I liked BEYOND a lot. I know a lot of people give it a hard time, but I thought it was fun and had a lot of wild action. I hear some people say "But....STAR TREK isn't about action."....I wonder why Kirk got into a fight every week where he showed off his Kirk-Fu then. STAR TREK is about adventures in space.
I can't stand any of the Kelvin films, but at least Into Darkness had Cumberbatch who was great in the role, even if they did butcher the character. I can recognize that '09 has a better balance of screen time for the actors, and gives most if them something to do, but unfortunately most of what they do is nonsense. And Beyond felt like an empty, soulless cash grab. There's literally nothing about that film that I like (does the Rihanna song count?).
Into Darkness also had the best score of the three films, to me.
Supposedly Star Trek is A Wagon Train to the stars, Those old westerns had a lot of action in them, just saying.I liked BEYOND a lot. I know a lot of people give it a hard time, but I thought it was fun and had a lot of wild action. I hear some people say "But....STAR TREK isn't about action."....I wonder why Kirk got into a fight every week where he showed off his Kirk-Fu then. STAR TREK is about adventures in space.
I wonder if he'll follow the continuity set by Abrams or just make a new story with original characters. He seems to be a fan of the original characters and the new films do have great actors in the roles.
I agree it was good, but it didn't do well enough for Paramount.A reboot would be a waste. They have a great cast and the series isn't suffering enough to require a reboot. Beyond was really good.