Safe Haven for Those Who Demand More

Cullen, I didn't mean to be so hard on you.
In addition to the fact that I always operate under the assumption that you want to be abused because it gies you an excuse to sulk (which is a perfectly valid pattern of behavior as far as I'm concerned... don't let anyone tell you different), real life is pure sh1t right now.

That, and because the Hype's Search function has disavowed more than a year's worth of posts and brings up ancient history instead. I read some of my older rants, and posts from the plebeians who inspired them, and I remembered all too clearly why I hate people.

In any case, unless you actually want me to verbally abuse you further, I'd rather drop this stupid argument. If you have a plot in mind that you'd want to put into a 1.5-2 hour Batman film of your own creation, we'd be happy to hear it.

:wolverine
 
Matter dropped, then.

On the topic of a Batman treatment... I'm thinking about it...
 
I honestly didn't mean to make a personal attack against your integrity as a writer, Cullen. Especially not in here. The only fighting allowed in here is that which is in good fun.

:wolverine
 
Herr Logan said:
I honestly didn't mean to make a personal attack against your integrity as a writer, Cullen. Especially not in here. The only fighting allowed in here is that which is in good fun.

:wolverine
Indeed
 
Seriously, Cullen, I'm truly sorry if I struck a nerve.
I was taking it too far and it really wasn't you I was actually thinking about when I started spouting words like "cowardice" and "laziness."

:wolverine
 
Herr Logan said:
Seriously, Cullen, I'm truly sorry if I struck a nerve.
I was taking it too far and it really wasn't you I was actually thinking about when I started spouting words like "cowardice" and "laziness."

:wolverine
Y'did strike one, I admit. Funny thing was, I didn't even know I was hit until I noticed the ranting involved in what I was going to post.

Doesn't matter. Considering the majority of the times I irritate you was done unintentionally, I see this as you evening up the books a bit.
 
Cullen said:
Y'did strike one, I admit. Funny thing was, I didn't even know I was hit until I noticed the ranting involved in what I was going to post.

Doesn't matter. Considering the majority of the times I irritate you was done unintentionally, I see this as you evening up the books a bit.

Fair enough. ;)


Okay, Zaphod, get your ass in here and post something brilliant (or something telling me that what I posted before was brilliant). I don't want all this procrastinating and avoiding my term paper to be in vain!

:wolverine
 
"were done unintentionally", is what I meant.

Grammar! Why must you plague me so! :(
 
Lujho:

If I didn't alienate you with my comments earlier, it would be cool if you could post some of those manips you made of a faithful Batman costume all those months ago. I have several saved on my computer but have trouble hosting them.

Also, just to check, you didn't physically make any of those costumes, did you? I think I remember those were manips of some fan-made film. Either way, you're very talented at both drawing images from scratch as well as altering live-action images. :up:

:wolverine
 
Chuck Dixon gets it.

I think it's always interesting to hear from Dixon. For a decade he basically WAS Batman and it's always neat (to a big geek like me, at least) to hear a comics pro talk about the movies made from their work and the creative process.
 
That link isn't going anywhere for me.

EDIT: Nevermind, now it works. Thanks, Zev, I'll listen to the whole thing later today. :up:

:wolverine
 
"I think it's always interesting to hear from Dixon."

Why am I not surprised that a political diatribe concerning current events made an appearance 1/5 of the way through this Chuck Dixon interview?

Here's hoping he actually says something about the Batman that supports the credo of this thread at some point.

:wolverine
 
Herr Logan said:
Why am I not surprised that a political diatribe concerning current events made an appearance 1/5 of the way through this Chuck Dixon interview?

Well, to be fair, it's not like there are a lot of writers who keep mum on current events these days. I'm looking at you, Alan Moore, and your crazy, crazy-ass beard.

And actually I was referring to him discussing some of his retcons that made it into Batman Begins and specifically how he felt about comic book adaptations. Plus, he codified pretty much the entire Bat-family for a goodly period, so it's kinda like, say, hearing Chris Claremront talk about the X-Men (only, ya know, without a lot of lesbian subtext. Which is a pity, in my opinion).
 
Zev said:
Well, to be fair, it's not like there are a lot of writers who keep mum on current events these days. I'm looking at you, Alan Moore, and your crazy, crazy-ass beard.

And actually I was referring to him discussing some of his retcons that made it into Batman Begins and specifically how he felt about comic book adaptations. Plus, he codified pretty much the entire Bat-family for a goodly period, so it's kinda like, say, hearing Chris Claremront talk about the X-Men (only, ya know, without a lot of lesbian subtext. Which is a pity, in my opinion).

Claremont should have stayed off the books. When he himself isn't doing much better than than the newer hacks writing those titles, it's better he keep his legacy and not soil himself with the fruits of waning talent, or a barren selection of new, good ideas.

