I'd like Brainiac in the sequel, voiced by either hugo weaving or benedict cumberbatch.
I think Lex should be there also, either leo or damon would be my wish.
Hugo Weaving and Brainiac in the same sentence is something that fills me with delight. Too bad it will never happen knowing what he has said about certain "meaningless" roles.![]()
I'm just trying to not overhype the movie for myself. I liked Sucker Punch for goodness sake I'd be shocked if I didn't at least like this film.But there are so MANY likable components. Even if it turns out to JUST be a popcorn flick, it'd be a highly effective one.![]()
Mark my words, GL was hated by the general public. Reyolds is never playing GL again and that movie has already been forgotten. Only wayward fans of that film think that Reynolds is going to show up in a JL film.Also, while I could end up being totally wrong with how MOS ends up being received by everyone, there seems to be real high quality presented within the world shown in MOS.
I personally wouldn't want to really risk tainting it by connecting it to other DC Hero films that could end up being much lesser in quality.
Which is why I wonder at times on why anyone would want to have Ryan Reynolds back as GL for a JLA film since that would mean that we'd have to accept the events of GL as being canon and connected with the likes of MOS and any other DC hero who was able to pull off presenting a great world of their own. Its like tainting it really.
Honestly, if they were to present him with a great script and characterization for the given role, I think he'd do it. I mean the guy ended up doing the Matrix and Agent Smith is in a lot of ways like Brainiac.
Oh no...we're back on Batman.![]()
should they go for president luthor?
it would be fresh new dynamic superman taking on the most powerful human on earth
Didn't he say that he doesnt like doing superhero movies because of his experience with playing the Red Skull?

Except that is exactly what The Avengers is. It is sequel to IM/IM2, TFA and Thor. That is the entire beauty of it.That's kind of an contradiction isn't it? If that was the case, then "The Avengers" would be considered as "Iron Man 3" as opposed to the current "Iron Man 3" that we have now being labeled as "Iron Man 4".
Why should superman's character have to share his film with other heroes for his sequel? Saying that he can't have a successful sequel is like implying that he can't hold a film on his own then. And honestly, while the scale of the action is an important factor, you don't want to lose the heart of the story and truth be told, if MOS didn't look like it had any heart within it, then I doubt some of us would care as much about it as we do now.
I wholeheartedly agree
![]()
"It was good to do it and try it out, but to be honest, its not the sort of film I seek out and really am excited by. As an actor, to do all sorts of different films is great. It stretches you in different ways. But, I increasingly like to go back to what I used to always do, which is to get involved with projects that I really have a personal affiliation with."
I'd want an unknown for Braniac. That would make him seem "out of this world."![]()
Except that is exactly what The Avengers is. It is sequel to IM/IM2, TFA and Thor. That is the entire beauty of it.
The Iron Man numbers game has everything to do with the release of IM2 and the early attempt to capitalize. But there is a reason they are going with subtitles for every other film.
It isn't the Iron Man franchise, or the Thor franchise. It is the all encompassing Avengers franchise.
If they coerce Leo to portray a "nolanized" luthor for the new generation. That would be something.
I'm personally hoping for Snyder to get Hamm on board.
The one thing I'm looking forward to from JLA as opposed to the avengers is that **** gov't aspect. I can't stand the way it works over there.

I'd say that for any Superhero. Heck I am the guy that doesn't think some heroes should show up outside of being a secondary character in a bigger film.Why are you just saying that with Superman though? Have you ever said that about any other hero? Why didn't they just stop at Batman Begins? Of course making a sequel isn't easy but that still doesn't mean that I don't want them to try if MOS is a good flick.
I agree, people's rose colored glasses for the dated effects in Superman: The Movie is why some find CGI in a Superman film so jarring.
If they coerce Leo to portray a "nolanized" luthor for the new generation. That would be something.
I'm personally hoping for Snyder to get Hamm on board.
The one thing I'm looking forward to from JLA as opposed to the avengers is that damn gov't aspect. I can't stand the way it works over there.
I like all of them. They all have a weak film. In BTTF case, two weak films.1. The Lord of the Rings
2. The Dark Knight Trilogy
3. Jason Bourne Trilogy
4. Back to the Future
etc.
Of course, I wouldn't call them perfect trilogies but they've done better than most ones.
Hey, Superman the movie had that cool fault repairing scene with the lava. And had the hula-hoop phantom zone, and some obvious green screen work, and an obvious miniature with the dam-repair scene. And didn't have any big fights or punching from Superman.
Okay, so it is more dated then I'd want to admit![]()
Why exactly?Which is why MOS needs to be as stand alone as it can for the time being.