World Is this movie keeping in smallville continuity?

Raimi did a great job of capturing human emotions. My ex got all watery eyed in SM2 when Aunt May was talking to Peter, then again my ex was a *** ***** *** ****.
 
charl_huntress said:
Are we? You seem to have some very negative views about how things will play. I can understand concerns, but...idk...it just seems like your are not a fan of innovation. Yet, you continually harp on STAS being the best version of Supes ever...and Bruce Timm took so many liberties (and IMO callous disregard) with Supes that I'm not sure where you stand.

I agree. It's all in execution, but to be open to any sort of innovative execution you have to be open minded. Maybe I haven't been here long enough, but you don't seem to be very open minded.

Wow..... :confused:

Just wow, you must be new cause you've totally got me wrong.

Trust me, I've even been banned for advocating SR and promoting it in other forums. I'm a fan of how the picture is shaping up.

I just wasnt a fan of AICN's nonsense and doubt the validity of their statements.

And I dont recall saying STAS was the best version ever? It definately was on Television.....

But my hope is holding out that SR will be the best ever.
 
Kane said:
Wow..... :confused:

Just wow, you must be new cause you've totally got me wrong.

Trust me, I've even been banned for advocating SR and promoting it in other forums. I'm a fan of how the picture is shaping up.

I just wasnt a fan of AICN's nonsense and doubt the validity of their statements.

I am new. The date says it all. I'm just going on the few things I've read from you lately. Be assured...I'm not going to re-read all of your posts to find out. I just wanted to know because I, obviously, wasn't sure.
 
Ya.. you over-reacted majorly yesterday.

Believe me, if I hated SR.....I wouldnt be coming on here practically every day; that wouldnt be very logical.

We're on the same page.
 
wow....so everyone thought he was talking about them(including me). we must have a guilty conscience or something....
 
there are a few more then who do not have a logical POV about posting constantly about a project you have no emotional investment in.
 
The Incredible Hulk said:
for someone who who apparently dislikes SV so, you spend an AWFUL lot of time cavorting in the forums over there.....

Hulk, I don't hate Smallville, I would just like To see My Favorite Iconic characters LOIS LANE, CLARK KENT, & LEX LUTHOR be given The Respect they deserve .

I want to see Clark in more SUPERMAN Mythology bound episodes that will show me this boy will Become The Man He's DESTINED to become .

I want to see Lois get more involed in episodes that will bring her to The Journalism world. Where we see her become The iconic Top Ace Reporter for The Daily Planet .

I want to see Lex become THE SOB he's DESTINED to become, I want to see him in METROPOLIS beginining to build his EMPIRE LexCorp before the arrival of SUPERMAN.

I want to see a change in the direction of The show, from focusing on Teen love life of Clark's {that's DESTINED to fail} To more solid Mythology bound episodes .
 
fangrl06 said:
Raimi did a great job of capturing human emotions. My ex got all watery eyed in SM2 when Aunt May was talking to Peter, then again my ex was a *** ***** *** ****.

Oh that scene... yeah two good actors with too good performances. that was actually great, but imagine that scene but as a entire movie instead of just the one scenea and that's what I think singer does.

I tentatively take back what I said about raimi being the better action director. from the clips and trailers I've seen frame by frame, this movie will top all superhero movies currently out in the action department. :up: it just has to. It's superman.
 
fangrl06 said:
Who is this 'Desk'? I hear people bash him a lot.

I wouldn't say bash, he plays his broken record, people either respond to the attention bait or just point out how redundant his "critisms" really are.
 
Wesyeed said:
Oh that scene... yeah two good actors with too good performances. that was actually great, but imagine that scene but as a entire movie instead of just the one scenea and that's what I think singer does.

I tentatively take back what I said about raimi being the better action director. from the clips and trailers I've seen frame by frame, this movie will top all superhero movies currently out in the action department. :up: it just has to. It's superman.
What about the train scene? Name a single action scene better than that. If there is one it would be GG and SM final battle in SM1 (because of the emotions).
 
Kane said:
Ya.. you over-reacted majorly yesterday.

Believe me, if I hated SR.....I wouldnt be coming on here practically every day; that wouldnt be very logical.

We're on the same page.

Really...did I:confused:

You read that entire thread again, and see how it's possible that I over-reacted. You didn't seem to be on the side of romance, and it was implied (though you didn't state it directly) that there was some soft-core porn elements to the notion of romance in a Superman movie. I mean, why else post that in that thread instead of the caption thread? It seemed to me that you were trying to hint that everyone who wants to see that wants soft-corn porn in Superman. Forgive me if I was wrong and I did take things too far; however, I have yet to read anything positive about this movie from you. And...remember I haven't been here that long.

