TheCorpulent1
SHAZAM!
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2001
- Messages
- 154,474
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Even his She-Hulk was mostly good in its own way, after a bit of a rocky start (although it still doesn't hold a candle to Slott's).
YesHowever the thing is if we want No More Events we have to stop buying them. Marvel is event driven right now. The events are ruling the stories instead of the stories ruling the events. I am an old school X-Men fan from the 80's and the events that I remember and love were ones where the events naturally occurred from the story. Look at Dark Phoenix Saga. That was an event that wasnt an event. It was a natural progression of the story. Jean became Phoenix in issue 101 in 1976 and she died in issue 138 in 1980. Claremont have 4 years to cultivate this story and tell it. This is a commitment to the story that Marvel doesnt have right now.
I keep using Claremont's X-men as an example because to me this was the pinnacle of comic book storytelling. He had his run planned out for hundreds of issues and seeded them with story lines he could use in the future. Are any of the current writers planning out that far?
No.
They can't.
Because the new hot event might erase all the hard work of setting up their series. Marvel needs to get back to telling stories instead of selling comics.
I agree.I prefer to call his book boring. The first two years were great, the baby issue was amazing, the rest of the series has been mediocre or worse (mostly worse).
Jonathan Hickman has 60+ issues of Avengers planned.However the thing is if we want No More Events we have to stop buying them. Marvel is event driven right now. The events are ruling the stories instead of the stories ruling the events. I am an old school X-Men fan from the 80's and the events that I remember and love were ones where the events naturally occurred from the story. Look at Dark Phoenix Saga. That was an event that wasnt an event. It was a natural progression of the story. Jean became Phoenix in issue 101 in 1976 and she died in issue 138 in 1980. Claremont have 4 years to cultivate this story and tell it. This is a commitment to the story that Marvel doesnt have right now.
I keep using Claremont's X-men as an example because to me this was the pinnacle of comic book storytelling. He had his run planned out for hundreds of issues and seeded them with story lines he could use in the future. Are any of the current writers planning out that far?
No.
They can't.
Because the new hot event might erase all the hard work of setting up their series. Marvel needs to get back to telling stories instead of selling comics.
No way.Jeez a Greg Rucka Wonder Woman sounds so much better than a Grant Morrison one.![]()
The mutant race is back to their numbers pre-M-Day.Also, could someone possibly take a time out from the spiteful complaining to give me a rundown of what AvX changed in the Marvel U? I always knew it was going to suck, so I didn't buy any of it.![]()
I'm not a fan of Morrison. The only reason I'm interested in the book is because I've always had a slight interest in the character and Azzarello's Wonder Woman made me a fan. Also I really enjoy what Earth One is doing and am eager to see all its future projects. But I'm realy not excited to see a modernized version of the subliminal, fetish fantasy incarnation.No way.
Grant Morrison is going to write zany, sexual, political golden age WW.
While Rucka's WW is great, it's much more straight laced and, dare I say, mundane.
Jonathan Hickman has 60+ issues of Avengers planned.
And Geoff Johns had/has even more than that planned for Green Lantern.
Plus Peter David seems to plan pretty far out in X-Factor.
And Grant Morrison planned out 8 years of Batman stories.
And Brubaker had like 7 years of Cap stories planned out pretty resolutely.
And I'm sure there are more I'm not thinking of presently.
Johns was one of the mastermind's behind The New 52, so saying his run ignores it is just plain inaccurate.Johns, Morrison, and Brubaker had the advantage of being so big that they were allowed to sometimes ignore what other writers were doing. I mean, Morrison and Johns were allowed to completely ignore the New 52 reboot and continue with their comics as if nothing had happened.
You mean his editors actually tries to edit his book? Those bastards.Meanwhile, Chuck Dixon no longer works for DC because he refused to make last minute changes to several issues of Robin and Batman & the Outsiders that he'd already written a few months ahead of time.
And that was quite a shame.Remember Dwayne MacDuffie's run on JLA? He kept having characters and entire plot threads taken out of his hands during his run because his plans didn't mesh with events happening in other comics.
It could be, sure. But there are plenty of examples where it hasn't been too.If you don't have enough pull, your long term plans on any title could be sacrificed in favor of someone else's event.
Well he wanted to tell different kinds of stories from his previous volume since Winter Soldier is following those. I've liked his stuff with Codename Bravo and the Scourge arc. It's not as good as his old stuff but I still like it.Brubaker seems like he's been phoning in the last year's worth of Cap stories.
ok so let me get this straight. Cap forces Cyclops out of Utopia and puts him on the run when his plan was to use the pheonix in Hope to bring back all mutants. Cap and iron Man then create a machine that ends up giving Scott and 5 other the power of the pheonix and they are slowly corrupted by it and it makes Scott kill the Professor. In the end they beat scott and...use the pheonix to bring back all the mutants. So now the man who worked his ass off to save mutant kind is in jail for something iron man and cap are responible for, Wanda who killed many avenger members and caused M-Day in the first place is a good guy, Wolverine who has killed and murdered more people then I can count and still does is going to be leader of a avengers team and basically the leader of the x-men? What the **** marvel
Cyclops is not the "cool" character. That is all there is to it.