Chuck Dixon would hate my idea for a Batman movie, then, because that would definitely seem like two movies crammed into one, and there'd be even more stuff going on. You know, like an actual crime plot, instead of that half-assed "we've got Falcone at the scene and his syndicate is destroyed in one night" bull$hit. What a perversion of a mafia boss that was. I mean, this guy supposedly runs Gotham's underworld, but he himself can be found anywhere near a major drug trafficking operation? Pre-frickin'-posterous.

Zev, have you ever seen 'The Wire'?

:wolverine
 
Herr Logan said:
Claremont should have stayed off the books. When he himself isn't doing much better than than the newer hacks writing those titles, it's better he keep his legacy and not soil himself with the fruits of waning talent, or a barren selection of new, good ideas.

But then where would I get my lesbian subtext? Think, McFly!

femslashlov.jpg


Thank you, Chris Claremont.
 
Zev said:
Nope. You ever read Nightwing?

Nope. Not sure I want to if Devin Grayson is on the book. That's based on the fact that I've read the novelization of 'The Rise of Sin Tzu' (since I never finished the game... also, I like to read superhero novels) and there was some pretty stupid writing in that. I think she's a little too in love with Nightwing.


'The Wire' is a crime drama on HBO (you can rent it, you don't need HBO) that has a very good handle on portraying both cops and criminals in Baltimore. It's created by the same guy who wrote the book on which 'Homicide: Life of the Street' was based, except it's not directed or produced by Barry Levinson and therefore doesn't spend a lot of time of romanticizing the on-and-off Murder Capital of the World.

Anyway, if you like crime shows, check out 'The Wire'

:wolverine
 
Herr Logan said:
Is that from back in the day?

:wolverine

No, it's from one of the Daughters of the Dragon specials. I think this year.

That's what I love about Claremont. Certain other writers will try to get all hoity-toity with you and talk about racism or the future or important social issues. Not Claremont. His attitude is "If I'm gonna write about hot women in tight spandex, I'm damn sure gonna base that on the assumption that they're all having sex off-panel." Which, frankly, is an attitude that could improve ANYTHING. Joel Schumacher movies? Yes. 24? Yes. Voter turnout? Yes.

Now if only he could stop using five hundred words to say "Cyclops got a cup of coffee."

And I'll give The Wire a shot once I'm done Netflixing Battlestar Galactica. Because I have priorities on these sorts of things...

P.S. Claremont isn't alone on this. I'm convinced that Marv Wolfman's take on the New Teen Titans is "everyone is secretly bisexual and either having sex with everyone else, wants to have sex with everybody else, or ARE having sex with everybody else." There are panels with Kory and Raven that are SOOOO obvious, and Gar and Vic are totally... but I'll stop.
 
Zev said:
No, it's from one of the Daughters of the Dragon specials. I think this year.

That's what I love about Claremont. Certain other writers will try to get all hoity-toity with you and talk about racism or the future or important social issues. Not Claremont. His attitude is "If I'm gonna write about hot women in tight spandex, I'm damn sure gonna base that on the assumption that they're all having sex off-panel." Which, frankly, is an attitude that could improve ANYTHING. Joel Schumacher movies? Yes. 24? Yes. Voter turnout? Yes.

Now if only he could stop using five hundred words to say "Cyclops got a cup of coffee."

And I'll give The Wire a shot once I'm done Netflixing Battlestar Galactica. Because I have priorities on these sorts of things...

P.S. Claremont isn't alone on this. I'm convinced that Marv Wolfman's take on the New Teen Titans is "everyone is secretly bisexual and either having sex with everyone else, wants to have sex with everybody else, or ARE having sex with everybody else." There are panels with Kory and Raven that are SOOOO obvious, and Gar and Vic are totally... but I'll stop.

My woman and I are Netflixing 'Battlestar Galactica' as well. Good stuff. There's some pretty terrible stretches of writing sometimes (the Cylons are truly horrible), but overall I like it.

I never read Teen Titans, so I'll take your word for it.

Speaking of Claremonth and lesbian subtext, did they ever reveal Rogue's definitive parentage? Is it Mystique and Destiny, or Mystique and herself?

:wolverine
 
Herr Logan said:
Speaking of Claremonth and lesbian subtext, did they ever reveal Rogue's definitive parentage? Is it Mystique and Destiny, or Mystique and herself?

:wolverine

Frankly, at this point, I'm just glad her father didn't turn out to be Satan. Chuck Austen: Making other X-writers look good since 1996.

Also, back in the day? Claremont didn't even bother making it subtle.

000082b9


I mean, dear God, Claremont, WHO DO YOU THINK YOU'RE KIDDING! I think they could actually strip naked and have sex on-panel and it would be less gay then that.

Hmmm... I wonder what all this discussion of lesbian subtext is doing for your thread views?
 
Zev said:
Frankly, at this point, I'm just glad her father didn't turn out to be Satan. Chuck Austen: Making other X-writers look good since 1996.