Most of your post are on and on about things you don't even know will happen. Like I said...I could be wrong, and I could have misread somethings...but...well...let's just leave it at that.
 
charl_huntress said:
Really...did I:confused:

You read that entire thread again, and see how it's possible that I over-reacted. You didn't seem to be on the side of romance, and it was implied (though you didn't state it directly) that there was some soft-core porn element to the notion of romance in a Superman movie. I mean, why else post that in that thread instead of the caption thread? It seemed to be that you were trying to hint that everyone who would want to see that wants soft-corn porn in Superman. Forgive me if I was wrong and I did take things too far. However, I have yet to read anything positive about this movie from you.

Most of your post are on and on about things you don't even know will happen. Like I said...I could be wrong, and I could have misread somethings...but...well...let's just leave it at that.
damn.....you're very.....passionate.
 
charl_huntress said:
Really...did I:confused:

You read that entire thread again, and see how it's possible that I over-reacted. You didn't seem to be on the side of romance, and it was implied (though you didn't state it directly) that there was some soft-core porn element to the notion of romance in a Superman movie. I mean, why else post that in that thread instead of the caption thread? It seemed to be that you were trying to hint that everyone who would want to see that wants soft-corn porn in Superman. Forgive me if I was wrong and I did take things too far. However, I have yet to read anything positive about this movie from you.
.

No. Wow you missed it entirely.

I said I dont want Sexploitation in a Superman film, theres a difference between that and Romance. Romance is fine if done in a classy, tasteful way.

Sexploitation is like (eg; Lana turning into a sexual charged lesbian-kissing vampire in Smallville or Lois Lane stripping for ratings).

Thats the stuff I dont like.... that isnt romance and thats what I was refering to.
 
Kane said:
No. Wow you missed it entirely.

I said I dont want Sexploitation in a Superman film, theres a difference between that and Romance. Romance is fine if done in a classy, tasteful way.

Sexploitation is like (eg; Lana turning into a sexual charged lesbian-kissing vampire in Smallville or Lois Lane stripping for ratings).

Thats the stuff I dont like.... that isnt romance and thats what I was refering to.
SV went wayyy down hill in season 4.
 
fangrl06 said:
damn.....you're very.....passionate.

Always an eternally...there is no other way to live life except passionately...though this doesn't apply to the MBs. I was just a little heated from that dang pic:)
 
charl_huntress said:
Always an eternally...there is no other way to live life except passionately...though this doesn't apply to the MBs. I was just a little heated from that dang pic:)
lol....what pic?
 
Kane said:
No. Wow you missed it entirely.

I said I dont want Sexploitation in a Superman film, theres a difference between that and Romance. Romance is fine if done in a classy, tasteful way.

Right, and I agree. But, you didn't state that. You just showed a picture of Superman with hoes hanging on his feet and his big schlonger of a gun...obviously hinting at what he can do.

Believe me, I don't want Superman exploited sexually, but the love that he feels and the human like passion that inspires it is not something to be mocked...at least I don't think so.

As you can probably guess, I found that picture highly offensive to Superman and the notion of Superman having romantic love. I just hate people trying to portray it that way, and that was what it seemed you were trying to do.

Kane said:
Sexploitation is like (eg; Lana turning into a sexual charged lesbian-kissing vampire in Smallville or Lois Lane stripping for ratings).

Thats the stuff I dont like.... that isnt romance and thats what I was refering to.

Sexploitation is different from romantic love, and I know we agree on that, so I'm feel better. However, you haven't even seen a HINT of that in SR. I could see if some SV stuff was being shown, but it's all been pretty tame. It seems to me you are afraid that the romantic nature of the love between Lois and Clark/Superman will overshadow all other elements. Yet, you haven't even seen anything that supports that.

It's just getting a little crazy, and please in the future. Post those nasty pics of Supes in the caption thread where I will be sure to find some humor in them. I didn't find any humor in that pic when posted in a thread that questions whether there is too much intimacy or not enough in a Superman Returns.
 
lol umm...that pic was in no way designed to insult romance...

It was designed to insult 'sexploitation'

It was friggin Superman as Orgasmo. If youve seen that film, u'd get the joke.

And yes, I DID state I dont have a problem w romance if done in a classy way...and I hate sexploitation....

I said that in that thread, I guess you missed it.
 
Kane said:
lol umm...that pic was in no way designed to insult romance...

It was designed to insult 'sexploitation'

It was friggin Superman as Orgasmo. If youve seen that film, u'd get the joke.

And yes, I DID state I dont have a problem w romance if done in a classy way...and I hate sexploitation....

I said that in that thread, I guess you missed it.

Not familiar with Orgasmo...not really trying to be either. But thanks for the heads up.

I did read that you don't have a problem with romance. It just seems that from reading a few of your other post in other threads that I didn't replay too...you obviously have a hard time distingishing the difference.

Whatever...not worth going into any longer. I just thought you should know what my original gripe was all about.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
200,554
Messages
21,759,187
Members
45,594
Latest member
evilAIS
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"