king666
Sidekick
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2013
- Messages
- 3,394
- Reaction score
- 678
- Points
- 73
So, yeah... Levi is staying.
I think it means they're recasting everyone, including The Suicide Squad.
So, yeah... Levi is staying.
So, yeah... Levi is staying.
I'd just about forgotten about himRay Fisher is chiming in again lol.
What's he been saying?He’s taking shots at James Gunn.I'd just about forgotten about himWhat's he been saying?
It's a Cuuuult!While I understand that the Snyderfans and other fans were disappointed about Henry's exit from the role (and how it was handled), this need to rewrite history and make Henry and his Superman more popular than he actually was and pretend that it is this massive mistake to let him go, as if he was RDJ Iron Man levels of popular, is really embarrassing. Be angry and disappointed, but don't act like the mass audience is going to care.
Absolutely. I'd apply that to any iconic character; Batman, Dracula, Sherlock Homes, James Bond, etcThe character of superman is bigger than any one actor.
What's funny is some of the same people acting mad about Cavill's exit were mad at him for the Black Adam cameo and how it was disrespectful to Zack Snyder because the suit wasn't black, he had the spit curl and used to Williams theme.
It seems to be when characters receive their first big interpretation that people think the actors are irreplaceable. I remember back when Connery quit as Bond. People were seriously saying 'That's it, Bond's finished without Connery. There'll be no more', but of course that wasn't true. And in time there'll be another Tony Stark, another Steve Rogers, etc. The only possible exception I can see is where a character was basically created around the actor playing them, such as Johnny Depp/Jack Sparrow.The Avengers too, as hard as it is for some folks to believe right now.
Yeah, like I can see this also being applied to Indiana Jones, since we've had Harrison Ford in the role for over 40 years now, but...you never know. I could see an Indy reboot happening some day, easily.It seems to be when characters receive their first big interpretation that people think the actors are irreplaceable. I remember back when Connery quit as Bond. People were seriously saying 'That's it, Bond's finished without Connery. There'll be no more', but of course that wasn't true. And in time there'll be another Tony Stark, another Steve Rogers, etc. The only possible exception I can see is where a character was basically created around the actor playing them, such as Johnny Depp/Jack Sparrow.
Ray Fisher is chiming in again lol.
Never realized how small the opening for Bale's cowl was.These roles are meant to passed down from generation to generation .
Christopher Reeve said that he considered himself a temporary custodian of the Superman role, while he had it.
That's what I think of every actor who's donned the Batman and Zorro cowls, put on the Red S, put on the tux as Bond, etc.
I know there are fans nowadays who don't like the idea of recasts , but for me , it's a positive thing to see these characters carry on after an actor or actress has vacated the role.
It doesn't end just because an actor leaves the role.
The mantle goes on to the next actor or next generation , and then they do their own thing with it.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
If he was that popular, then the movies would have made more moneyWhile I understand that the Snyderfans and other fans were disappointed about Henry's exit from the role (and how it was handled), this need to rewrite history and make Henry and his Superman more popular than he actually was and pretend that it is this massive mistake to let him go, as if he was RDJ Iron Man levels of popular, is really embarrassing. Be angry and disappointed, but don't act like the mass audience is going to care.
If he was that popular, then the movies would have made more money
He’s taking shots at James Gunn.
.