I did.You could say the same for Katie Holmes being in a movie with Christian Bale and Liam Neeson.
I did.You could say the same for Katie Holmes being in a movie with Christian Bale and Liam Neeson.
I do too but i don't want her in a Batman movie.
Someone needs to put that quote on T-Shirts. I love the attitude, I think some fans need to start thinking the same and stop worrying about whatever else may 'challenge' Batman 3. 2011 too crowded? Nah. Bring it on, Marvel, Sony, Fox, whoever they are, they are the ones who should be scared, would any of them seriously want their flicks going up against a third Nolan Batman film?
I'm not worried about BB3 not faring well against the competition. I know it'll steamroll anything it's up against, but I already have a few movies I want to see in 2011 so I'd rather save BB3 for 2012.
And you don't have time for one more? That's an odd reason not to want Batman 3 in 2011.
Im betting there will be tons of superhero movies in 2012 as well. And 13. And 14. And 15. Im also betting most of them will fail.
^ Still makes no sense.
I tend to agree, something tells me Thor is going to flop big time.
Yeah it does.
Personally I would rather have for example, 4 movies to watch/look forward to in the summer of 2010 and 4 movies to look forward to in 2011 than say 5 movies in 2010 and only 3 in 2011.
I would rather have Batman 3 come out in 2012 since there already seems to be a good lineup for the next two summers.
Ah, so? What difference does it make if one year has more movies than the other? Are you not going to see Batman if it comes out in 2011?
Anyone seen this yet, or am I seriously behind?
LOLt:
Oldman further weighs in on his comments:
http://movies.ign.com/dor/objects/961205/batman-3/videos/sdcc09cap_oldman_batman3_vdi_072409.html
(LMAO at Mila Kunis just nodding her head, praying to be in the third one)
# of summer films for any given year isn't really indicative of anything. This year was *supposed* to be great, with a large number of blockbuster movies. Difference is that most of them ended up sucking.
Hollywood won't ever run out of big-budget films to display in a year. What we should worry about is whether or not any of them will be good.
If there only were 3 films a year to see, you would have a good point. But its closer to 30 than 3, and we dont know how "big" 2012 will be or how many of the said films will be worth seeing.Yeah it does.
Personally I would rather have for example, 4 movies to watch/look forward to in the summer of 2010 and 4 movies to look forward to in 2011 than say 5 movies in 2010 and only 3 in 2011.
I would rather have Batman 3 come out in 2012 since there already seems to be a good lineup for the next two summers.
I tend to agree, something tells me Thor is going to flop big time.