DACrowe
Avenger
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2000
- Messages
- 30,765
- Reaction score
- 624
- Points
- 78
MAJOR SPOILERS IN THE FOLLOWING
Well I saw it last night. Not much, as I expected, but it was BETTER than the second. Still I can only call the first one in the series a good movie.
I saw the ending coming, but hey it gave us some great character development in Jigsaw. I also really enjoyed the tension of the father choosing to forgive and avenge, though when the judge got shot in the face after being saved, just so he can die, really irked me much like them killing of Dina Meyer's cool character for no good reason (and yes the reason Jigsaw gave for a cop dedicated to solving murders was bull****, which is why he didn't touch her in the second movie).
But the gore got ****ing ridiculous. The first was a good suspensful and SURPRISING thriller. The second was a dumb slasher movie. And this is a very entertaining and somewhat suspensful snuff movie. How much further can they take the gore.
Really SUPER DUPER SPOILERS NOW
Well I saw it last night. Not much, as I expected, but it was BETTER than the second. Still I can only call the first one in the series a good movie.
I saw the ending coming, but hey it gave us some great character development in Jigsaw. I also really enjoyed the tension of the father choosing to forgive and avenge, though when the judge got shot in the face after being saved, just so he can die, really irked me much like them killing of Dina Meyer's cool character for no good reason (and yes the reason Jigsaw gave for a cop dedicated to solving murders was bull****, which is why he didn't touch her in the second movie).
But the gore got ****ing ridiculous. The first was a good suspensful and SURPRISING thriller. The second was a dumb slasher movie. And this is a very entertaining and somewhat suspensful snuff movie. How much further can they take the gore.
Really SUPER DUPER SPOILERS NOW
Anyway, the most interesting thing to me is the ending. I saw the Amanda dying (hated how she went from a great character in the first two to a scene chewing villainess whose death you saw from the first frame, albeit it gave Jigsaw sometime for some nice development) and the husband killing his wife when killing Jigsaw, but the kid threw me for a nice loop. And on the whole the movie while gratutitous kept me on the edge of my seat half the time, something Saw II failed to do miserably and made Jigsaw much more interesting to watch.
HOWEVER, I think I can predict the TWIST for Saw IV (and yes, given this ending THERE WILL BE A SAW IV). And before you ask how can there be a Saw IV without a villain, well we never saw Jigsaw until the last 5 seconds of the superior Saw I. Anyway, the third movie seemed to wrap up all the loose ends. We saw how Adam died. We saw the end of the cop from the second, Dina Meyer was uncermoneously written out of the series and of course Amanda and Jigsaw are now going to be pushing up daisies.
BUT WHO SAYS JIGSAW ONLY HAD ONE ACCOMPLISE IN THE SEQUELS? Some of this stuff may have been too high-tech for Amanda. And besides that there is one character that not once has been said to be "dead" and we never saw what happened to him once in the whole movie. I'm talking about LAWERENCE GORDON. Lynn never referred to Gordon as dead, nor did she ever say otherwise when speaking of him. All we've seen is a foot. We saw Amanda go back and finish off Adam but no showing of Gordon. In fact, the first movie ended ambiguously enough to what happened to Gordon (he probably bled to death but his body isn't in the house with Adam and that other guy, nor is his death ever mentioned or shown).
I'm not saying it's a good idea, and most people will not like it, but the twist ending of Saw IV is DR. GORDON is the new Jigsaw.
HOWEVER, I think I can predict the TWIST for Saw IV (and yes, given this ending THERE WILL BE A SAW IV). And before you ask how can there be a Saw IV without a villain, well we never saw Jigsaw until the last 5 seconds of the superior Saw I. Anyway, the third movie seemed to wrap up all the loose ends. We saw how Adam died. We saw the end of the cop from the second, Dina Meyer was uncermoneously written out of the series and of course Amanda and Jigsaw are now going to be pushing up daisies.
BUT WHO SAYS JIGSAW ONLY HAD ONE ACCOMPLISE IN THE SEQUELS? Some of this stuff may have been too high-tech for Amanda. And besides that there is one character that not once has been said to be "dead" and we never saw what happened to him once in the whole movie. I'm talking about LAWERENCE GORDON. Lynn never referred to Gordon as dead, nor did she ever say otherwise when speaking of him. All we've seen is a foot. We saw Amanda go back and finish off Adam but no showing of Gordon. In fact, the first movie ended ambiguously enough to what happened to Gordon (he probably bled to death but his body isn't in the house with Adam and that other guy, nor is his death ever mentioned or shown).
I'm not saying it's a good idea, and most people will not like it, but the twist ending of Saw IV is DR. GORDON is the new Jigsaw.