Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]460361[/split]
See I think what Warner is doing is smart, After the success of The Dark Knight trilogy, they reintroduced Superman back, now rather than do a reboot of Batman, right away we just into a World's Finest team-up story. I think afterwards instead of Flash it should've been a Wonder Woman, followed by a trinity movie with (Bats, Sups and Wondy) then do a Justice League. But perhaps if they can get Flash right and appealing to the audience it could generate enough support to do other characters like Aquaman, Martian Manhunter, Green Arrow etc...
I agree with this....there is no need to redo Batman's origin...look at how many people complained about Amazing Spider-man retreading the same material that Spiderman covered.
Yep, the last thing we need is another Batman origin story. Bruce Wayne's parents were killed and he's Batman we know! lolI agree with this....there is no need to redo Batman's origin...look at how many people complained about Amazing Spider-man retreading the same material that Spiderman covered.
You talk about him as if he isn't Kryptonian raised by humans.C'mon... You aren't thinking about Henry's age a little? Don't you want him to be in prime breeding condition for as long as possible?
Yep, the last thing we need is another Batman origin story. Bruce Wayne's parents were killed and he's Batman we know! lol
Earlier today something suddenly hit me: If we had a Wonder Woman trilogy (that runs ties in with the JL movies, natch), at what point would Donna and/or Cassie come into the picture?
Earlier today something suddenly hit me: If we had a Wonder Woman trilogy (that runs ties in with the JL movies, natch), at what point would Donna and/or Cassie come into the picture?
ЯɘvlveR;26416783 said:has flash and jl been confirmed? and hasn't some wb producer let it known that they want a wondy film for 2016?
My parents are DEAD!!!!!!
Well, so much for Nicholas Refn as a possible director of a WW movie. His latest just got trashed as "one of the five worst movies ever made." I'd be surprised if WB/DC would touch him with a ten-foot pole after reviews like this one--
http://observer.com/2013/07/unforgivable-only-god-forgives-is-one-of-the-worst-movies-ever-made/
Well, so much for Nicholas Refn as a possible director of a WW movie. His latest just got trashed as "one of the five worst movies ever made." I'd be surprised if WB/DC would touch him with a ten-foot pole after reviews like this one--
http://observer.com/2013/07/unforgivable-only-god-forgives-is-one-of-the-worst-movies-ever-made/
I loved the movie. I saw it last night. Refn is too risky. Too violent. Too sexually explicit. Too artistic to do a superhero movie that's monitored by the studio. His films like OGF don't make much money. They get mixed reviews because he's an experimental filmmaker. It's trashed because people in North America aren't used to these kind of movies. They think Drive was weird, but that doesn't even scratch the surface.Well, so much for Nicholas Refn as a possible director of a WW movie. His latest just got trashed as "one of the five worst movies ever made." I'd be surprised if WB/DC would touch him with a ten-foot pole after reviews like this one--
http://observer.com/2013/07/unforgivable-only-god-forgives-is-one-of-the-worst-movies-ever-made/
It's awful if it's not your cup of tea. If you're looking for something accessible or mainly about a story. Refn is a visual filmmaker. He's a lot like David Lynch. The story gets tossed out a lot of times because he's exercising his visual fetishes. For me it's a visual masterpiece. I love films like that. But Refn isn't the guy for WW even if I would freak out over the announcement. It's just not going to happen.Only God Forgives was pretty awful. I'm all for making the audience think and making them come to their own conclusions, but not to the point where the audience has to basically make up their own story.
I loved the movie. I saw it last night. Refn is too risky. Too violent. Too sexually explicit. Too artistic to do a superhero movie that's monitored by the studio. His films like OGF don't make much money. They get mixed reviews because he's an experimental filmmaker. It's trashed because people in North America aren't used to these kind of movies. They think Drive was weird, but that doesn't even scratch the surface.
It's awful if it's not your cup of tea. If you're looking for something accessible or mainly about a story. Refn is a visual filmmaker. He's a lot like David Lynch. The story gets tossed out a lot of times because he's exercising his visual fetishes. For me it's a visual masterpiece. I love films like that. But Refn isn't the guy for WW even if I would freak out over the announcement. It's just not going to happen.
People were also expecting Drive because of Gosling, but it has a lot more in common with his Valhalla Rising.
Is Refn on peoples list because of RISING? I own DRIVE on BLU RAY and really like it (I'm not crazy about it or Gosling the way some are). At no point watching it did I get the sense "This is the guy for WW." I have not seen RISING so maybe I don't have the right point of reference.