Thor Ragnarok Spoilers - Part 2

They mention about the wormhole collapsing on itself in the Avengers. So I guess the Tessaract needs more set up and stuff. And maybe Hela knows the rainbow bridge is still the easiest and safest way to reach other realms. Didn't Heimdall say in Thor 1 that if the bridge is directed at some realm for too long that realm will perish?
 
So maybe that's why she wants the Bifrost more than the cube. See, it all makes sense. :)
 
Ha good point. But I'm sure Hela could wreck **** with the Tesseract too. But why bring out the big guns so fast?
 
It was interesting to see how the Eternal Flame was the thing that really got her attention.
"But this... the Eternal Flame. Want to see what true power really looks like?"
 
There's no reason for Hela to go for the Tesseract during the film. It's just a short matter of time before she finds the sword, and remember that while a lot happens on Sakaar time flows much more slowly there so Hela isn't on Asgard that long.

It makes no sense for her to neither panic and throw herself right after Plan B, nor to start invading other planets when she hasn't even gotten Asgard in order yet.

Ergo I'd go so far as to say that it would be weird if Hela used the Tesseract to go somewhere else in the timespan of the film.
 
Last edited:
Yeh and even though Hela is insanely powerful she isn't stupid. And it makes sense for her to establish her domain first, gather her troops, take full control of Asgard and then expand her domain from there onward. She could have started wrecking shop on Earth when she appeared but then again her attention was elsewhere.
 
Some good points. The other thought is - she didn't need the Bifrost sword out there in the hands of rebels - out of her control. Get that back first. Get your house in order.
 
Some good points. The other thought is - she didn't need the Bifrost sword out there in the hands of rebels - out of her control. Get that back first. Get your house in order.
Exactly.

And she was just waiting for Heimdall and the sword to be found. Since they couldn't find both then they threaten to kill the civilians which is a natural step in terms of the villain getting what she wanted. Then of course the civilians are not thinking about the bigger picture but about the short term future of their family and friends and they come out saying where the others are hiding.

Hela finds the spot where they where hiding and it's just when she is about to track them down that Thor gathers her attention by sitting on her throne and provoking her with Gungnir.
 
Apparently Hela needed the Bifost to travel across the Multiverse. But then how was she able to get to Midgard and Norway? :D
 
I thought it was poor not to explain that, even slightly).
I just made up in my mind she'd be released where Odin died.
 
And in "Thor" both Odin and Loki use Gungnir (Odin's spear) to open the Bifrost. Odin does that while banishing Thor to earth and Loki uses it to destroy Jotunheim. Hela was wielding Gungnir in Ragnarok and didn't use it. One may say that she didn't know that she would have been able to open the Bifrost with it but I can't imagine that she wouldn't be aware of that fact.
 
Last edited:
Apparently Hela needed the Bifost to travel across the Multiverse. But then how was she able to get to Midgard and Norway? :D

Odin's life force was keeping her imprisoned. When he passed she was released and he was on Midgard.
 
And in "Thor" both Odin and Loki use Gungnir (Odin's spear) to open the Bifrost. Odin does that while banishing Thor to earth and Loki uses it to destroy Jotunheim. Hela was wielding Gungnir in Ragnarok and didn't use it. One may say that she didn't know that she would have been able to open the Bifrost with it but I can't imagine that she wouldn't be aware of that fact.

That's a good point about Gungnir if true that she had it in her possession. Which scene was that? I remember Thor wielding it against her but don't remember her having it. I need to watch the film again. If she did have it in her possession perhaps there were enchantments she couldn't break?
 
That's a good point about Gungnir if true that she had it in her possession. Which scene was that? I remember Thor wielding it against her but don't remember her having it. I need to watch the film again. If she did have it in her possession perhaps there were enchantments she couldn't break?

Saw the film for the second time a couple of days ago. In the scene where she talks with Skurge about him beeing her executioner, Hela sits on the throne and Gungnir lies directly next to her. So perhaps there were indeed some enchantments and therefore she couldn't use it.
 
