the premiere is still possible.
i will watch it in 2D because this is what the director wants.
Nolan was most eager to talk about the fact that Warner Bros. had agreed with his argument that the film should resist the current 3-D craze and instead use high-definition approaches and IMAX cameras to strike out on a different cinematic path than the stereoscopic technology that, for better or worse, has become the dominant conversation in the blockbuster sector.
I for one am SO glad we won't be messing with 3D in this series!
Should resist the current 3-D craze and instead use high-definition approaches and IMAX cameras to strike out on a different cinematic path
how many times must it be explained that they can not make an entire movie with an imax cameras?
The movie won't be in 3-D.
Despite mixed reaction to the news regarding the title and no Riddler, this is one thing we can all be pleased about.
Between this and The Hobbit being allowed to continue in New Zealand, WB's stock has gone up for me. I appreciate when studios show faith in the filmmakers' judgments for major, high-budget, blockbuster franchises.
how many times must it be explained that they can not make an entire movie with an imax cameras?
Says something about Nolan's pull doesn't it?
how many times must it be explained that they can not make an entire movie with an imax cameras?