Should there be a Underworld 3?

Should there be an Underworld 3?

  • Yes, without a doubt!

  • No, 2 movies were enough!

  • Let's wait to see how much it makes!


Results are only viewable after voting.
The first one was really good. I haven't seen the second one yet. There just seems to be this mad flux of horror movies and I can't keep up.

I do love vampires and werewolves and the two togehter is a beautiful thing, the make up job was damn nice.
 
Yes, I think there should be an Underworld 3, possibly giving us a good reason how this was kept such a good secret from the humans, because there's no way that things couldn't have slipped out and people getting suspicious, because how many vampires/werewolves are there? Probably quite a few. There's gotta be a third party or something that's helping keep it all quiet,
besides the cleaners, they seem to be very few and far between

A third one without Kate probably wouldn't be the same. She's just got that prescence. Scott I can do without, he's a bit silly in my opinion.
 
I would like to see all humans finding out about Vampires and Lycans would be cool.
 
Yeah. The ultimate battle for survival. And it leaves Selene alone. Depresed and alone, like Elektra. She kills and lives without reason at the end.

I want to see selene hit rock bottom in the third one. As I said before.
 
Ultimate Movie-Man said:
I want to see selene hit rock bottom in the third one. As I said before.

that would be intresting.
 
See her go rock bottom and then let her go on a killing spree.

Then the humans kill her. Somehow...
 
I don't want her to die in the thrid one, it will just make me sad, and i don't like seeing my favouite characters die, i want her to live she has had a sort of crappy life what about i happy ending for once lol.

But i would like to see her be a villian for a while or just a villian as it would be intresting to see and i've never seen Kate play a villian.
 
Len Wiseman said:
We’ve been developing UNDERWORLD 3 for a while. I won’t be directing UNDERWORLD 3; I’m just going to be producing and writing.
That might be a bad thing. I mean he's not a great director but Underworlds he handled very well. I hope they(/he) pick a good director for this one.

http://www.ifmagazine.com/new.asp?article=3038
 
Didn't we see Selene hit rock bottom at the end of the first movie? Isn't that where we come in there then?
 
I'm not sure where they should go with a third film unless theres one more vampire thats in that room where marcus comes out of.
 
Well it doesnt look like Selene (Kate Beckinsale) will be back.

:(

I wish it was a sequel instead of a prequel.
 
I actually thought about how these films fit together, and came to a realization that there really isn''t anything else to tell.

I WANT A MINDLESS "GOING-OUT-WITH-A-BANG" SEQUEL!! NO MATTER HOW BAD IT IS, I WANT TO GO OUT WITH A BANG!!!
 
Ultimate Movie-Man said:
I actually thought about how these films fit together, and came to a realization that there really isn''t anything else to tell.

I WANT A MINDLESS "GOING-OUT-WITH-A-BANG" SEQUEL!! NO MATTER HOW BAD IT IS, I WANT TO GO OUT WITH A BANG!!!

I agree, out with a bang, also i think they will do a sequel first and finish off this triloge.
 
I wish there was a way that they could work Van Helsing or Frankenstein into the storyline for a new Underworld movie. If the Underworld director had done the Van Helsing movie maybe things would have turned out much better.
 
Ultimate Movie-Man said:
Yeah. If you do a movie in a trilogy without one of the major players...*down the toilet*

I coudn't agree more, i mean Underworld without Kate and her character would be strange and not as good. I really like her character as shes a girl she can kick butt more better then some male hero's, shes strong and the main character as well.
 
Bastila said:
I agree, out with a bang, also i think they will do a sequel first and finish off this triloge.

Len and Kate have both said that the third film is being wrote and its a prequel that want involve much of Kate in it.
 
I still think they will do Underworld 3 first, then the prequel. But i read in the paper today (could be lies, you know what papers are like), but it said that Kate has moved out from her house with Len. lol might mean no Underworld lol, but its more likly a lie.
 
Anyway, I just don't see a prequel doing any business. Without the two main characters people like and the failure to wrap up the cliffhanger of the second movie people will be turned off. Len overestimates the power of his world as it is interesting but Middle Earth it ain't, nor SW or anything and there is not a very high demand at all to see what led to these events as the flashbacks in the first movie and the opening of the second did it for us. There is no demand to go back and see more bad costumes and Viktor yelling at Markus about **** while Ameilla just stands there trying to look hot.

I mean people would rather see the story wrapped up as while the Underworld world is entertaining, it is not something that needs to be delved into so much in my opinion.
 
Bastila said:
I still think they will do Underworld 3 first, then the prequel. But i read in the paper today (could be lies, you know what papers are like), but it said that Kate has moved out from her house with Len. lol might mean no Underworld lol, but its more likly a lie.

They're married :confused:
 
I did, so that sounds a bit silly...the whole moving out busniess. Maybe...maybe sh'es moving for her next movie?
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"