I think you just need to learn objective criticism, dude. People who say TDK or Avengers was the worst movie of all time with nothing redeeming about them because they as an individual didn't like them are simply unable to see the appeal of something that appeals to someone else. One of the great things about being a human being is being able to see things from someone else's point of view.
I don't care what anyone else's point of view is. I was stating my own subjective evaluation of it, and I labeled it as such. The person I was responding to did not. I found almost everything about it to be well below par. The music choices, the acting, the writing, the dialogue, the heavy handed foreshadowing, the entirely inconsistent tone, and the camera work are all things I do not like about the show.
It looks like both shows lost about 1/8th of their audience each week for the first three weeks. Unless the fourth week continues the downward trend, we can pretty much conclude that more people will continue to enjoy Gotham than watch Arrow. This is not measure of comparative quality, but when you see that 6 million people are continuing to watch a show and your conclusion is 'there's nothing good about the show, they're all stupid' then maybe you just don't understand entertainment.
First of all, it should be pretty obvious I wasn't comparing its overall viewership with that of Arrow's. Batman is many orders of magnitude more popular than Green Arrow, Arrow is on a network that is co-owned by DC's parent company, the expectations on CW are much lower versus Fox, and I would imagine Gotham has a much higher budget.
And I never called any of Gotham's fans stupid. I was responding to the declarative statement that both AoS and Gotham were "solid, quality wise". If other people like the show, great. I hope they enjoy it. But a large number of people liking something is not an indication of objective quality, if there can even be such a thing in the realm of art. Tens of millions of people buy Call of Duty every year, and in my opinion those games are awful. I'm not accusing people who do like them of being stupid or having poor taste, I'm challenging the notion that popularity equates to quality.
As for Gotham's trend:
8.21m->7.45m is a decline of about 760,000, or ~9.3%. 7.45m->6.36m is a decline of about 1.09m, or ~14.6%.
Arrow:
4.14m->3.55m is a decline of 590,000, or about 14.3%. 3.55m->3.05m is a decline of 500,000, or about 14.1%.
My point: Arrow's drop between the episodes was about the same, then it rebounded a bit in week 4. The decline from episode 2 to 3 of Gotham was much bigger than the one from episode 1 to 2. Like I said, it isn't enough to call it a trend yet. My point was not that Gotham is in trouble, but rather, that we have to wait and see.