JP
Smelly
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2005
- Messages
- 60,839
- Reaction score
- 1,056
- Points
- 103
You know, so far this movie is having some pretty crappy casting. Hopefully it'll get better as it goes on.
what do mean crappy?
Huston is damn good( go see The Proposition), along with the unlikely Liev and the hot Morgan.
Surprising....
Isn't he doing Dexter? It could be that Wolverine's schedule conflicted with the show's.I was really liking the idea of Hall, (I wonder, (if the rumors of him being mentioned were true) if they changed their minds on him, if he turned it down, or if he just wasn't available ??)anyway, Huston could work, too
That process is way too time consuming and (i imagine) very expensive too.Sure it's fine for a 2 minute scene like in X3 but an entire movie? As much as liked Cox i think you're better off spending that kind of money on a younger actor.Spider-Fan83 you bring up a good point.
They went too old with this guy. They shoulda just rejuvenized Brian Cox the way they did with Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen in the beginning of X3. The process they used worked great at shaving off 20 years.
-TL
Surprising....
I had my eyes set on Hall but Huston is a good actor and i can see him as Stryker.
I think Huston was in The Fountain with Jackman. So they already know each other which is a plus.
Thanks. Don't know why i must have mistaken him for one of the doctors in that movie.
Brian Cox was born in 1946. Danny Huston was born in 1962. 16 years difference.The movie is 15 years before X2.... don't think this guy is too old at all.
Brian Cox was born in 1946. Danny Huston was born in 1962. 16 years difference.
Spider-Fan83 you bring up a good point.
They went too old with this guy. They shoulda just rejuvenized Brian Cox the way they did with Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen in the beginning of X3. The process they used worked great at shaving off 20 years.
-TL