The Amazing Spider-Man The Amazing Spider-Man General Discussion & Speculation Thread - - - - - - P - - - Part 19

Status
Not open for further replies.
DarthSkywalker said:
Just like I said. Bullying, just at a 3rd grad level.
Click to expand...

NO I AM NOT! :D

bul·ly 1 (bl)
n. pl. bul·lies
1. A person who is habitually cruel or overbearing, especially to smaller or weaker people.
2. A hired ruffian; a thug.
3. A pimp.
4. Archaic A fine person.
5. Archaic A sweetheart.
v. bul·lied, bul·ly·ing, bul·lies
v.tr.
1. To treat in an overbearing or intimidating manner.
2. To make (one's way) aggressively.


Wait... maybe I am :doh:
 
guys to be fair, when I see a spider in the bathroom when I am doing my business, and then I look away for a couple seconds, the damn thing always disappears. Spider-man might be similar to the disappearing spider in his movement.
 
Eggyman said:
So you're saying you don't need to be told exactly how the guy with super powers entered rear of the vehicle?

I'm trying to be as fair as possible, but seriously, I'd have a problem with the film having Amazing in the title if the f***er's unable to get in the back of a car.

We used to have debates like: He's too strong! He can't stop trains in the comics! That fall should kill him!

Now we have this.

This is not The Very Average Backseat-Guy.
Click to expand...

What does super powers have to do with the noise car doors make?
 
GENERAL RAAM582 said:
Come on, tell me.
Click to expand...
Are you familiar with The Dark Knight? Well, in any case: there's the scene where the Joker is trying to provoke a cop into attacking him. He asks, "How many of your friends have I killed?" The cop eventually answers, "You killed six of my friends." And then the Joker mouths something. Depending on who you ask, the Joker mouths, "Six," as in, "Wow! I killed six!" or "Ten," as in, "Actually, I killed ten of your friends."

It's one of the dumbest debates I've ever witnessed.
 
Web face said:
guys to be fair, when I see a spider in the bathroom when I am doing my business, and then I look away for a couple seconds, the damn thing always disappears. Spider-man might be similar to the disappearing spider in his movement.
Click to expand...
Oh yeah its hard to sot them right away and its pretty creepy at the same time when you hope its not crawling on you LOL
 
Spider-Who? said:
I'm convinced that you actually aren't reading anyone's responses and are simply quoting them and regurgitating your "points", because I and others have clearly addressed them and yet you continue. Not so obvious troll is becoming obvious.
Click to expand...

I am fully aware of the possible explanation for how Spidey could have gotten into the car before the carjacker: that the carjacker's electronic device unlocked all the doors at once allowing for Spidey the opportunity for him to quickly and silently slip into backseat just as the car their was getting into it. Now, if the film showed all the doors being unlocked simultaneously--like say a shot of all the automatic door looks popping up and then showing the carjacker getting in--that would be fine because then the film is allowing for a plausible explanation for how Spidey could have gotten in there so fast. But as the clip currently stands and the way it is shot and edited, it makes it look like Spidey was already in the car before the carjacker unlocked it and got in. The very fact that we have to explain how Spidey could have possibly got in when the film doesn't is a problem, IMO.

As for how he got out, being that he opened his passenger door and quickly escaped based solely on hearing what sounds like a closing of a car door, it took me a second viewing of the clip in order for me to even get that because even though you can hear the sound you don't see the inside light coming on which should have happened if one is opening the car door. I get that the scene is trying to show Spidey is so fast he seems to appear and disappear with ease, but because of the way it's shot and edited, it leaves one initially asking all sorts of questions rather than just excepting it on face value. At least for me.

DarthSkywalker said:
No you aren't getting it. Clearly someone is asking that question, otherwise this wouldn't be a topic.

Also, as I said before, not a fan when films break their own logic and I am allowed that opinion. See the stupid goal post scene.

Using your logic you can have a very serious movie about child abuse that suddenly features a brawl between Godzilla and Optimus Prime, and it works. Why? Suspension of disbelief.
Click to expand...

Right. Suspension of disbelief doesn't mean one has to suspend ALL belief.

Mace Bloodstone said:
Unbelievable, :wow: does every superhero movie go through this ridiculous microscopic analysis?
Click to expand...

It does when the filmmakers themselves are making the claim that this is more "grounded" and "realistic" take on Spider-Man than the previous films.
 
DarthSkywalker said:
What does super powers have to do with the noise car doors make?
Click to expand...

You hear the car door open/close when he gets out. We don't hear him get in because he's already there when we join the scene. That's my last on this. No offence. That's as plain as I can make it.
 
Eddie Brock said:
Are you familiar with The Dark Knight? Well, in any case: there's the scene where the Joker is trying to provoke a cop into attacking him. He asks, "How many of your friends have I killed?" The cop eventually answers, "You killed six of my friends." And then the Joker mouths something. Depending on who you ask, the Joker mouths, "Six," as in, "Wow! I killed six!" or "Ten," as in, "Actually, I killed ten of your friends."

