Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]360421[/split]
James Cameron's "scriptment" became the basis of David Koepp's first-draft screenplay, often word for word. Cameron's versions of the Marvel villains Electro and Sandman remained the antagonists. Koepp's rewrite substituted the Green Goblin as the primary antagonist and added Doctor Octopus as a secondary villain. Raimi felt the Green Goblin and the surrogate father-son theme between Norman Osborn and Peter Parker would be more interesting. In June, Columbia hired Scott Rosenberg to rewrite of Koepp's material. Remaining a constant in all the rewrites was the "organic webshooter" idea from the Cameron "scriptment". Raimi felt he would stretch the audience's suspension of disbelief too far to have Peter invent mechanical webshooters.
Rosenberg removed Doctor Octopus and created several new action sequences. Raimi felt adding a third origin story would make the film too complex. Sequences removed from the final film had Spider-Man protecting Fargas, the wheelchair-using Oscorp executive from the Goblin, and Spider-Man defusing a hostage situation on a train.
Green Goblin and Doc Ock COULD work...I mean, it was thought of for Spider-Man at first...
So...Raimi's big deal with not using Doc Ock was not wanting to work in a third origin story, so Otto taking part of Norman using the serum could work in both ways with having one basis of both villain's "origins" and then from there on, develop Doc OCk and how such an accident cause Otto's tentacle and harness to "meld" into him(perhaps he used those arms with the serum outside of some area where Norman was in).
IMHO if they are going to use GG in any of the sequels (which face it they will) they better be pushing Gwen Stacy off of a bridge too. I feel like using Doc Ock and Green Goblin in the same film is a bad idea. Just b/c they are 2 of spidey's 3 greatest enemies, (3rd being Venom). Their just too big to be in the same movie together, and if you use them both one of them will ultimately be overshadowed by the other. Think Joker and Two Face in TDK. Then again, use them both and you could kill off Captain Stacy and Gwen Stacy, if your into that kinda thing.
I thought that Joker and Two-Face were well utilized in The Dark Knight.
That would make sense. This could be a case where borrowing from Ultimate Spider-Man is a good idea, so that you have multiple villains from a single origin like Green Goblin and Doctor Octopus in said Ultimate universe.
I thought that Joker and Two-Face were well utilized in The Dark Knight.
Exactly. If any two villains can become their monikers in the same origin, it'd be those two, imo. I could see it work perfectly and then GG and Ock are developed afterwards...plus, I always imagined that a scene in the end could be Green Goblin v Doctor Octopus
That'll just blow my mind with its epicness.
And....both Stacys don't have to die by their respected villains, imo. I mean, Captain Stacy could die in the first film, or second and what I really care about is seeing the death of Gwen Stacy, imo.
They were equally utilized. Joker was a force to be reckoned with from beginning to the very end as he created pretty much everything that we saw on film and even created Two-Face himself in a way, BUT...the name The Dark Knight itself represented Harvey as much as Batman so in no way did Harvey Dent become overshadowed. Joker was the interim from Batman and Dent as Dent was slowly fading into the darkness and finally saw himself become the villain. If any character was overshadowed, it was Batman.
I don't think Batman was really overshadowed, but I agree that Joker and Two Face were equally well utilized.
Green Goblin. Though I wouldn't mind to see Shocker as a lesser villain. I'd really like to see his costume become a reality.
Yes^ That sounds cool. Like I've said a few times I really want to see Norman behind the scenes in a Kingpin like role for the first couple movies, where he maybe has ties to the mob and is doing things like hiring people to try to take out Spiderman. Make him a villain before he becomes a supervillain and then bring on the transformation in the third or fourth movie.
So having him be a totally messed up psychopath/sociopath might be preferrable, and I think seeing him put on a public facade might be cool. This would create good tension if the actor plays it right when we know he's doing all these bad things, but Peter doesn't know.
I'd like Norman to hire a lesser villain to get Spidey, and after a couple of failed attempts he turns up as the Goblin mid battle, kills the lesser villain (showing straight away that he isn't one to f*** with) and then spends a few minutes kicking the living sh** out of Spidey.
Then: 'He stole that guys pumpkins!'
'My kidney stones are tingling.'
MJ, on the street, looking at Spidey, says, 'Face it tiger, you just ripped your costume.'
Spidey pulls out a gun and shoots MJ and says, 'Now you're really and angel!'
'We'll meet again, Spider-MAAAAAAAAn.' Then the Goblin flies home to stick his fingers in some pies and some cakes.
Spidey, crying, says, 'Sucks to be you. WHAT have I done?! MaaaAAARRy JAAaaaaaA-- O, chocolate cake.'
--
Okay, only the first paragraph was real and everything else was a JD moment.