The Rebooted "Keep Hope Alive" (that the rights can revert back to Marvel) Thread - - - Part 12

Status
Not open for further replies.
You have a theory and I have mine. I think your theory is heavily flawed. You probably think the same of mine.

I'll just add this, Disney doesn't need any currently licensed Marvel property. I don't think they want to pay a dime for a property they don't currently need or have plans for. Put it this way, Disney is going to be the number 1 studio in NA BO gross this year. They will have released only 8 movies compared to everybody else in double digits, and number 2, WB, will have released 18 movies by the end of the year.

They don't need to purchase any of the licenses currently out. And, if they wanted to purchase or cut a deal for FF, they would have done so already, like they did with Ironman, Thor, Cap, Avengers, and Indiana Jones.


I'm not sure if they're opposing theories, just differing opinions on how likely a new Fox FF film is. I think it's less than 5%, and I presume you believe it's higher.

But let me pose this simple question for you: If you were a manager at Fox and you had little to no intention of making a new FF film, what would you do? Just let the rights lapse or pay a small fee to try to get $50 plus million from Marvel?

I would, without question, do the latter, so that makes me believe payment of the fee is meaningless because Fox would have paid it regardless of their intentions.

I believe the current situation is Fox would like to get something in the ballpark of $100 million from Marvel (or similar value in X-Men concessions). Marvel is likely willimg to give far less (and may not have offered a single penny just as you suggest).

So both sides wait. As time passes, Fox will have to lower their expectations and/or increase efforts to make it look like they'll make a film. I think something will happen in the next year or two.
 
They're basically making Hulk movies now; they're just telling the stories in other people's movies. Feige even stated the next 3 movies he shows up in are essentially a Hulk trilogy. They can just keep using that as a workout and tell Universal to go blow.

Yeah but that essentially means no She-Hulk or Red Hulk subplot.
 
Do Universal have distribution rights over a solo She-Hulk movie? Or how about a "solo" Red Hulk movie? If they don't, then couldn't Marvel just make solo Hulk films where the title is about someone else but it's essentially his movie? A Red Hulk movie could be that, where Banner has to stop General Ross. It's like if they had an Abomination movie, but it's really a Hulk movie where he has to stop Abomination.

That would be similar to the James Bond films. Goldfinger isn't simply a Goldfinger movie, as is Dr No or Spectre. They're just named after the villains, but it still has Bond as the main character.
 
I assume Universal would sue if they attempted something like that and win the case. If not, what is the point of the contract at all? At that point, what does the contract actually prevent?
 
Do Universal have distribution rights over a solo She-Hulk movie? Or how about a "solo" Red Hulk movie? If they don't, then couldn't Marvel just make solo Hulk films where the title is about someone else but it's essentially his movie? A Red Hulk movie could be that, where Banner has to stop General Ross. It's like if they had an Abomination movie, but it's really a Hulk movie where he has to stop Abomination.

That would be similar to the James Bond films. Goldfinger isn't simply a Goldfinger movie, as is Dr No or Spectre. They're just named after the villains, but it still has Bond as the main character.

I would imagine anything related to the Hulk is included under his contract. So She Hulk, Red Hulk, etc, would be part of the same Hulk 'bundle', just as his villains are. As such Uni would still claim distribution rights if Marvel made a film with any related Hulk hero/villain as the title character.

Your Bond example isn't apt in this respect as those titles named after the villains are still part of the James Bond package (though Spectre & Blofeld was a point of contention for quite a while due to rights claims over Thunderball, and both were kept out of the ongoing film's until that was resolved).

Avengers, Thor etc, is the proven way to get around Universal's distribution claim.
 
I take it that Universal has some type of perpetual distribution rights deal with Marvel. Its been almost 10 years since TIH. Whenever Marvel starts talking about doing a Hulk film then that means Universal is finally out of the loop.
 