It's one of the dumbest debates I've ever witnessed.
Click to expand...
:lmao:
 
Web face said:
guys to be fair, when I see a spider in the bathroom when I am doing my business, and then I look away for a couple seconds, the damn thing always disappears. Spider-man might be similar to the disappearing spider in his movement.
Click to expand...

Not good enough of an explanation. I'll wait for the conclusion of Eggyman and the Mystery of the Silent Door. :oldrazz:
 
Guys seriously, might as well give up.

You have made great arguments on a subject that is ridiculous to begin with. Let us all move on, these two guys feel how they feel, they aren't gonna change their minds.
 
The last thing I'll say on this is: you can't attack the logic of a film based on 2 minutes out of context. We've already given the sound of the door closing as proof that he exited the car. As for how he entered it, we're left to postulate because we didn't see the preceding scenes.
 
stillanerd said:
I am fully aware of the possible explanation for how Spidey could have gotten into the car before the carjacker: that the carjacker's electronic device unlocked all the doors at once allowing for Spidey the opportunity for him to quickly and silently slip into backseat just as the car their was getting into it. Now, if the film showed all the doors being unlocked simultaneously--like say a shot of all the automatic door looks popping up and then showing the carjacker getting in--that would be fine because then the film is allowing for a plausible explanation for how Spidey could have gotten in there so fast. But as the clip currently stands and the way it is shot and edited, it makes it look like Spidey was already in the car before the carjacker unlocked it and got in. The very fact that we have to explain how Spidey could have possibly got in when the film doesn't is a problem, IMO.

As for how he got out, being that he opened his passenger door and quickly escaped based solely on hearing what sounds like a closing of a car door, it took me a second viewing of the clip in order for me to even get that because even though you can hear the sound you don't see the inside light coming on which should have happened if one is opening the car door. I get that the scene is trying to show Spidey is so fast he seems to appear and disappear with ease, but because of the way it's shot and edited, it leaves one initially asking all sorts of questions rather than just excepting it on face value. At least for me.



Right. Suspension of disbelief doesn't mean one has to suspend ALL belief.



It does when the filmmakers themselves are making the claim that this is more "grounded" and "realistic" take on Spider-Man than the previous films.
Click to expand...


You must be so much fun at a party! lol :D
 
That car scene is about 40 minutes into the film. As soon as it's over, f*** the rest of the film, I'm coming home and sorting this out!
 
stillanerd said:
I am fully aware of the possible explanation for how Spidey could have gotten into the car before the carjacker: that the carjacker's electronic device unlocked all the doors at once allowing for Spidey the opportunity for him to quickly and silently slip into backseat just as the car their was getting into it. Now, if the film showed all the doors being unlocked simultaneously--like say a shot of all the automatic door looks popping up and then showing the carjacker getting in--that would be fine because then the film is allowing for a plausible explanation for how Spidey could have gotten in there so fast. But as the clip currently stands and the way it is shot and edited, it makes it look like Spidey was already in the car before the carjacker unlocked it and got in. The very fact that we have to explain how Spidey could have possibly got in when the film doesn't is a problem, IMO.
Click to expand...

This response PROVES that you aren't reading peoples responses, because that is NOT the point anyone is making about when/how spidey got in the car. For petes sake dude, freaking READ.
 
Eddie Brock said:
Are you familiar with The Dark Knight? Well, in any case: there's the scene where the Joker is trying to provoke a cop into attacking him. He asks, "How many of your friends have I killed?" The cop eventually answers, "You killed six of my friends." And then the Joker mouths something. Depending on who you ask, the Joker mouths, "Six," as in, "Wow! I killed six!" or "Ten," as in, "Actually, I killed ten of your friends."

It's one of the dumbest debates I've ever witnessed.
Click to expand...

Oh. Yeah, he definitely lip said "six".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

T
  • Locked
The Amazing Spider-Man The Amazing Spider-Man General Discussion & Speculation Thread - - - - - - P
38 39 40
Replies
976
Views
27K
Thread Manager
T
T
  • Locked
The Amazing Spider-Man The Amazing Spider-Man General Discussion & Speculation Thread - - - - - - P - - Part 18
37 38 39
Replies
961
Views
36K
Thread Manager
T
T
  • Locked
The Amazing Spider-Man The Amazing Spider-Man General Discussion & Speculation Thread - - - - - - P - Part 17
37 38 39
Replies
964
Views
26K
Thread Manager
T
T
  • Locked
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - - - - - - - - - - Part 19
38 39 40
Replies
998
Views
24K
Thread Manager
T
Avenging Spidey
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 The Amazing Spider-Man 2 World Premiere
2
Replies
47
Views
3K
Neno_Kos
Neno_Kos

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Staff online

Members online

Total: 2,137 (members: 32, guests: 2,105)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,277
Messages
22,078,940
Members
45,879
Latest member
vrlex

Share this page

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"