No.You guys think Zack might be boo'd on stage tomorrow?
One guy in a sea of 6500? Nah. It would take a small army of people devoted enough to camp out 9 hours in line just to boo someone. Highly unlikely, imo.Hope you are right. It only takes one guy.
One guy in a sea of 6500? Nah. It would take a small army of people devoted enough to camp out 9 hours in line just to boo someone. Highly unlikely, imo.
Hope you are right. It only takes one guy.
That would be a sorry thing to do.
Before and since the film's release, I have seen a lot of ideas thrown out for "what they should have done", including my own, and nothing has made me say "That would have been so much better!" Yeah, there were some things they could have changed. But, the fact of the matter is, with a character as powerful as Superman, in the context of these other characters they need to include, it is HARD to tell a big screen story that makes fans and non fan movie goers happy. If I were a writer or filmmaker, I think I would have a much, much easier time with the Avengers characters, or the X-Men or a Batman solo. It's one thing to do a Superman story in the comics, people are much less forgiving in live action on the big screen, balancing the internal logic of the story, "Why didn't Superman just...", the action, the characters, the drama, a viable physical and mental threat, an emotional arc. I loved the Donner movies as a kid, but logic is basically thrown out the window, there's a completely different audience these days, and people wouldn't buy that anymore. CBM expectations are completely different now
People who act like the movie is so stupid, and their idea would be so much better, I would bet that 99.99% of the time, their idea would not have worked as a blockbuster film that audiences and critics would embrace. There's a reason people say that Superman is a boring character, or he's too powerful. Just to have a believable confrontation between Batman and Superman, you have to use Kryptonite, a crazy armored suit, and Superman is holding back big time.
Snyder and Co. were not trying to disrespect these characters, there was a lot of thought put into the film. People should at least acknowledge and respect that they took on a much more difficult task than most Comic Book Movies, and not just act like "Snyder sucks, booo Snyder, fire him." Snyder is a pretty damn outstanding director in terms of visuals in the Comic Book genre.
I actually think if Snyder and Terrio were given free reign over the X-Men universe, they could make a film that blows the Singer/Jackmanverse out of the water. Imagine an X-Men movie that is as visually faithful to the comics and the comic book aesthetic as BvS, that takes on much more serious, grounded, mature themes (I'm not saying the X films aren't mature or good, but I do feel like they don't live up to the potential of the comics)
People say you would have to pull the FT trigger to ignite and cause the explosion but I am not an expert in using flame throwers.
But the way Zack Snyder described it, he wasn't willing to have Batman shoot him between his eyes. So I don't know if he intended to have Batman kill or "disable" in a way that your attack results in your own death.
People say you would have to pull the FT trigger to ignite and cause the explosion but I am not an expert in using flame throwers.
But the way Zack Snyder described it, he wasn't willing to have Batman shoot him between his eyes. So I don't know if he intended to have Batman kill or "disable" in a way that your attack results in your own death.
When they show Steppenwolf, it looks like he has his arms out, holding a mother box in each hand, and then there's another mother box that looks like it's being held up by "something" around his waist level lol
You guys think Zack might be boo'd on stage tomorrow?
Without the protection of their computer screen?
Please...
In the interview,
“...There’s a scene from the graphic novel where he busts through a wall, takes the guy’s machine gun… I took that little vignette from a scene in The Dark Knight Returns, and at the end of that, he shoots the guy right between the eyes with the machine gun. One shot. Of course, I went to the gas tank, and all of the guys I work with were like, ‘You’ve gotta shoot him in the head’ because they’re all comic book dorks, and I was like, ‘I’m not gonna be the guy that does that!’”
He says for certain that HE (Snyder) did not kill KGB.
He also says:
“So, I tried to do it by proxy. Shoot the car they’re in, the car blows up or the grenade would go off in the guy’s hand, or when he shoots the tank and the guy pretty much lights the tank [himself]. I perceive it as him not killing directly, but if the bad guy’s are associated with a thing that happens to blow up, he would say that that’s not really my problem.
This shows that Snyder's thinking is that Batman is dramatically stopping the bad guys. In his heart and mind (such as it is) his is not setting out to murder the bad guys...but he doesn't loose sleep if they die or are critically injured by their combined interactions actions...or does he?