I'm also hoping he'll incoporate elements of "Venom" in here. Bruce failing in rescuing a child and him using drugs to boost his power.
Bane is a genius brute, the only way he would make sense is if he poses a serieus threat. Bane will break Batman, maybe not his back but atleast his spirit.
He can't do that after 15 minutes of film.
I'm sure they'll leave out Jean Paul etc. but the core idea must exist.
Nolan doesn't tend to do direct adaptions. I would expect this film to have elements of Knightfall.
A lot of the reason that Knightfall was so long was Batman's other villains, and the interwining stories of Azrael, Robin and Nightwing. Since these characters don't exist in Nolan's franchise as of right now, I don't see why it can't be adapted in a reasonable timeframe in one film, probably between two and a half to just under three hours.
I don't know if anyone's counted the number of minutes that the Joker was on screen, but I know he wasn't present nearly as often as a lot of people were expecting. When he was, though, he made a huge impression and turned out to be the biggest threat that any incarnation of Batman has ever seen on the big screen. Bane could easily be handled in the same way. He'll probably have a bit more screen time than the Joker did because mystery was part of the Joker's allure, but even Hannibal Lecter in the Silence of the Lambs only had a total of 16 minutes on screen.
Noooooooo dont milk this one movie out.Nolan would not do that by the way.I truly hope Nolan will do the Knightfall arc justice, but I sincerely doubt it could be done in one movie.
I think the Dark Knight Rises will be a two parter. (Just like the last Harry Potter film).