I think you're dead wrong about the FF. I think Marvel wants them back so bad they can taste it, but if Marvel has proven one thing, it's that they're a shrewd businessman. They're gonna get what they want their way. It's only a matter of time before Fox realizes they just don't know what to do with the property, and they let it go. Marvel is just gonna sit on their hands until they can get them back their way.
I think they want them back to but both studios playing a game of chicken. One would have to believe Fox is serious about making another film. Which is why every now and then there are rumors of a Doom or Fantastikids film. And can any of that constitute as a rights extension. I doubt it. Disney obviously has lawyers who looks this legality over.

They will not pay a dime if they know Fox is bluffing and will wait this baby out. They have plans for the next 5 to 10 years without the FF. They are still wrecking the box office with characters they currently have.
 
I take it that Universal has some type of perpetual distribution rights deal with Marvel. Its been almost 10 years since TIH. Whenever Marvel starts talking about doing a Hulk film then that means Universal is finally out of the loop.

Its either 1) Indefinite/perpetual.
2) Holds for a limited number of films (possibly a trilogy or something), and there's no time limit on it. The Incredible Hulk was one, and they might have distribution dibs on a set number of follow ups if marvel did make them.
or 3) the deal is time sensitive and possibly nearing its expiration.

Anyone's guess as to which it might be.
 
Its either 1) Indefinite/perpetual.
2) Holds for a limited number of films (possibly a trilogy or something), and there's no time limit on it. The Incredible Hulk was one, and they might have distribution dibs on a set number of follow ups if marvel did make them.
or 3) the deal is time sensitive and possibly nearing its expiration.

Anyone's guess as to which it might be.

I am starting to think its 1 or 2. Which may very well mean a Hulk solo won't see the light of day for a long time as long as Hulk can appear in ensemble/buddy films.

Before Disney swooped in Marvel probably thought this was the best deal since they needed distribution. Paramount got a certain number of films so I assume so did Universal.
 
I really feel like Marvel need to work with Universal on getting Hulk squared away, particularly since the Universal Monsters films keep failing after The Wolfman, Dracula Untold and The Mummy all bombed. Universal are sitting on a goldmine if they'd just work with Marvel and pay them to produce Hulk 2 and spin-offs for She-Hulk, Red Hulk and Totally Awesome Hulk. Marvel would have total creative control over Hulk which that lack with their partnership with Sony. Marvel would even have more control over Hulk than they do with the Netflix series. Universal need to stop being difficult and understand that Universal Monsters is a sinking ship but Hulk might actually turn a profit.

Marvel/Disney have absolutely no reason to work with Universal outside of eventually getting the full rights back. A Sony like deal is not happening with Fox or Universal. The one and only reason Marvel/Disney did that deal with Sony, IMO, is because of merchandise. Disney gave up a lot to get the remaining 25% Spider-Man merchandise Sony owned in 2011. They then did the 2015 deal to maybe removing Sony's claws from the rights, and get a foot into regaining all the rights from Spidey they didn't already own, and to make sure he's relevant and helping sell merchandise.

They have no reason to overpay or give up as much as they did to Sony for Spidey. Spider-Man is the only Marvel character who gets merchandise and. Avengers follow a bit behind Spidey, with other high branded individual characters/teams (Ironman, Cap, Guardians) and then the rest (Thor, Hulk, Punisher, Deadpool, etc). Everyone else gets scraps, if they get them. They are not sharing revenue from their work for scraps. They already control all the merch rights. They already can do Hulk story arcs (and presumably other Hulks as well). They have no reason to offer Fox or Universal a Sony like deal.

I think you're dead wrong about the FF. I think Marvel wants them back so bad they can taste it, but if Marvel has proven one thing, it's that they're a shrewd businessman. They're gonna get what they want their way. It's only a matter of time before Fox realizes they just don't know what to do with the property, and they let it go. Marvel is just gonna sit on their hands until they can get them back their way.

Marvel executives most likely want them. I'm sure Feige would love to have SS or Doom. Even the X-Men. But it's not up to him, it's up to Disney executives, and they don't really need them at this point, so there's no reason to pay for it.

