sabetoonth
Where You Get Those Eyes?
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2008
- Messages
- 15,552
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 58
MCU time I'm sure, like 99.99999999999999999%Real time or MCU time?
MCU time I'm sure, like 99.99999999999999999%Real time or MCU time?
I would love to see Skull back, but hasn't Weaving already said he's not interested in returning?
Yeah he did say something along those lines, kind of a one and done, feels like he did all he could, doesn't want to be limited or defined by the role. But he was a brilliant Red Skull. Getting Redford for TWS was a coup and who knows maybe things like that and the reception TWS is getting might change how Weaving feels.
Even if he doesn't come back The Red Skull could work as a re-cast seeing as he's donned/assumed many other personas or "faces" throughout the comics to keep his identity hidden. If Weaving really decides not to return, perhaps I could see someone like Willem Dafoe taking a crack at it. There were some times after he lost his "face" that I could easily have mistaken Weaving for Dafoe, possibly because he reminded me of Dafoe's Klause character in The Life Aquatic. If you're familiar with that film or know of which character I'm talking about you'll know what I mean lol.
That is never specified that I'm aware
Considering there were Christmas decorations, I'd sometime around late December and very likely the same year as The Avengers.Some months is very vague.
Actually they did:
-Kevin Feige said in an interview that IM 3 took place "some months" after Avengers.
-Craig Kyle said in an interview that TDW took place one year after Avengers.
-Scarlett Johansson said in an interview that TWS took place two years after Avengers.
There's the timeline.
Official timeline statements like that kinda annoy me. They want to keep the MCU going like Bond, but they keep referencing real time and state when each film takes place in. I wonder how that's going to make the MCU look in 10-15 years from now.
Official timeline statements like that kinda annoy me. They want to keep the MCU going like Bond, but they keep referencing real time and state when each film takes place in. I wonder how that's going to make the MCU look in 10-15 years from now.
Check out Mackie's hands in the second pic.
What I would do is watch the films based on real time.
I noticed that SLJ seemed to be smelling EVC's shoes in the second pic, and Sabastian Stan has a shocked expression while looking at him.
Is that possible?
Well according to the writer he doesn't really feel it was that inspired by Clancy although it was in that area, according to him. My guess is that they will be going for even more of a grander spy and military feel in the next movie than this one. Clancy stories were more about the overall political tale than conspiracy, I think, if that makes sense. I think IM3 was more of a Tom Clancy movie than this was.I don't see much difference either between typical Clancy fare and 70s spy thrillers so it wouldn't be all that noticeable.
It's explained in the movie itself. The government doesn't want SHIELD involved in the Mandarin hunt because they want to prove they can handle things without them and the Mandarin is not a SHIELD-type threat, he's a terrorist. The Extremist connection was also not known when Tony discovered it.Agents of SHIELD also confirms this in an in-universe way.
The pilot episode takes place after IM3. Episode 8 takes place after Thor2. And last week's episode was just prior to TWS.
The time in between is not that important but it does confirm that none of these films overlap like they did in Phase One and TWS is definitely not a prequel as some were suggesting.
It also means TWS doesn't really explain SHIELD's absence from the events of IM3 and Thor2 the way Feige said it would.