The Dark Knight Rises Gary Oldman - "We start shooting next year. You didn't hear that from me"

I do too but i don't want her in a Batman movie.
 
Someone needs to put that quote on T-Shirts. I love the attitude, I think some fans need to start thinking the same and stop worrying about whatever else may 'challenge' Batman 3. 2011 too crowded? Nah. Bring it on, Marvel, Sony, Fox, whoever they are, they are the ones who should be scared, would any of them seriously want their flicks going up against a third Nolan Batman film?

I'm not worried about BB3 not faring well against the competition. I know it'll steamroll anything it's up against, but I already have a few movies I want to see in 2011 so I'd rather save BB3 for 2012.
 
I'm not worried about BB3 not faring well against the competition. I know it'll steamroll anything it's up against, but I already have a few movies I want to see in 2011 so I'd rather save BB3 for 2012.

And you don't have time for one more? That's an odd reason not to want Batman 3 in 2011.
 
And you don't have time for one more? That's an odd reason not to want Batman 3 in 2011.

It's not really a matter of time, it's more that I don't want to have almost every future superhero movie I'm looking forward to crammed into one summer. I'd happily save one of them for 2012 and it looks like that'll be Batman.
 
Im betting there will be tons of superhero movies in 2012 as well. And 13. And 14. And 15. Im also betting most of them will fail.
 
anyone here believe WB will announce something soon?
 
Im betting there will be tons of superhero movies in 2012 as well. And 13. And 14. And 15. Im also betting most of them will fail.

I tend to agree, something tells me Thor is going to flop big time.
 
^ Still makes no sense.

Yeah it does.

Personally I would rather have for example, 4 movies to watch/look forward to in the summer of 2010 and 4 movies to look forward to in 2011 than say 5 movies in 2010 and only 3 in 2011.

I would rather have Batman 3 come out in 2012 since there already seems to be a good lineup for the next two summers.

I tend to agree, something tells me Thor is going to flop big time.

If Thor is as epic as Kenneth Branagh has planned I think it will get asses in the seats. Can't truly tell until we see a trailer but I think at the very least it will do decent.
 
Yeah it does.

Personally I would rather have for example, 4 movies to watch/look forward to in the summer of 2010 and 4 movies to look forward to in 2011 than say 5 movies in 2010 and only 3 in 2011.

I would rather have Batman 3 come out in 2012 since there already seems to be a good lineup for the next two summers.

Ah, so? What difference does it make if one year has more movies than the other? Are you not going to see Batman if it comes out in 2011?
 
Ah, so? What difference does it make if one year has more movies than the other? Are you not going to see Batman if it comes out in 2011?

:facepalm

Your missing the point.

Wouldn't you want a decent and roughly even number of movies for two years in a row or would you rather have it like this year and last year where last year was full of good to great films while this summer there have only been a couple of films that were actually decent?

While 2011 already seems to have a solid lineup of films 2012 doesn't aside from Avengers and I think Captain America. Instead of jam packing the summer of 2011 I would rather have Batman or hell, any other summer film go to 2012 to give us some more entertaining films that year so we're not left with slim pickings.

Either way I would still watch a third Nolan Batman film if it were released in 2011...not sure why you thought having it come out a year earlier would deter me from watching it.
 
# of summer films for any given year isn't really indicative of anything. This year was *supposed* to be great, with a large number of blockbuster movies. Difference is that most of them ended up sucking.

Hollywood won't ever run out of big-budget films to display in a year. What we should worry about is whether or not any of them will be good.
 
# of summer films for any given year isn't really indicative of anything. This year was *supposed* to be great, with a large number of blockbuster movies. Difference is that most of them ended up sucking.

Hollywood won't ever run out of big-budget films to display in a year. What we should worry about is whether or not any of them will be good.

No the number of films in one summer doesn't indicate quality, I agree with you there.

I should have phrased it better and kept it as "films that your looking forward to" since you won't truly know if you'll like the films 'til after you've seen them.
 
Last edited:
I see. Well as I said, Hollywood churns out tons of these each year, and from my experience, there's always something that has piqued my interest.

Be it 3, to 5, to 8...I'm not really concerned with the amount so as long as something is waiting there for my ticket.
 
You guys started having a real discussion instead of just wildly speculating like the rest of us and you killed the thread.

:csad:
 
Yeah it does.

Personally I would rather have for example, 4 movies to watch/look forward to in the summer of 2010 and 4 movies to look forward to in 2011 than say 5 movies in 2010 and only 3 in 2011.

I would rather have Batman 3 come out in 2012 since there already seems to be a good lineup for the next two summers.
If there only were 3 films a year to see, you would have a good point. But its closer to 30 than 3, and we dont know how "big" 2012 will be or how many of the said films will be worth seeing.
 
I tend to agree, something tells me Thor is going to flop big time.


I think it depends on the advertising . There needs to be alot of hype and a stand out trailer.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"