Wonder Woman Thread Reborn! - Part 5

Status
Not open for further replies.
So beautiful...

Julia Voth
Age: 27 (in 2012, 5-16-85)
Height: 5' 8"
Measurements: 34-24-34

juliavoth.jpg
 
Because blunt is awesome. If anything, you should be happy people are accepting Blunt. Way too often people suggest ''model slash actress'' type choices for WW.
 
^ blunt has black hair and she is good actress

perfect WW

fan boy logic

even tho she look as much as an amazon warrior as RDJ look like conan the barbarian

not to mention she is like 5'6

she turned down 2 comic heroine roles already
 
Blunt is far from average in the looks department. :huh:

I've seen people saying that they think that Emily is ugly, he commended her, saying it she is a good actress, but that in his opinion is not really pretty, I think Emily beautiful, but opinion is something quite peculiar.
tumblr_krxwc5FQwI1qa4vyso1_500.jpg

Observer-Film-2009-emily-blunt-7631393-341-512.jpg


Emily without much makeup or produced:
AirtportLAX_02.jpg
AirtportLAX_04.jpg
 
Last edited:
I think Blunt would've been perfect as Black Widow instead of Scarlett Johansson. She looks much more like Natasha Romanoff and would've brought a different feel to both Iron Man 2 and the Avengers. Scarlett is too much like a milk maid.
 
^ blunt has black hair and she is good actress

perfect WW

fan boy logic

even tho she look as much as an amazon warrior as RDJ look like conan the barbarian

not to mention she is like 5'6

she turned down 2 comic heroine roles already

Emily is a great actress, she could give life to this character, both in the category emotional, as in the physical, well this is my opinion, her body would have to be worked, well as in the case of men.

Yes, she has turned down roles in Iron Man 2 and Captain America (The first, due to incompatibility in its agenda). But she would like to have interpreted the Black Widow, then we can conclude that she would accept to play a character from the comic book.

*She is 5 '7 ½ ", I know this is not a big difference, but my mother always said "one centimeter can change everything"...
 
Last edited:
I think Blunt would've been perfect as Black Widow instead of Scarlett Johansson. She looks much more like Natasha Romanoff and would've brought a different feel to both Iron Man 2 and the Avengers. Scarlett is too much like a milk maid.

I agree somehow, but I liked of Scarlett Johansson, if I could choose, would be Emily, but unfortunately it was not possible.
 
^ blunt has black hair and she is good actress

perfect WW

fan boy logic

even tho she look as much as an amazon warrior as RDJ look like conan the barbarian

not to mention she is like 5'6

she turned down 2 comic heroine roles already
oh.my.god......:dry:
 
I never said Blunt was average in the looks dept in general.

I said she's average in the looks dept for Diana. There are tons of other actresses that resemble the character more, she's decent in that regard (facially, proportions etc).

My opinion on Blunt is she's okay for the role, but there's way better. I think they're better off going with a lesser known given the likelihood that WW's only chance for a film screen appearance is in an ensemble Justice League film.
 
more images of Lynn Collins from John carter She looks Good
johncarterexclusivephot.jpg
johncarterexclusivephot.jpg
 
Lynn Collins. Haven't seen a film with her, but she looks just right. And she's not overly sexual either. Good thing.
But who will give the character most depth? Who's the best actress of the suggested ones? Not Alexandra Daddario, not Jaimie Alexander... but Emily Blunt.
Wonder Woman isn't only about beauty.

I just hope that the project gets a director who doesn't just want to make WW as a shallow rock video party, but actually explore the character and her story.
 
Last edited:
just because you a great actor doesn't make you better for the role

brad pitt is a better actor than hemsworth but i dont think he would of made a better thor
brad_pitt_troy.jpg
Thor+Chris+Hemsworth-535x356.jpg
 
Last edited:
Who ever said Brad Pitt was a contender for Thor?
 
I never said Blunt was average in the looks dept in general.

I said she's average in the looks dept for Diana. There are tons of other actresses that resemble the character more, she's decent in that regard (facially, proportions etc).

My opinion on Blunt is she's okay for the role, but there's way better. I think they're better off going with a lesser known given the likelihood that WW's only chance for a film screen appearance is in an ensemble Justice League film.

Yes, I even said that you praised the Emily, saying that it she is a good actress. I think not there is an ugly person, just that the person's, may not be the style of beauty, that a person likes.


Lynn Collins. Haven't seen a film with her, but she looks just right. And she's not overly sexual either. Good thing.
But who will give the character most depth? Who's the best actress of the suggested ones? Not Alexandra Daddario, not Jaimie Alexander... but Emily Blunt.
Wonder Woman isn't only about beauty.

I just hope that the project gets a director who doesn't just want to make WW as a shallow rock video party, but actually explore the character and her story.

I agree 100%.Talent is more to me, than beauty, the WW need an actress who can give depth to her, she deserves a great actress to play her.


more images of Lynn Collins from John carter She looks Good
johncarterexclusivephot.jpg
johncarterexclusivephot.jpg
Lynn is beautiful.

just because you a great actor doesn't make you better for the role

brad pitt is a better actor than hemsworth but i dont think he would of made a better thor
brad_pitt_troy.jpg
Thor+Chris+Hemsworth-535x356.jpg

I believe that the Brad, would do an excellent job. He looks beautiful in the movie Troy.
 
Last edited:
^ Some soda with lemon twist, why do you ask? :p

That's it I'm putting my support back into Bridget Regan. :o
 
That's only for a few movies. In Tim Burton's Batman film he fought muggers in the beginning of the movie. In Men in Black both leading characters were doing good too. Their actions proved to the audience they were the good guys.

A few movies? Spider-Man, X-Men, Matrix, Avatar, Star Wars, Aliens, District 9, Thor, Captain America, Iron Man, The Hulk, Superman, Lord of the Rings, Fantastic Four, Green Lantern, Kick-Ass, Unbreakable, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles... almost every movie I've ever seen. The main character never starts out working for the greater good, because the story is abouthow they come to work for the greater good. We care about them because they are like us, and then they become something more. That's how movies work, brother. Audience do not like the main character because they work for the greater good. They have to like them before that.

This is to say nothing about movies like Inception, Kill Bill, Scott Pilgrim, Road to Perdition, in which the main character NEVER is working towards the greater good, but personal fulfillment. Notice how the audience still likes those characters, even though they

Then it's not the audience that is at risk of not buying into but the filmmakers inability to sell it.

Sell it to who? The aformentioned jaded audience? That's semantics, my friend. It's a hard sell, regardless of if you put the blame on the vendor or the consumer. This idea that 'they'll like them because they're good guys' just doesn't pan out in reality.

Who says Ares is going to be the villain in a movie?

Remove Ares, insert villain of the movie.
 

Well, if this image was for me, I did not drink anything.
When I praised Brad, was because I really thought he was gorgeous in the movie, I know the image below it, is the Hemsworth.

^ Some soda with lemon twist, why do you ask? :p

That's it I'm putting my support back into Bridget Regan. :o

Bridget Regan is beautiful and super friendly.
 
Lynn Collins looks great. I demand a manip! :argh:

Please. :(
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,455
Messages
22,111,371
Members
45,905
Latest member
onyxcat
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"