TheBatman072
Avenger
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2007
- Messages
- 10,610
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
So desperate for news that we start believing **************.
Unbelievable.
Unbelievable.
Regarding why the Wayne manor used in BB cannot be used anymore:
They only need the outside, not its interior (although they used parts of its interior in BB which they could replicate in a studio if all else failed).Regarding why the Wayne manor used in BB cannot be used anymore:
I've got audio of the Michael Caine interview in case you missed it live:
http://batman-news.com/2011/06/10/m...ight-rises-on-the-chris-evans-breakfast-show/
I like the new Wayne Manor, looks good to me. Atleast it's not far off as far as the look of the building from what we got in BB.
I've got audio of the Michael Caine interview in case you missed it live:
http://batman-news.com/2011/06/10/m...ight-rises-on-the-chris-evans-breakfast-show/
**************.com is like FOX News.

I've got audio of the Michael Caine interview in case you missed it live:
http://batman-news.com/2011/06/10/m...ight-rises-on-the-chris-evans-breakfast-show/
you forgot the funny comparison![]()
Thanks, I'll have to listen to it when I get the chance.I've got audio of the Michael Caine interview in case you missed it live:
http://batman-news.com/2011/06/10/m...ight-rises-on-the-chris-evans-breakfast-show/
**************.com is like FOX News.
They both have the best ratings????![]()
Not really a fan of FOX, but everyone else is just as biased. Fox just happens to be biased towards the right. The other 90% of the media is biased towards the left. Get off your high horse, everyone's biased. I watch a little bit of everything and read the newspaper and do my own research to form my own opinions, but there is no point in singling out one news station for being biased when every other news station is just as biased, just the other way.
He's not talking about Fox News being biased. He's saying they are full of ****, lies, and religion freaks...
EDIT: Knowing Nolan's style, If Batman gets broken, I bet it is during the beginning and the second act is mostly flashbacks to what lead to the breaking battle, while he recovers and then act III is set in present time as he returns to "rise".
Everyone else is full of **** and lies as well. News stations make up "****" and lies to help their side. It goes hand and hand with being biased, which everyone is. Wouldn't know about the religion freaks. I go to church for religion, not the news.
I agree. I can see Nolan doing this. Or something similar to The Prestige's timeline.
Are you Glenn Beck?
Anyways, let's get back to Batman.
Reminder, if it didn't come from Nolan & Co. or Batman-News, then don't believe it...
Honestly, this is the best way to go because then we would have Batman in every act.
ACT I- Batman finds Bane gets Broken
ACT II- Batman is seen in many of the flashbacks of what lead to the "breaking"
ACT III- Batman rises.
If the film is 100% linear and Bat's Back is still broken we most likely will get this:
ACT I- Batman being Bats as Bane Rises
ACT II- Batman gets broken during the beginning of the ACT, leading most of ACT II Batman-less
ACT III- Bruce continues to heal and becomes Batman near the end of the ACT, leading a solid bit of the ACT III Batman-less
Now I think Nolan can make a great Batman film even if Batman is absent for a strong chunk of the film, but it certainly won't be easy. Of course his back could be broken at the end....
Maybe Bruce getting his back broken is the big action opening to the movie. After that everything is non-linear.
Now I think Nolan can make a great Batman film even if Batman is absent for a strong chunk of the film, but it certainly won't be easy.
Both BB and TDK had the same percentage of Batman screen time.Nolan already has made a great Batman film where Batman was absent for a strong chunk of the film - Batman Begins.