That's a good point about Gungnir if true that she had it in her possession. Which scene was that? I remember Thor wielding it against her but don't remember her having it. I need to watch the film again. If she did have it in her possession perhaps there were enchantments she couldn't break?
It's Hela's sexiest scene in the hole movie. Imo
When Hela is sitting on the throne, Gungnir is right in the middle of it... Hela is leaning to the right side with her hips right next to the spear. :drl:

Sexy as hell pose. And one can easily miss everything else happening in that particular scene. :woot:
 
It's Hela's sexiest scene in the hole movie. Imo
When Hela is sitting on the throne, Gungnir is right in the middle of it... Hela is leaning to the right side with her hips right next to the spear. :drl:

Sexy as hell pose. And one can easily miss everything else happening in that particular scene. :woot:

Haha that's probably why I didn't notice Gungnir.
 
It was interesting to see how the Eternal Flame was the thing that really got her attention.
"But this... the Eternal Flame. Want to see what true power really looks like?"

Man I was REALLY hoping to see The Destroyer again when she went down into Odin's vault.
 
So she was imprisoned on Midgard?

It could be that she was, and Odin went to that place at the end of his life, but it's probably simpler to assume that the way out was linked to Odin and would be where he was.

We can probably choose what explanation we like for ourselves as magic isn't really meant to be fully explained, or else it will lose the feel of just that... magic.
 
It was interesting to see how the Eternal Flame was the thing that really got her attention.
"But this... the Eternal Flame. Want to see what true power really looks like?"

Is the true power line a call back to Loki from the Avengers as well? If it was intentional, this movie just works on so many different levels, its amazing. :)
 
Mjölnir;35947509 said:
It could be that she was, and Odin went to that place at the end of his life, but it's probably simpler to assume that the way out was linked to Odin and would be where he was.

We can probably choose what explanation we like for ourselves as magic isn't really meant to be fully explained, or else it will lose the feel of just that... magic.

Yes that was my thinking as well.
 
Question: Does anyone know when exactly The Dark World is meant to take place in the MCU timeline? There were no continuity flubs here as big as the ones in Homecoming, but something at the beginning bothered me.

When Thor gets to the Bifrost, he doesn't recognize Skurge, and is confused that someone else is doing Heimdall's job. He has to have it explained to him that Heimdall was brought up on charges after the events of The Dark World and disappeared.

If that's the case...who was manning the Bifrost at the end of Age of Ultron, when Thor gets beamed up from Avengers HQ?

It was clear that TDW happened in 2013 because it was after The Avengers and two years after the events in Thor. Jane was stupidly pissed at Thor for not visiting her during the Chitauri invasion. She complained that it had been two years since she last saw him (in 2011).

The nonsense in TDW wrapped up quickly and Thor spent the time between that and AOU on Earth, with Jane and helping the team hunt for the scepter. Loki didn't banish Heimdall during that time, apparently. He probably waited until Thor left on his quest before ousting Heimdall and maybe Sif.
 
One of the things that felt really fresh and new about TR was the ending.
The heroes having to choose the lesser of 2 evils. They couldn't defeat Hela so either they would all die trying and then have a ton of asguardian casualties, with them also being enslaved/killed after that... And not to talk about what Hela's plans where to the rest of the Nine Realms and the Universe. She was just going to keep going and cause a lot of bad stuff.

Or they could unleash Surtur and make him fulfill his destiny by destroying Asgard and the source of Hela's power. This would create a conflict between Hela and Surtur which would lead to them fighting each other and one defeating the other. Since Ragnarok couldn't be averted, Surtur prime was the right choice and the one that could really stop Hela... Hela's defeat came at a cost. The destruction of Asgard.

It was epic to see Hela going at Surtur and trying to stop the inevitable. That final battle between the 2 villains was something new to the MCU, something i don't remember seeing before...
 
Very insightful interview.

