Only one bad review out of the top critics so far. You do the math, by the time this gets over 200 reviews, which it should have, it should stay above 90%.
The streak of negative reviews just ended at 3 with another positive added.
As was noted in the comments over there, it's obvious that "top critic" is looking for publicity by going against 90% of the critics out there. Apparently, he's know for it. Critics that make up their minds BEFORE they see it and WANT to hate because they are sick of the genre will be a problem all summer. I choose to pay attention to the Richard Roeper's of the world and not these jaded wannabes.
Yeah, it's all a big conspiracy. Different opinions are a myth.
I agree, those transitions were very sudden indeed. So much, that i thought that there was something wrong with the film reel and it jumped a scene or something.Ok, the three transitions that are quite jarring are
1) When it transitions from Odin talking with Thor & Loki as children to Thor's coronation.
2)When Odin is speaking at the coronation and then it jumps to Odin's vault and the Frost Giant attempt to get the Casket of Ancient Winters back.
3)When it transitions from Thor, Jane and Darcy talking to the scene where we get all the bumpkins trying to lift mjolnir and basically having what looks like a tailgate party at the crash site.
On subsequent viewings, these aren't as jarring since you know they're coming but really these are such an easy fix that I'm still scratching my head as to why they weren't.
Yeah, it's all a big conspiracy. Different opinions are a myth.
Haha!Earle, I keep involuntarily reading your posts with Sinestro's voice.

Well we all know how accommodating you are of other's opinions. So I guess you'd agre that when Rex Reed wrote "Batman Begins is for morons", it was an informed opinion.

Why is BB for morons?
Ask the moron who said that.t:
True that.It's not, that was Rex Reed's header of his review of the film. I'm merely pointing out the fact that writers often try to be *******s when reviewing films merely for attention.
Also true.There are bad reviews of every film, including acadamy award winning films. Just read some of the bad reviews of the King's Speech. Some reviewers go out of their way to be contrarian just to get attention. I'm not saying they're all that way, but there's definitely a contingent.
So what he's saying is that Thor is good because of Brannah's past? That's a very objective opinion of him.Mark Kermode reviews Thor:
[YT]6NLDKH3mFAU[/YT]
I know it's sometimes hard to figure out just what his ultimate conclusion is but...I think he liked it.
