The Expendables 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
They could pull off a PG-13 and still have it be violent. I don't care about profanity and the cgi blood looked terrible. However I want to see them push the envelope. We need as much brutality as we can get.
 
Stranger things have happened but I find it a little weird that they'd just go along with a ridiculous demand like this. I find it more likely someone would tell Chuck to get bent. It's not like his presence is critical.

And I'm not one to harp on about ratings and I don't often demand or expect an R but this is pretty goddamn stupid. Sure, we have no problems showing people being shot, stabbed, exploded and dismembered but for God's sake don't let the kids hear the eff word!
 
No ones saying he had control over sly. He said he wouldn't do it if it was an R film and Sly abliged him and chose to make it PG-13. Key being that Sly did it because he wanted Norris in his film. No where does it say anyone was forced to do it. At this point it comes down to how bad Sly wants Norris in the film. If its a lot then we are looking at a PG-13 film.

Well then my arguement is…is Norris really worth it?

I mean i'll say upfront that I was one of the few people who DIDN'T want him in the movie for the simple reason that he's become a joke.

Yeah yeah, I know, he's an 80s action star as well but c'mon, with all the Chuck Norris meme's and Conan O' Brien clips of "Walker Texas Ranger" back then, the guy is a walking parody of his former self.

…and yet I Sly thinks he's that important for the film that he's willing to waterdown a film with the greatest collection of action movie stars for the sake of ONE MAN? :huh:
 
Well, this is Sly's pet project; his baby. If he feels that the movie would be better with Chuck Norris, and that it won't suffer with a lower rating, who are we to really question his vision?
 
Well then my arguement is…is Norris really worth it?

I mean i'll say upfront that I was one of the few people who DIDN'T want him in the movie for the simple reason that he's become a joke.

Yeah yeah, I know, he's an 80s action star as well but c'mon, with all the Chuck Norris meme's and Conan O' Brien clips of "Walker Texas Ranger" back then, the guy is a walking parody of his former self.

…and yet I Sly thinks he's that important for the film that he's willing to waterdown a film with the greatest collection of action movie stars for the sake of ONE MAN? :huh:

I feel the same way as you. Chuck Norris is a parody of himself today, and I never wanted him in these films so id prefer an R rating to chuck Norris.

And to those saying a PG-13 rating would be just fine is missing the principal. The first film was a throwback to 80s action movies. Those movies were rated R and violent. This movie needs to be R and violent otherwise its just another watered down action movie. The market is flooded with those.
 
And to those saying a PG-13 rating would be just fine is missing the principal. The first film was a throwback to 80s action movies. Those movies were rated R and violent. This movie needs to be R and violent otherwise its just another watered down action movie. The market is flooded with those.
Agreed.

I know Live Free or Die Hard inexplicably gets love from a lot of people but I think that the PG:13 rating along with the bad writing and directing killed it. Old school 80's action movies are supposed to be R rated. Robocop was terrible as a PG:13 rated movie. Granted Robocop 3 would have been crap without it but it would have been more watchable than it was.
 
I feel the same way as you. Chuck Norris is a parody of himself today, and I never wanted him in these films so id prefer an R rating to chuck Norris.

And to those saying a PG-13 rating would be just fine is missing the principal. The first film was a throwback to 80s action movies. Those movies were rated R and violent. This movie needs to be R and violent otherwise its just another watered down action movie. The market is flooded with those.

Same here. In fact, Chuck Norris is the main reason I'm not particularly excited about this movie. Can't stand the guy... can't act for sh**, he's too old to be a believable badass anymore and his idiotic political antics have made him even more of a joke.
 
If the movie really is PG-13 I wonder if fans will campaign for an R-rated cut. It'll be ridiculous if Stallone gives in to Norris, the latter of whom has never been on the same level of fame as most of the other Action stars and has become such a joke these days.
 
he's too old to be a believable badass anymore...
Chuck Norris 3/10/1940 71 years old
Clint Eastwood 5/31/1930 81 years old

Chuck is ten years younger than Eastwood! And anyone who thinks Eastwood is too old to be a believable bad ass, needs to go watch Grand Torino!! Which, by the way, he made at age 78.
 
time to cut out chuck...add eastwood. have him walk around with a revolver and call it a day.

pg13 means no random ****...no buckets of blood....hardly any rememberable one liners. why you ruining my cheese fest norris....
 
I feel the same way as you. Chuck Norris is a parody of himself today, and I never wanted him in these films so id prefer an R rating to chuck Norris.

And to those saying a PG-13 rating would be just fine is missing the principal. The first film was a throwback to 80s action movies. Those movies were rated R and violent. This movie needs to be R and violent otherwise its just another watered down action movie. The market is flooded with those.
:up:


Just look at the ages of the cast. This movie isn't for the younger crowd anyway, it was never meant to cater to them.
 
Exactly. The movie is made for fans who grew up on 80s Action movies, it shouldn't be neutered to be more marketable to modern audiences. The first movie did as well as it did commercially without being watered down.
 
eh, ultimately meaningless in every aspect to everyone's daily lives, but befuddling nonetheless.

There's a Chuck norris joke in here somewhere.
 
"The PG13 rumor is true," Stallone writes, "but before your readers pass judgement, trust me when I say this film is LARGE in every way and delivers on every level. This movie touches on many emotions which we want to share with the broadest audience possible, BUT, fear not, this Barbeque of Grand scale Ass Bashing will not leave anyone hungry."

I love Sly but I think he's going to have a hard time selling this choice to the hardcore faithful that championed his return to the big screen.
 
They could pull off a PG-13 and still have it be violent. I don't care about profanity and the cgi blood looked terrible. However I want to see them push the envelope. We need as much brutality as we can get.



I agree. Just as long as there is no CGI blood this time around, which from what I hear, there will be makeup blood. I can accept a PG-13 film.

Even though by all rights this film should rated R and we need to hear these bad asses cussing and swearing! :word:
 
Well folks, we have another Chuck Norris fact:

Chuck Norris made The Expendables 2 a PG-13 film.
 
Well then my arguement is…is Norris really worth it?

I mean i'll say upfront that I was one of the few people who DIDN'T want him in the movie for the simple reason that he's become a joke.

Yeah yeah, I know, he's an 80s action star as well but c'mon, with all the Chuck Norris meme's and Conan O' Brien clips of "Walker Texas Ranger" back then, the guy is a walking parody of his former self.

…and yet I Sly thinks he's that important for the film that he's willing to waterdown a film with the greatest collection of action movie stars for the sake of ONE MAN? :huh:

To be fair, most of the guys in these films are jokes at this point.
 
Like somebody said on AICN, some exec realized how big a meme Chuck Norris is with the hipster teen set, and basically wanted them to get in on the action.
 
Well folks, we have another Chuck Norris fact:

Chuck Norris made The Expendables 2 a PG-13 film.


Here's another fact: Chuck Norris has the power to make any movie a PG-13 because he said so :dry:

I'll probably still see this, but damn, what a disappointment :doh:
 
1562845_o.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"