Taika Waititi: 'I don’t have to be a tortured artist to be interesting, I can just be a f**king weird New Zealander'
On Thor: Ragnarok and the art of preserving one's voice while on the blockbuster playground

Thor: Ragnarok’s director Taika Waititi - New Zealander of the Year, blossoming fashion icon, and man of a thousand poses - is swift to launch into a description of Loki, the unbeloved son of Asgard, as, “someone who tries so hard to embody this idea of the tortured artist, this tortured, gothy orphan.”

He’s discussing the character’s emotional arc in the film, one that sees him put away his childish fixations and step up to save his city from obliteration; to put into perspective his petty family squabbles and realise a home is still a home, however you may feel about its inhabitants. Waititi’s Ragnarok may be childishly gleeful, but there’s still a hell of a lot of growing up to do.

The lesson to be learnt, Waititi explains, is simply that all this artifice requires too much effort. “It’s too tiring trying to be like that,” he says. “And, most humans, we get over ourselves, we get to that point where we’re like, ‘man, being a tortured artist is actually, like, a lot of work.'"

"'Maybe I should just be real and present, and just be me, and I don’t have to be a tortured artist to be interesting, I can just be a *****ing weird New Zealander and that’s enough.'"

It feels like a telling moment. A small, unconscious giveaway that immediately captures him as an artist. Effortlessly, Waititi’s description has managed to slip from Loki to himself. For, even in the world of gods and superheroes, he still finds common ground: to empathise, to see himself reflected to some degree.

Humanity has always anchored his work, in the sense that people, no matter their circumstances, are still bound by the same fears and insecurities – whether foster child (2016’s Hunt for the Wilderpeople), vampire (2014’s What We Do in the Shadows), or mass of biceps (Thor, obviously). “My world is not spectacle and explosion,” he notes. “It’s two people talking.”

In real terms (and this is a little damning, pending on your attachment to those characters), “Thor and Loki are just two rich kids from outer space and we shouldn’t really give a ***** about what their problems are.” But in Waititi’s hands: a little bit of a shift here, a little bit of a tease there, and new layers emerge.

Ragnarok is a story, in a way, of letting go: Loki of his façade, Thor of his fixation on his own image as the impenetrable hero, and toward a real sense of leadership. Waititi adds, “You realise that there’s nothing more endearing than people who are desperately trying to be liked or trying to be the hero, you know? Who also probably just need a hug or want to impress their dad?”

The days are long gone, certainly, from when Marvel hired Kenneth Branagh to turn Thor into Shakespearean epic. But filmmaking, as much as life, is a journey. Evolve or die, in other words. While Star Wars is still in its first tender steps for Disney, Marvel’s maturity has seen the necessity to experiment to prevent itself from drying out. There’s a lot to be said for the fact the Han Solo film’s Phil Lord and Christopher Miller can be fired for leaning on improvisation, while Waititi can be hired for it.

“I just had to remind myself that they asked me to do this for a reason,” he muses. “Because of a certain sensibility that I have that they’re interested in. I just did my own thing, let them steer me in the Marvel direction as long as I could keep my Taika-kind-of-voice going through the whole thing. And they were very supportive of that.”

The director, curiously, is not actually credited as a writer on the film, though he explains: “I was contracted to do a couple of passes on the script, for dialogue and stuff like that and, you know, I didn’t mind not being credited there. A lot of these things are determined almost before you start, because there were also two versions of the script before I turned up as a director.” Best put, Thor: Ragnarok is a Marvel movie recalled in a “Taika-kind-of-voice”.

An MCU base upon which Waititi’s usual trademark touches balance. For example, in the way he’ll undercut an emotional crescendo with a swift joke (take Hunt for the Wilderpeople’s funeral scene, ironically the funniest part of the film).

And so, one of the most essentially tragic moments of the entire franchise, the destruction of Asgard, the home to a whole people, destroyed in front of their eyes, occurs only for Korg (Waititi in a motion-capture suit), forever trying to be helpful, to chime in that “the damage is not too bad” since the foundations are strong enough to rebuild upon. That is, until the foundations blow up, too.

