i didnt mean he should literally fight 600 people either, wat i meant was for him to fight alot of people at once just like tony jaa in that scene. u dont think 25 is a reasonable # cause that's about how many tony fought in that scene. i think it could work really well and it would get more people excited to actually see batman fight.
harley quinn could be interesting but the way heath ledger did the joker, i cant imagine him having a girlfriend.
I agree and disagree with what you are saying. Whilst the Joker does not love Harley as much as she loves him, I think there is some sort of twisted affection there. He is very possessive of her and lets her get away with alot more than anyone else.
I think that Paul Dini has also stated somewhere that "He loves her as much as he can".
In my opinion, I would describe the relationship between Harley, Joker and Batman as similar to that of a child , a playmate and a favourite toy.
If the playmate (Harley) isn't present, the child (Joker) will happily play with the favourite toy (Batman).
Likewise if the favourite toy isn't present, the child will happily play with the playmate.
However, if the playmate tries to play with the favourite toy or looks set to harm it, the child can get nasty towards the playmate.
Does that make sense.![]()
wtf?i dont really want to see the riddler that much, or if they do have him, i think it should just be as edward nygma and he isnt the riddler yet (unless they already did that in tdk, with the bank manager???).
Yea, simply because he is called Mr Reese. Mysteries! Get it!!![]()
Version 7
Bruce will struggle hard with the consequences of being Batman and will vow to give up
Slow down.
Before you talk about casting villains you need to first deduce what the third film will be about in broad terms.
For instance, BB was about fear. Bruce's struggle with his own fears, his conquering of those fears, and his utilization of those fears as a force for good. The scarecrow was much like Batman in that he was manipulating fear to serve his own goals, just like Batman learned to do during his training with Ra's. Ra's was the person responsible for enabling Bruce to overcome his fears by "becoming his worst fear."
TDK was about order, chaos, and chance. Batman representing order, the Joker chaos, and Two Face chance. The Joker operates with no rules (ie. no integrity) and seeks to force those with integrity (Batman and Dent) to go against their idealistic rules. Once those rules are broken and gone, there is a vacuum where chance becomes the dominate force. By the end of the film Dent is motivated purely by chance and Batman must stretch the limits of his integrity by saving the Joker from death and becoming the scapegoat for Dent's crimes. Like Alfred says, he's not being a hero he's being something more.
These things were already discussed, but the recap is important b/c before you can think about which villains will show up in the third film, you have to figure out what it will be in broad terms. Only then can you uncover who the villains will be.
That's why people who say "I think X, Y , and Z should be in the next film" are looking at things on a superficial level. Before you can even mention the villains you need to first state what you think the film will be about in broad terms.
This is the wrong premise to base a Batman 3 story on. He already struggled with this issue in TDK. He thought about giving up Batman b/c innocents were dying and he wanted Dent to be his successor. <br />
<br />
Not only is his girl gone but he's forced to take on the crimes of Dent. But more importantly he stretched the limits of his integrity when he saved the Joker, someone who has no redeeming qualities and can't be rehabilitated. Like it or not, he's fully committed to being Batman now and his act of compassion towards the Joker, which in effect defeated the Joker since he didn't become corrupted, has pushed him beyond the hero point into something much more. <br />
<br />
After the events of TDK any reexamination of Wayne wanting to give up Batman will be redundant. <br />
<br />
The more interesting issue is whether he will struggle to be Bruce Wayne anymore. Why should he be? He's a fully formed Batman now, becoming more than a hero and his one hope for a normal life, Rachel Dawes, is dead. So why should he go on being Bruce Wayne?