Yeah... I prefer just "The Amazing Spiderman 2"! If the sequel is called "The Spectacular Spiderman", than it all of the sudden seems like a reboot of the reboot. I don't think it works. Keep it simple.
Exactly. We gotta remember that the general public gets confused as hell about these things.
Sequel titles ey? How about reboot titles when MOS flops?![]()
Sequel titles ey? How about reboot titles when MOS flops?![]()
Flop as in GL flop?
![]()
I definitely don't see MoS making as much, or less, than GL. No chance.
why not just plain old "Superman" (not to be confused with "Superman: The Movie")? just keep these movie titles simple. you dont need some ridiculous movie title
you can't be serious? Hell no to Man of Stel II! ugh...be creative, not ****ing lazy
A sequel happens if the movie is successful,a sequel is definitely happening in 2015, im almost tempted to say regardless of box office (as long as word of mouth is good) my reasoning:
1. recent screaning and wb execs apparent enthusiasm
2. the proximity to wb then scrapping jl scipt
3. no longer rumors of snyder making a star wars universe movie
a sequel is definitely happening in 2015, im almost tempted to say regardless of box office (as long as word of mouth is good) my reasoning:
1. recent screaning and wb execs apparent enthusiasm
2. the proximity to wb then scrapping jl scipt
3. no longer rumors of snyder making a star wars universe movie