I find it really really really hard to sympathise with those who believe sandy should go through.
I've read three about four pages of this thread earlie and i don't know how much clearer i can be.
Nothing brought up changes the fact sandy is still going to go out and do whatever is necessary to help his daughter, He doesn't want to hurt people BUT he will.
He was sorry, is sorry now and will be sorry in the future, but nothing is going to change his actions.
He's an addict and saving his daughter is his drug.
Yeah I put actions before words everyday of the week, people have to deem themselves worthy of trust, it's earned. The same way you don't pass on all your security details to someone you've just recently met.
Sandman has no worthy actions and his predicament hasn't changed since his first turn to crime. If anything he's gained abilities to further commit crimes.
IT comes down to a split where some are vouching him based on his actions and others based on his words
not only this but some like myself say he should also be held accountable for his past actions (post sandbox but including breaking out of jail).
All this stuff about it being his choice, why can't anyone else have a say considering it affects them.
Let the police choose to let him go free
Let society choose to raise funds for his daughter instead of him stealing
Let spiderman choose to not see him as a menace
Let the prison choose to let him free
Let his daughter/mother choose if they want him to get them money
Let his other victims choose whether he should be forgiven or not
since when did sandman become the boss of everyone else's emotions & decision making
People saying his victims should 'just forgive him' is just as wrong as me saying he should 'go to jail and hand himself in'. We are ultimately making their choices for them from other people's point of views...At least mine is allowing people to express those point of views by allowing them to charge or not charge him if they see fit.
Ultimately it's a meaningless discussion because nothing is resolved except peter is able to let go. Sandman, his daughter, the city, the police are all left in limbo purely because parker couldn't be arsed.
Now do you feel that parker as guardian of the city behaved responsibly or selfishly through that conversation. Note, this is a man whose whole lifestlye is based on wielding his great power responsibly and acting on the best interest of (the majority/all) the people of new york?
choice is all good and dandy, look at al gore, it's his choice to ***** about global warming but it's also his choice to have a $30,000 electricity bill. It doesn't however mean he has acted responsibly based on his campaign/life ethos. Thats exactly the same as judging a man by his actions rather than his words.
That's why i feel actions speak louder than words and why handing one's self in is the ultimate action from sandman.
meh