Ramsay Snow
Winter's Saviour
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2011
- Messages
- 7,593
- Reaction score
- 16
- Points
- 58
Maybe it means Tuesday for the UK and similar time zones.
Just like the fact that Ra's Al Ghul died on that train: Up until we learned that TDKR is set 8 years after TDK, I advocated that Nolan never made Ra's mortal. He just didn't blatantly say he's immortal and, should TDKR finish with Batman still fighting the good fight, we could assume he'd come back. Now that this is thrown out of the window (speculation), I can say that Nolan's been more unfaithful in his portrayal of Ra's than in his portrayal of Scarecrow.
But does it ruin Nicholson's version for you? Now that you know?
UK have a different "Online" to America? I didn't notice thisMaybe it means Tuesday for the UK and similar time zones.

The 20th?? Dammit, WTH?
@Cyborg Ninja:
Purely conjecture on your part, as well.
There's no denying that TDK was a stellar film, however, claiming that TDKR won't top TDK simply because you harbor hatred for Bane sounds like a personal opinion rather than a fact.
I think it all depends on the preconceived idea. For example, if I thought Jokers much older than Batman then a much older than Batman Joker was a norm for me and I got used to that for decades the change so late wont really mean anything. Its always largely about personal perspective
t:Yeah, I mean I never thought Nolan would use Bane (and I was also a bit against him, tbh), but it's all about the themes and the context. If Nolan has found a way to use him effectively, why the heck not, I say.
Batman needed a physical challenge.
the physical challenge.
I cannot hold all these buzzwords.
The Fire Rises.
Everyone repeat the fire rises, and put it in your user titles and signatures.

Sure it's an opinion, but let's not go the route of "My opinion is better than your opinion," which you seem to enjoy doing.
Again, you seem like a sleeper agent for WB, just collecting checks for openly promoting Bane.

Which I'm doing?
That's funny... considering I never implied that logic. In fact, I haven't made that statement once. Check my history.
I responded to a comment from the 'Nolan's Fans' board regarding the criticism of TDKR's trailer. It was my opinion and my right to criticize their criticism.
TDKR trailer had similar elements from TDK's trailer, so imagine my surprise when a few hyperbolic and/or bitter fanboys basically stated that this trailer was multifarious to decipher, and WB's only agenda was to promote Tom Hardy, and failed (apparently).
Yes, all the sudden, I'm the optimist.![]()
Which I'm doing?
That's funny... considering I never implied that logic. In fact, I haven't made that statement once. Check my history.
I responded to a comment from the 'Nolan's Fans' board regarding the criticism of TDKR's trailer. It was my opinion and my right to criticize their criticism.
TDKR trailer had similar elements from TDK's trailer, so imagine my surprise when a few hyperbolic and/or bitter fanboys basically stated that this trailer was multifarious to decipher, and WB's only agenda was to promote Tom Hardy, and failed (apparently).
Yes, all the sudden, I'm the optimist.![]()
Stay classy with your Anne Hathawayism. That's one way to make people take you seriously.
And people take you seriously? I'm still trying to figure out why you come here, besides trying to stir things up from your parents basement.
Stay classy with your Anne Hathawayism. That's one way to make people take you seriously.

haha, so cliche, so pathetic.
