W/ Great Power
Uncle Ben
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2014
- Messages
- 3,774
- Reaction score
- 9
- Points
- 58
At this point, I'll be very disappointed if Mysterio isn't in S6.
Definitely digging Grauso's theory for him
Definitely digging Grauso's theory for him
A friendly reminder to our users, please make sure your account is safe. Make sure you update your password and have an active email address to recover or change your password.
No, he's driven by fear.
sounds like garfield hit the nail on the head. very well spoken, and a very mature guy.
Garfield must have been selectively reading the criticisms. It's been spelled out in 50 foot high letters time and again all over the internet why TASM 2 was so bad. From the horrible camp factor, to the cluttered story, to the rushed plot points, to the awful villains, to the dreadfully dreary parents plot.
I'm glad he was taken aback by all the criticism (though I do pity him having his talents wasted in these low level movies). Hopefully Sony was, too.
At fist, maybe not. Like Oscorp said, he was motivated by fear. But I think he crossed the line from 'fearing for my life' to 'kind of evil'. He has very little sympathy at this point.Question: Is Harry Osborn evil?
This is another reason I love Garfield as Spider-man. He listens to the criticism, pays attention to it, and even pretty much says he wants to help make it better. All while admitting he had fun doing it.Garfield must have been selectively reading the criticisms. It's been spelled out in 50 foot high letters time and again all over the internet why TASM 2 was so bad. From the horrible camp factor, to the cluttered story, to the rushed plot points, to the awful villains, to the dreadfully dreary parents plot.
I'm glad he was taken aback by all the criticism (though I do pity him having his talents wasted in these low level movies). Hopefully Sony was, too.
Garfield must have been selectively reading the criticisms. It's been spelled out in 50 foot high letters time and again all over the internet why TASM 2 was so bad. From the horrible camp factor, to the cluttered story, to the rushed plot points, to the awful villains, to the dreadfully dreary parents plot.
I'm glad he was taken aback by all the criticism (though I do pity him having his talents wasted in these low level movies). Hopefully Sony was, too.
Garfield must have been selectively reading the criticisms. It's been spelled out in 50 foot high letters time and again all over the internet why TASM 2 was so bad. From the horrible camp factor, to the cluttered story, to the rushed plot points, to the awful villains, to the dreadfully dreary parents plot.
I'm glad he was taken aback by all the criticism (though I do pity him having his talents wasted in these low level movies). Hopefully Sony was, too.
He will know. Just like we know. But being publicly specific about what lead to the sh** would point the finger at a colleague. For instance, he might not want to say that Electro's the goofiest mofo in cb villain history, only rivaled by Arnold. It's not just Fox's fault. Why didn't Webb shout 'Cut! Jamie wtf are you doing?'
At least he acknowledged it's a turd that won't flush. I feel bad for him. He really wants it, but it's not working.
Okay, c'mon really? You're comparing Fox to Arnold, or TLJ's Two-Face, the random Nuclear bad-guy in Superman 4, Bullseye, Memphisto in the GR movies, Jim Carrey as the Riddler, or how about Ming the Merciless in Flash Gordon?
Again, I thought Jamie was a bit OTT, but how was what he did any more OTT than "Dock Ock turned bad by evil manipulating tentacles?"
#ShotsFired
I liked Electro... but Ock was better, imo.
Again, I thought Jamie was a bit OTT, but how was what he did any more OTT than "Dock Ock turned bad by evil manipulating tentacles?"
Okay, c'mon really? You're comparing Fox to Arnold, or TLJ's Two-Face, the random Nuclear bad-guy in Superman 4, Bullseye, Memphisto in the GR movies, Jim Carrey as the Riddler, or how about Ming the Merciless in Flash Gordon?
Again, I thought Jamie was a bit OTT, but how was what he did any more OTT than "Dock Ock turned bad by evil manipulating tentacles?"
sounds like garfield hit the nail on the head. very well spoken, and a very mature guy.
They noticed. That's why TASM3 has been delayed.
He will know. Just like we know. But being publicly specific about what lead to the sh** would point the finger at a colleague. For instance, he might not want to say that Electro's the goofiest mofo in cb villain history, only rivaled by Arnold. It's not just Fox's fault. Why didn't Webb shout 'Cut! Jamie wtf are you doing?'
At least he acknowledged it's a turd that won't flush. I feel bad for him. He really wants it, but it's not working.
Honestly, I don't understand the sentiment that this film was THAT bad. It wasn't. Now, it wasn't good, I will say that. The conflicting tones, the overcrowded nature, ect all of these keep it from being a good film. But it's nowhere near one of the worst superhero films made, or even anywhere near the bottom bunch. It was solidly a "meh" film.
But I can't see how people are harping on the camp factor...to me it was no worse than anything we saw in the Raimi films. It had moments that were almost as bad as the Raimi camp moments...and I'm exluding SM3 here, I'm talking about some of the horrible cheesiness in SM1 and ESPECIALLY SM2. But the camp didn't strike me as anything more than what we've already seen.
Again, I can understand people's intense reaction to this, because it is one of the most disappointing superhero films I've watched, but I think people are projecting that disappointment onto the actual quality.
Okay, c'mon really? You're comparing Fox to Arnold, or TLJ's Two-Face, the random Nuclear bad-guy in Superman 4, Bullseye, Memphisto in the GR movies, Jim Carrey as the Riddler, or how about Ming the Merciless in Flash Gordon?
Again, I thought Jamie was a bit OTT, but how was what he did any more OTT than "Dock Ock turned bad by evil manipulating tentacles?"
It's only a small minority handful of TASM fans that hold any of them in any kind of high esteem.