mclay18
Avenger
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2005
- Messages
- 17,382
- Reaction score
- 5,607
- Points
- 103
Of course they're saying that.
Yeah. But you know, some studios go back on their word. Remember that little incident where the founder of Netflix was going to halve its DVD rental and video streaming service into two separate companies? That didn't happen.
Yeah. I wouldn't be surprised if Peter Jackson says, "We hit a snag in post-production and we want to make The Hobbit as good as we possibly can", so that would give WB an incentive to push it back.
That said, I'm always a little wary about pushing a release date up (especially so dramatically). I mean, it's not like the finished product was gonna sit on a shelf for those 6 months - the filmmakers were counting on having that time to complete their film. Since this movie started filming SO damn early with a December date originally in mind, I won't be too worried about it (if it happens), but I'd certainly hate to see this to turn into a rush job.
How are they rushing it? Showtime said that they're editing scenes as they shoot and sending them to the visual effects companies to begin work. It's very efficient and WB won't have to pay through the nose to finish it. From the way production is going, it seems like MOS will be completed by the end of next year at any rate.
Besides, WB has done the "complete a blockbuster and sit on it" thing with Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince. It was completed before its original November 21, 2008 date for the push back to July 15, 2009. Paramount did the same thing with the Star Trek reboot, and both films did very well.
So, if The Hobbit won't be the film pushed back, then perhaps the WB movie being pushed back is The Great Gatsby. It won't require the extensive post-production schedules like MOS or The Hobbit, but WB can swap that with MOS if they want.
But if their competition has to be pushed back (World War Z, Les Miserables), WB can sked MOS in those dates. Nothing wrong with that.
Last edited: