Texas Zombie
Not Super
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2006
- Messages
- 3,242
- Reaction score
- 23
- Points
- 33
edit. double post
You had me until that.
The problem of including Catwoman is not only that's she's not enough of a threat, but she can't really blend in if another villain is present. This is why I prefer Talia al Ghul over Catwoman any day.
What you're saying is actually my point. She's not a part of the villain's plan to destroy Gotham, nor Batman's plan to save it. She's an unnecessary plot device.Wait....what?
That makes absolutely no sense. If anything, Catwoman can blend in easier when another villain is active. It leaves her free to steal while Bats is preoccupied with the Riddler (or whoever they choose to incorporate).
I've never thought Catwoman works as a straight villain to Batman. She's much better when she's used as more of a playful adversary, similar to how Loeb writes her. Catwoman wouldn't have a reason to "team up" with Riddler, because I honestly don't think she wants Batman dead. That would ruin her fun.
The only way I want Catwoman connected to the Riddler's storyline is in a situation like...Riddler hiring her to do a job, or Catwoman stealing something the Riddler wanted, thus making her a target, but no "team ups." I just don't think it works with her character. Despite all Burton did right with Catwoman in Returns, that was one thing I didn't.
there fore opening for a future of robin the nolanvese, zucco kills all but the child grayson ,very good idea, and the bm scene i described was just for an idea of how they push the envlope like the y did with joker, your ideas are damn good, and if croc has epidedrmic hyperkartosis, and what yougave him, hed alreasy be scary, and the toxin ould only make it worse, really good ideas as usual
What you're saying is actually my point. She's not a part of the villain's plan to destroy Gotham, nor Batman's plan to save it. She's an unnecessary plot device.
I only mean that she would be an unnecessary plot device in these films. She simply cannot work into the main storyline, nor can she be the main villain as she can't provide the same type of threat previous main villains have.Ahh, you were talking about her blending in thematically, I thought you meant it in a more literal sense story-telling wise.
However, I would disagree that she's an unnecessary plot device. Catwoman is a great foil for Batman, in that she essentially is a Batman with out (or with much less rigid) morals.
Bruce has always been a person who's attracted to adventure. Yes, he created Batman primarily to avenge his parents and protect people, but you can't deny that he's attracted to the glamor of adventure. Countless writers have reflected this (Miller in Y1, showing Bruce doing flips on his skies while on a "restful" ski trip, or the fact Zorro was the movie Bruce was watching before his parents died in the comics).
Catwoman represents the allure of simply letting yourself become lost in the excitement of being a vigilante. She lives only for the fun and excitement of being a masked persona, without the responsibility that Bruce carries. This could be very tempting to Bruce, because honestly, who doesn't just want to say "to heck with it all" and live for fun?
She could also be very usefull if they explore the dillema between "where does Bruce Wayne end and Batman begin?" Bruce has always struggled with maintining a balance between his costumed alter ego, his fake playboy Bruce Wayne, and his true self. If they explore the angle that he's becoming more and more obsessed with being Batman and rarely taking the time to be Bruce, Catwoman would be the perfect representation of the allure of the mask, that keeps pulling Bruce back towards going back into the suit, and also be a very real reason why he's always going out as Batman.
Besides that, she's a very interesting love interest. So I would say there are a variety of ways Catwoman would fit in thematically within the story of the next movie.
I only mean that she would be an unnecessary plot device in these films. She simply cannot work into the main storyline, nor can she be the main villain as she can't provide the same type of threat previous main villains have.
Your three scenarios rebuked:How would she be unnecessary? She could add to Bruce's character development, or the them of the movie, as I've said above. She could easily work into the main story if you have her do something like
*Get hired by Riddler to do a job, thus putting her in Batman's way
*Steal something Riddler wants, thus forcing Batman to protect her but also watch her so she doesn't steal anything else
*If Edward Nygma is portrayed as a high class Gotham Socialite, he could be vying with Bruce Wayne for Selina Kyle's affections, while at the same time, as Catwoman, Selina Kyle steals from Nygma..ect, ect.
She can fit in the main storyline quite easily. She's no more unnecessary that Talia or any other love interest would be.
Talia would be better because she can also function as a main villain. To introduce a new character this late in the game just to replace one of the main characters in the series is what avid TV fans would call a "jump-the-shark" moment.
Your three scenarios rebuked:
1. That's an unnecessary villain team up. The Riddler should play most of the game from behind the scenes, manipulating a dumber brute to do most of his dirty work if need be
2. That would not make Batman protect her.
3. Bruce probably won't be on the dating scene. A new love interest should more or less be someone that Bruce can't understand why he's attracted to her - torn between new affections and old grievances.
Talia would be better because she can also function as a main villain. To introduce a new character this late in the game just to replace one of the main characters in the series is what avid TV fans would call a "jump-the-shark" moment.
And besides, Talia had Bruce's kid.
Interesting, you just kind of put yourself downNo fan would ever interpret the introduction of Catwoman as a jump the shark moment. She's too popular and she can contribute to the plot in a way that Rachel couldn't.
1.How would it be unnecessary at all? The Riddler would view it as manipulating a dumb brute to do his dirty work if he hired Selina to steal something for him. Nygma views everyone besides himself (and maybe Batman) as a dumb brute. Selina would obviously be the best burglar in town, and Nygma would hire the best.
2. What do you mean it wouldn't make Batman protect her? Batman has done similar things in the past. If Batman sees someone trying to kill someone else, he helps out that person, even if he knows that person is a criminal. That's who Batman is.
3. I never said Bruce would be on the dating scene, I said he would be vying for her affection. What you said is exactly how I would want Bruce's relationship with Selina to unfold. An unexplainable, yet very potent, attraction, laced with guilt over already becoming attracted to another person so soon after Rachel's death.
Not only that, it would help his "cover" seeing as how Bruce routinely wines and dines women to keep up his playboy facade.
And...Talia having Bruce's baby in the comics adds absolutely nothing to the argument. That's like me saying "And Batman said "Quiet or Papa Spank"." Well yeah, he did say that in the comics, but that has absolutely no effect on the movie-verse whatsoever.
And while I think Talia would work, using her as a main villain would be somewhat repetitive. But, she's just as valid a choice as Selina, and I see no way that Selina is any more unnecessary than Talia. They both serve as love interests and foils to Bruce that highlight aspects of Bruce's character.
:facepalm
Ladies and Gentlemen, I fear that this next film will be a lot different than what we may all may think. I am not discounting the ideas many of you have spent countless minutes fabricating, but the reality is: expect something different....call it a hunch.
Interesting, you just kind of put yourself down![]()
But any character can be a "jump-the-shark" deal, especially if the character is poorly acted.
And all the fan choices for Catwoman so far are also horrible actresses (like Angelina Jolie)
I agree completely. But hey, if we didn't want to speculate, this forum wouldn't exist. Speculating is half the fun of the hype surrounding movies like these.
Speculation is fine, but recently it seems these ideas are now just repeating over and over. Not that these ideas are bad mind you, but the same arguements and similar plot lines, are starting to blur. It's getting hard to say "that's a great concept" or "very original" without someone saying "yeah but some other guy on here posted it and I was elaborating". Maybe it's just me and I'm just in this thread a little too much.
does a villain have to be evil, I mean, does a robber have to be evil to rob someone?