The screentime of venom

Discussion in 'Spider-Man 1, 2 & 3' started by Takeshi Sendo, Mar 7, 2008.

  1. Takeshi Sendo Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well i did a little job catching all the moments of venom in the film and paste them with a logic.
    If you want you can see my video,is spanish the lenguage and i guess that was very good the screen time,having in count that the two fights with snadman only have 2 minutes and the transformation no more than three and venom in the film have a total of 10 minutes.

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=lz9zPXAtnhw
     
  2. Venom 1988 formerly Ultimate_Venom

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2004
    Messages:
    8,002
    Likes Received:
    944
    Its actually 7 minutes. Screentime is the amount of time you actually see the character on the screen, not the whole scene hes involved in.
     
  3. TLH Hypnotized

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    4,428
    Likes Received:
    0
    Pft. Just another reason to be disappointed with this movie.
     
  4. JaD Thriller Night

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2007
    Messages:
    21,141
    Likes Received:
    2
    sandman shouldve been the main villain for this, his battle scenes were amazing, s3 didnt give him justice or venom, or tobey's dancing skills
     
  5. Stevens25 Guest

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2004
    Messages:
    888
    Likes Received:
    1
    7 minutes out of,how much? 139 minutes? Jeez. What a waste of an awesome character.
     
  6. sumspiderman Registered

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2007
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    0
    well I made a video of all sandman's fighting screentime and venom's fighting screen time, and sandman was only longer by maybe like 15 seconds if that. and his screentime in the whole movie is only a few minutes more then venom if you also count eddie, since alot of flint's scenes were just him also. so it's not that bad
     
  7. TLH Hypnotized

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    4,428
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yet another reason to be disappointed in this movie.
     
  8. sumspiderman Registered

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2007
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    0


    well what I was trying to get at was they didn't treat venom worse than sandman like everyone thinks, sandman may have had 3 fights, but they're all short, and venom's one big fight as just as long as those together.
     
  9. Blader5489 CASUAL SEX!

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,861
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's hard to take you or your criticisms seriously when you're anticipating the Dragonball movie. :whatever:
     
  10. Darkknight2099 Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2007
    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    0
    Exactly :whatever: .

    Anyway, I can't wait to see the Venom movie. Marvel has control this time, need more information leaked!

    DK2099
     
  11. RonStoppablefan Harry Potter fan

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,430
    Likes Received:
    0
    But I still don't understand what they could do with Venom in his movie, I mean he's Spider-Man's foe. Well any who I feel they should have nixed the Sand-Man and had Venom be the main villain for the movie. They could have done Venom justice and had a good finale battle between Spidey and Venom in the end instead of the way Venom was orginal defeated. Well any who I enjoyed the movie any ways dispite all that.
     
  12. sumspiderman Registered

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2007
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    0
    well I think they need sandman just because they needed someone other than harry to fight when he has the symbiote, but I think they should have killed him there in the subway. than have the last fight just be a big venom fight.
     
  13. RonStoppablefan Harry Potter fan

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,430
    Likes Received:
    0
    They could have just had Harry and Venom as the villains in the movie. But Sand-Man was cool, I loved the team up between Venom and Sand-Man.
     
  14. sumspiderman Registered

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2007
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    0


    wow, first time I've ever heard anyone say that. I guess I wasn't a huge fan of that, but it really wasn't a big deal to me. now if sandman was actually sandman in this fight and not the....whatever he was, then I would like it more.
     
  15. Arcturus Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2002
    Messages:
    12,480
    Likes Received:
    0
    I am just going to say that I was pleased with this incarnation of Venom, I do however think a little bit more screen time of Eddie Brock/Venom would've been nice. I know there was stuff cut out, it's the same deal with Sandman as well. Perhaps when Spider-Man 3.1 comes out, it'll fix that.
     
  16. Stevens25 Guest

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2004
    Messages:
    888
    Likes Received:
    1
    I know they cut some scenes because of cost,but they also could've left a few more minutes of footage in. I mentioned this before,but Pirates 3 was some 20 minutes longer than Spidey 3,and I'd watch a 3 hour Spidey movie if I could(I sat through Titanic and Grindhouse which were about 3 hours?).
     
  17. TLH Hypnotized

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    4,428
    Likes Received:
    0
    You keep telling yourself that. Looking forward to a particular movie doesn't hinder my ability to see the blatant and innate flaws of Spider-Man 3.

    Your words might have some meaning had, say, the Dragonball movie sucked and I thought it was great. But alas that is not the case so your claims are groundless. And for the record, I'm not exactly thrilled with the progress of the Dragonball movie. I still plan to see it.
     
  18. jrd550 He who is him

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,035
    Likes Received:
    0
    Really what a waste of a movie and plotline for 7 minutes.
     
  19. Takeshi Sendo Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    0
    well guys but venom himself is the max status of personality of eddie brock,i want to say that in the film we can see how eddie brock evolution until become his maximun expression,venom.If you want you can count part of the screentime of eddie brock.
    But its true that venom venom is only 7 minutes...like i said if we look the screentime of the sandman´s battles his two battles (without count the king kong sandman) dont have 2 minutes and his transformation only have 3 minutes.I want to say with all this post that the screentime of venom could be worse,mch worse.
     
  20. omid17 Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    11,102
    Likes Received:
    0
    LMAO good one Blader
     
  21. Trevor Goodchild Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2003
    Messages:
    960
    Likes Received:
    0
    Right, because yours is the only true taste in movies. :whatever:
     
  22. ironwez20 Registered

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Messages:
    4,771
    Likes Received:
    661
    venom should have been a cliffhanger and never should have been killed off i hope in 2030 they make a ramake like with batman and give venom a rightful position as the best villian in the spidey series
     
  23. Catman Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    Messages:
    29,046
    Likes Received:
    1
    :csad:
     
  24. The Joker The Clown Prince of Crime

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2003
    Messages:
    51,157
    Likes Received:
    3,124
    Where did he say that?

    He says he's disappointed with Spider-Man 3, and he gets insulted by Blader for it. Now you're putting words in his mouth and rolling your eyes because he's defending himself against such petty insults.

    Ignore the pair of them, Thinner. It seems to bruise their egos or something to see someone else criticize a movie they like. Especially Blader when it comes to SM-3. If you think the movie was a disappointment or flawed, then that's your right to say so.
     
  25. Blader5489 CASUAL SEX!

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,861
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, what I'm saying is that liking Dragonball--anime or movie--compromises your taste in what's good and what's bad. For analogy's sake, if someone said that Transformers was a great film but then said that Gone Baby Gone sucked, then obviously that person has bad taste. It's the same situation here. It's one thing to criticize SM3, it's another to criticize it but then think something like Dragonball is good (which is obvious given your avatar and tag).

    Unless you like DBZ as a guilty pleasure or something.

    Give me a break. :whatever: I thought you were a little more mature than that.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"