Also, back in the day? Claremont didn't even bother making it subtle.


I mean, dear God, Claremont, WHO DO YOU THINK YOU'RE KIDDING! I think they could actually strip naked and have sex on-panel and it would be less gay then that.

Hmmm... I wonder what all this discussion of lesbian subtext is doing for your thread views?

Sweet honey-glazed Jesus playing the tambourine!

I think I'll file that away for later. :o

Right before this 'House of M' crap, when Psylocke came back, she kissed like three different X-Men (possibly one of them female) and Dr. Henry McCoy, ever the professional, sniffed her, pawed at her and licked her during her physical exam. I seriously thought it was going to turn into an orgy in the next issue. I was disappointed in more ways than one, as everything from Marvel is disappointing to me and I haven't paid for their current issues in possibly a year.

:wolverine
 
Trust me. However dirty Claremont is, he's frickin' Pat Robertson compared to Marv Wolfman.

Herr Logan said:
I never read Teen Titans, so I'll take your word for it.

You don't have to. The first time you read it, you're pretty much "Okay, this is your standard 'teenagers save the world' deal." Then you read it again and you realize it's one really big, really dirty soap opera. It makes Nip/Tuck and The O.C. look like an episode of Full House! And just going by what's CANON...

02071142364834.jpg


That last panel? Should stand right beside Watchmen and Dark Knight Returns as a milestone in comics history.

newtitansv209023rougher9xq.jpg


"You're the one who attacked me! And tied me up! And I distinctly recall saying the safe word, MULTIPLE times!"

newteentitans390077rf.jpg


"Raven, I'd like to go somewhere else to talk, someplace warm, will you...?"

Zev's No-Fail Lesbianism Detector
Current Status: Low levels of lesbian subtext.

newteentitans390086tv.jpg


"Raven, do you love me?"

Zev's No-Fail Lesbianism Detector
Current Status: Increasing levels of lesbian subtext.

newteentitans390092ta.jpg


"I think we're really going to be friends now, Raven."

"I... I want that, Koriand'r... very much."

Zev's No-Fail Lesbianism Detector
Current Status: Warning! Warning! Extremely high levels of lesbian subtext!

newteentitans390107cr.jpg


"Fondness, even love deepens..."

"...deeper, more intimately than ever before."

"Born so different, yet now so close."

Zev's No-Fail Lesbianism Detector
Current Status: Overload! Overload! Overload!


Yeah, let's see you read my Teen Titans fanfic and say "not appropriate for Teen Titans" after THAT! I swear to God, I don't know how they got away with this stuff in a comic book for kids...
 
Zev said:
Trust me. However dirty Claremont is, he's frickin' Pat Robertson compared to Marv Wolfman.



You don't have to. The first time you read it, you're pretty much "Okay, this is your standard 'teenagers save the world' deal." Then you read it again and you realize it's one really big, really dirty soap opera. It makes Nip/Tuck and The O.C. look like an episode of Full House! And just going by what's CANON...



That last panel? Should stand right beside Watchmen and Dark Knight Returns as a milestone in comics history.



"You're the one who attacked me! And tied me up! And I distinctly recall saying the safe word, MULTIPLE times!"



"Raven, I'd like to go somewhere else to talk, someplace warm, will you...?"

Zev's No-Fail Lesbianism Detector
Current Status: Low levels of lesbian subtext.



"Raven, do you love me?"

Zev's No-Fail Lesbianism Detector
Current Status: Increasing levels of lesbian subtext.



"I think we're really going to be friends now, Raven."

"I... I want that, Koriand'r... very much."

Zev's No-Fail Lesbianism Detector
Current Status: Warning! Warning! Extremely high levels of lesbian subtext!



"Fondness, even love deepens..."

"...deeper, more intimately than ever before."

"Born so different, yet now so close."

Zev's No-Fail Lesbianism Detector
Current Status: Overload! Overload! Overload!


Yeah, let's see you read my Teen Titans fanfic and say "not appropriate for Teen Titans" after THAT! I swear to God, I don't know how they got away with this stuff in a comic book for kids...
Only that last chunk had any real lesbian subtext of note, and I was actually looking for it.

Hey, I never said anything about Teen Titans and whether your tendency for filthy text (not even subtext, but text) is incongruous with that. I said that about Spider-Man and I stand by it. Hell, I'd say that about any Marvel property that isn't part of the 'Ultimate' universe or the 'MAX' line.

I do appreciate this educational material, but since I've invited a couple of new people to this thread (they probably won't show up) and am still waiting on certain people to continue the Batman discussion (and any on-topic ideas on any superhero property), I'm thinking we should table this discussion for another thread. Seriously, it's not that it's an unworthy topic, but it is off-topic.



On that note, Zaphod, what in the sphincter of hell are you playing at?? Post, dammit!

:wolverine
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"