BvS All Things Superman and Batman: An Open Discussion - - - Part 93

Status
Not open for further replies.
Batman-vs-Superman-Ben-Affleck-Costume.jpg
 
Ah, the old "grounded"=automatically serious argument. Gotta love the hype.
Gotta love pretentious sarcasm.

He said GROUNDED, BADASS, and he's described his character as an ANTIHERO.

Those words scream serious movie to me. To the people that are expecting a Jeff Smith style childrens story, i think you will be disappointed. I think they will be going for a Harry Potter esque tone here, or the tone of the Geoff Johns Shazam stuff. It's not completely dead serious, but Shazam's enemies are.

Billy's environment, Sivana, and Black Adam can be serious and intimidating threats without the movie being overly serious. Billy/Shazam will obviously be cracking jokes, but the world around him will be somewhat grounded and serious. There will surely be levity, but this isn't going to be a straight up kids movie.
 
Think about it, this Shazam movie is going to be connected to BvS, it's not going to be a children's comedy.
 
You know, even if it's like that, I don't think I'll mind it so much now...But thought he would be good for comic relief.
 
I wonder how much of the film is going to be split between Metropolis and Gotham.
 
Kinda hoping for a 50/50, especially with the pics of Bruce in Metropolis and Clark in Gotham.
 
You know, even if it's like that, I don't think I'll mind it so much now...But thought he would be good for comic relief.
I still think Shazam will be used for comic relief, but he will be a comedic character in a serious environment, with serious enemies. Billy Batson's early story is a little bit depressing, he's an orphan that lives on the streets in some interpretations. Everyone seems to think all of the Shazam lore is completely lighthearted. It is sometimes, but not always. A more serious approach wouldn't be going against the spirit of the character. I actually think that's a respectful way to go, and a more mature interpretation gets me more excited than a straight kids movie. THERE WILL BE JOKES. Shazam is a child in an adult's body. Of course there will be jokes. But i suspect Black Adam, the Wizard and Sivana (if used) will be played straight for the most part.


exactly what we assumed, but it's encouraging that they really seem to be moving forward with this.

It's a great time to be a DC fan. I really hope Sandman is as connected to the DCCU as much as the books were connected to the DCU.
This lineup is a ****ing amazing way to kick off the DC universe. This lineup is deeply mythological, supernatural and magical, I love it. It'll really set DC apart from Marvel.
 
Last edited:
I still think Shazam will be used for comic relief, but he will be a comedic character in a serious environment, with serious enemies. Billy Batson's early story is a little bit depressing, he's an orphan that lives on the streets in some interpretations. Everyone seems to think all of the Shazam lore is completely lighthearted. It is sometimes, but not always. A more serious approach wouldn't be going against the spirit of the character. I actually think that's a respectful way to go, and a more mature interpretation gets me more excited than a straight kids movie. THERE WILL BE JOKES. Shazam is a child in an adult's body. Of course there will be jokes. But i suspect Black Adam, the Wizard and Sivana (if used) will be played straight for the most part.

Fair. I don't completely believe the whole, "no jokes" thing.
 
i dont find nothing in the warner site is this true?
Those domains have been registered by WB but the sites only redirect to the official WB site. Thus, they're placeholders for now.
 
Fair. I don't completely believe the whole, "no jokes" thing.
Yeah I'm going with Seth Rogen on that one. If he felt compelled enough to say that it was bs then i trust him, he could easily verify something like that if he wanted to, with the connections he has.
 
Coming out with a Sandman movie this early in the game is such a genius business strategy. Sandman is seriously some of the best **** i've read, period. It has the potential to be such an original film series. and JGL will be perfect for Morpheus. we just need a great director on this, it'll be a tough job.
 
JGL could direct it.

JGL and Ben Affleck are inventing a new superhero category. The category where the director is the star of the film. Can't think of another director who was the lead of a CBM. Yea Jon was Happy but Happy isn't the lead.

Maybe Chris Evans could join them.
 
Coming out with a Sandman movie this early in the game is such a genius business strategy. Sandman is seriously some of the best **** i've read, period. It has the potential to be such an original film series. and JGL will be perfect for Morpheus. we just need a great director on this, it'll be a tough job.
I dunno, I have my doubts, but we'll see. I'm not writing him off completely.

I need to go back and read Sandman. It's been a VERY long time since I've read it. It's been about 15-16 years?
 

The domains have been registered for quite some time (using whois.com)

Aquamanmovie.com - Created on 2000-11-21 - Expires on 2014-11-21 - Updated on 2012-10-21

WonderWomanthemovie.com - Created on 1999-08-05 - Expires on 2016-08-05 - Updated on 2014-07-04

ShazamMovie.com - Created on 2000-11-21 - Expires on 2014-11-21 - Updated on 2012-10-20

JusticeLeaguefilm.com - Created on 2013-11-27 - Expires on 2016-11-27 - Updated on 2014-03-17

Sandmanmovie.com - Created on 2001-01-23 - Expires on 2015-01-23 - Updated on 2012-12-22

It is basically WB keeping the domain names ready as needed.
 
Sandman was created in 2001 but Justice League was created in 2013?

Wut?
 
I'm guessing they had registered JusticeLeaguemovie.com before that one
 
I'm one the verge of reading Sandman. The only Verigo series that I've read is 100 Bullets and it's brilliant. So I want another one.
 
Sandman was created in 2001 but Justice League was created in 2013?

Wut?

A Sandman movie was in development way way back. Here is an article about it from 1998: http://www.aintitcool.com/node/2571

It died in the development process from roughly 2000 onwards and only came back to life last year. OTOH, the Justice League registration was almost surely as part of the new plan.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"