But let me pose this simple question for you: If you were a manager at Fox and you had little to no intention of making a new FF film, what would you do? Just let the rights lapse or pay a small fee to try to get $50 plus million from Marvel?

I believe you mean executive at Fox? If so, and ignoring other variables I would have in my hands, I would try to make a deal before the extension fee was due after the movie was obviously going to bomb. So from August 2015 until July 2016, I would be trying to negotiate and reach a deal. Failing that, when July 2016 came I would come to a decision, do I pay the extension fee and create a movie based on this property with lots of potential, or do I let it expire and watch Marvel create gold like they did with DD, Elektra, and Punisher?

Assuming other variables are okay, I would go with the former. I would not pay the extension fee and expect Marvel to come a knocking. It's not a "small fee" either, I would guess 2-3MM.

Its either 1) Indefinite/perpetual.
2) Holds for a limited number of films (possibly a trilogy or something), and there's no time limit on it. The Incredible Hulk was one, and they might have distribution dibs on a set number of follow ups if marvel did make them.
or 3) the deal is time sensitive and possibly nearing its expiration.

Anyone's guess as to which it might be.

I'm guessing number 2 because, IIRC, that's similar to what Paramount had when Disney bought it from them.
 
I believe you mean executive at Fox? If so, and ignoring other variables I would have in my hands, I would try to make a deal before the extension fee was due after the movie was obviously going to bomb. So from August 2015 until July 2016, I would be trying to negotiate and reach a deal. Failing that, when July 2016 came I would come to a decision, do I pay the extension fee and create a movie based on this property with lots of potential, or do I let it expire and watch Marvel create gold like they did with DD, Elektra, and Punisher?

So if Marvel had been dealing with you (or anyone they thought foolish enough that they might simply not pay the fee in July), they would have been crazy to offer you anything prior to July 2016. If you didn't pay to extend the rights in July, they would have gotten them for nothing.

So there's a Catch 22 in your thinking. You believe any serious negotiation would have happened prior to July 2016, but Marvel would have had zero motivation to negotiate prior to July 2016.

But in the real world, Fox paying that fee was a foregone conclusion. The rights are worth so much more than the fee, that both sides knew, regardless of Fox's intentions, they would pay the fee and it was a complete non-factor.
 
Last edited:
It's a Hail Mary, at best. I have my doubts that it goes through. But man, that'd bring Fantastic Four AND X-Men back into the Marvel fold.

Phases 4-6 would basically write itself.
 
It would certainly be something Disney would be interested in if the price was right. It would give them a load of marvel rights back, the rights to the original Star Wars as well the rest of the 20th Century Fox films including the Avatar films.
 
If it all goes through... The MCU is whole For All intents and purposes. Spidey, mutants and the first family all on screen together as they should have been.
 
Damn, I really hope this happens for the fans, particularly Willie!
 
I'll believe it when I see it. If it goes through, good news for FF fans, probably bad news for X-Men fans.
 
Keeping my fingers crossed. Ironically, if this happens, the primary reason that the value of the Fox film division dropped to the point Disney could make an offer can likely be traced to the big stock drop in August 2015 that Fox has never been able to fully recover from.:woot:
 
As exciting as that is, remember that Fox has a deal with Constantine Films for FF, they don’t own it right out like X-Men/Deadpool.
 
I'll believe it when I see it. If it goes through, good news for FF fans, probably bad news for X-Men fans.

I'm more hopeful about it in terms of the Fantastic 4. Never really wanted the X-Men in the MCU but hey, if it happens I'll be there opening night
 
What? Did not saw that coming!! Hopefully is true!!!
 
I'll believe it when I see it. If it goes through, good news for FF fans, probably bad news for X-Men fans.

I'm a massive X-Men fan, this isn't bad news to me. Possibly you mean Fox-Men fans?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,392
Messages
22,096,731
Members
45,894
Latest member
DooskiPack
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"