Strong words, Nivek; not that I disagree entirely.In case you didn't notice, these are comic book characters, on a comic book based movie board. Interpretation or not, I'm coming from the background of reading the source material, not reworking the character to what I think makes him "kewl and serial killah Evil". The Joker hasn't changed that drastically over 70 years, and it's pretty obvious that "fans" like you will just move along to whatever floats your boat next when you find that the Joker is closer to what I know him as than the Crow/Marilyn Manson character with a butcher knife you see in your head.
Personally all I needed was his sense of humor. I can look past the superficial stuff like the skin not being bleached. I was very concerned they’d make him overly-serious. I know I wasn’t alone. But in the end, the more they show, the more they've been putting humorous characteristics and dialogue on displayed. If he was just a straight-up homicidal maniac then I’d be ridiculously disappointed because that’s a very one-dimensional assessment of the Jokers character. It’s lacking the personality and charisma of the character. Murder doesn’t sum him up whatsoever. That's just what he does. It's how he murders that makes the Joker. Homicidal psychopaths are a dime a dozen in comic books. There isn’t anything inherently original about that. You must retain his sense of humor to make him unique, to keep him arguably the greatest comic book villain ever made. But naturally you cannot have him be a harmless trickster either. You must achieve that level of symmetry between clown and killer. I was once worried Nolan went too far with the dark, but now I see the jokes and gags immerging in newer clips. I’m very pleased.

Maybe this post would have a point if the people arguing for the bleached skin ever stated that it would ruin the film for them, or that they would never see it solely because of it.It's really a waste of time now reading these boards, all the kids crying about the non-bleached vs the make up is just lame and boring. I find it funny because all of you are STILL going to watch the movie and love it. Not like it matters but I'm done with these, "I've read all the important Joker comics 100 times and I know the real Joker more than any of you nubs!" TROLLS
Whine all you want but you'll be there opening day with your friends gobbling up popcorn, soda and TDK merchandise like the rest of us. So in the end, HeathJoker > you.
So would anyone be open to the idea of (should Joker be carted away to Arkham at the end of this one) it's revealed in the next that Heath's Joker was a puppet for the real joker, or a crazed acolyte of the real Joker who took the fall for Mr.J? This would allow for a seamless recasting (although, granted, may be a bit disrespectful to the Joker Heath created, as it makes him seem like a goon for the real deal.)
Anyway, related thought - would anyone be up for Daniel Day Lewis taking over the Joker role? He's said to be a huge fan of Heath's and this seems like the kind of character he could really sink his teeth into.
Joker: "I DRINK BATMAN'S MILKSHAKE!"
You must achieve that level of symmetry between clown and killer.
I now have a new addition to my sig thanks to you. That sums up the Joker for me.
I'm personally sick of hearing their names. They're not the only two good actors out there, people. It's just ones we know. If there ever were a recast, it would be highly unlikely to be anybody we think of. Heath's casting is proof of that.People are riding on JGL solely because of his resemblance to Heath. Being a "good actor" isn't enough here. I'm a fan of his as well, but he doesn't have anywhere near the range or fearlessness that would be required to immerse yourself in this role.
With that said, of the "name" actors in the biz, Depp and DDL are definitely my top candidates. Age is certainly not a factor since that make-up creates an entirely new face anyway. I know for Heath, it added a couple of years to his face.