That “Taika-kind-of-voice” is evident also in Ragnarok’s visuals. Though Waititi initially cites a more traditional source, Thor’s original co-creator Jack Kirby, he names Alejandro Jodorowsky’s work, too, namely The Holy Mountain and his aborted Dune adaptation, making use of Chris Foss’ concept art for the latter.

“Sometimes we didn’t capture it, but it was definitely on the mood boards a lot,” he notes. “Just that style. Just some of the sets and some of the colours.” Asgard and Hela took inspiration from Gustav Klimt, in all their sparkling elegance.

Subversion and re-examination is at the heart of so much of Waititi’s work, from the superficially comic – What We Do in the Shadows’ vampires in a flatshare – to the more layered, as in the constant questioning of masculine ideals at work within Boy (2010)’s central father/son relationship. With Ragnarok, there’s some subtle, quietly illuminating work at hand in its female characters.

Of course, much has been made of Cate Blanchett’s Hela marking the MCU’s first female (main) villain. However, what makes her work so well as a character isn’t just the fabulous, delicious badassery of a Blanchett unleashed, as promised in the film’s marketing material. As Thor’s sister, the exiled child of Odin, her wrath is, in fact, perfectly justified.

Amongst Ragnarok’s hijinks, Asgard’s troubled history is revealed, that Odin manipulated Hela’s bloodlust when it suited his conquering ambitions, and discarded her when he wanted to play benevolent ruler. “Where did you think all this gold came from?” Hela so tellingly questions.

As Waititi explains, “I loved the idea that Asgard was built on the spoils of all these wars, and they just sucked all the resources out of these worlds that they conquered and took them back to Asgard, which is very relevant right now. And we see it time and time again.” Indeed, why would Asgard, a kingdom with its monarch, somehow be magically absolved of the evils of imperialism?

“Also, the fact he was so proud of his daughter and gave her this hammer, which is so awesome for Thor to find out that it’s not even his hammer, the hammer’s a hand-me down,” Waititi continues. “It’s almost like a Lucifer complex. You know, just like Lucifer would say: ‘Why did you make me, then, if you knew this was what was going to become of me?’ I can totally empathise. Even though I know what she’s doing is wrong as a villain, I’m totally like, ‘Yeah, girl. You get it.’”

When it comes to Tessa Thompson’s Valkyrie, the Asgard warrior who exiled herself after defeat at the hands of Hela, the film jumps into archetype: the Han Solo, the hard drinker, the rogue. The thing is, it’s an archetype almost never applied to female characters. Her introduction sees her both single handedly take out an entire gang of scrappers and drunkenly topple off a gangplank.

It was enough of a change that Waititi admits he was nervous as to how she’d be received by audiences. “My fear sometimes is that people’s reactions are, ‘Oh god, a drunk woman? What’s wrong with her?” he says. “But, if it was a guy, you know, everybody would be like, 'Ah, awesome, what a cool dude! He loves day drinking!' Which is so dumb.”

“At some point, I remember, we got one comment in one test screening that was, like, ‘Oh, she’s really violent. That was, like, really full on for her to murder those people.’ But, you know, Han Solo straight up murders a dude and everyone thinks he’s cool,” he adds. “So, I just really wanted that character to have the most layers and, in a way, she is one of the most interesting characters in the film.”

All of Ragnarok’s achievements, however, seem to come down to Waititi asking himself a few simple questions: “What’s the least expected direction we can go in? And most of the time we were shooting, that’s the one thing we kept reminding ourselves of. Do we feel like we’ve seen this before in another Marvel film? Or do we feel like we’ve done this before? If so, what’s the opposite direction we can run in, and instead of running, let’s sprint in that direction.”
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/taika-waititi-interview-thor-ragnarok-hunt-for-the-wilderpeople-valkyrie-han-solo-imperialism-a8048106.html
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,288
Messages
22,080,019
Members
45,880
Latest member
Heartbeat
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"