Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.
Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
Is that issue out yet?cmill216 said:Do we have another Venom confirmation on our hands, or is Wizard pulling its usual stunts?
POWdER-man said:Now that there appears to be a growing amount of threads created by Noobs in this corner of SHH, we have to take steps on curbing this growing problem. The majority of these threads are subjects long discussed, old reported news, rumours/heresay, and than of course the completely ridiculous ones that either make no sense or are not even linked to Spider-Man 3.
One way we could handle these problems is creating an official thread for main characters and subjects.
ie. The Official Topher Grace/Venom Rumours Discussion Thread
The Official James Franco Discussion Thread
The second way is to help these individuals and guiding them to the right thread.
We could use one of these two standard pictures when the thead is unneccesary or if it should be moved:
Now I am not talking about NEW news, I am more talking about the "Do you think Topher is Venom?", or "IMBd says Dr Connors is Lizard" threads that get created daily. Once we have specific threads for these subjects it should cut down on the constant posting of repetitive threads.
The third thing would be for everyone to stop posting in a thread that should be moved or closed after someone has posted one of the pictures and have given "helpful" instructions. This way either the thread will slide down the page or a Mod will choose to close it.
i just fixed your error see you wrote imbd so i changed it to imdb instead i hope you did't mind.POWdER-man said:Added these two to the FAQ:
It's Venom, it's a goblin, it's a church, it's..........nothing, absolutely nothing...
We have all heard and seen the eyepiece in detail. There is simply nothing conclusive to indicate that there is actually anything visibly clear in the eyepiece. It's mostly speculation, and/or "wishful" thinking on the most part by fans. If Sony MEANT to have anything in the eyepiece would you think they would make it so difficult to distinguish? Threads on the subject is therefore unneccesary and unwarranted around these parts.
But I saw something on IMdb (or Wikipedia)?(Thanks cmill)
Do not believe everything you read. Both websites depend solely on information provided by the fans. Sometimes they can be right but a lot of the times they are incorrect because fans are typically basing their information on rumours, speculation, or simply on what pops in their head. It's not to say the information on either site is 100% false, it's that the information provided is unreliable on best circumstances. Threads that are based on this information are not suggested.
LarryLegend said:
Jasmine said:
)
