Infinity9999x
Avenger
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2005
- Messages
- 12,107
- Reaction score
- 638
- Points
- 103
That article makes some solid points, but I think what it's missing is that the writers have still been handling the character horribly.
The concept of breaking a character down to build them back up is a fine one, but what the writers don't seem to understand is that "breaking down" does not equal "making this character even MORE unlikable."
I don't really blame the actress for most of the Laurel problem. A lot of it is just bad writing. There have been a few times where writers have added little details which just boggle my mind. For example, the detail where we find out Laurel knew Sarah liked Oliver first. Why? What was the point of that? Why did that detail need to be added, because it literally serves no other story purpose besides making Laurel even more unlikeable.
Or take the flashback sequence between Sarah and Laurel. When Sarah raises some, quite logical, questions about Oliver to Laurel, she instantly gets overly-defensive and overreacts to her sister's comments. In a situation where we should clearly feel sorry for Laurel, the writers have now actually made Laurel, once again, act unlikeable for no reason, and actually made us empathize slightly with Sarah. Once again, why? I have no idea why they're doing this, other than the fact that they're actively trying to make the audience dislike her.
A simple change of that scene, where you have Laurel just calmly reply "You know, I think Ollie's really changed. I think he might be the one," to Sarah's comments, instantly changes that mood. Now we feel sorry for Laurel, because she honestly believes Oliver is the guy for her.
They've been doing things like this all season, and it's not helping the character. And I really don't understand they're reasoning. Unless they really are planning on making her a villain as some have speculated. At this point, that honestly may be a better option.