It's just disappointing that from the man who helped write memorable villains such as Alonzo Harris, could bungle with a character like the Joker.
Honestly I
I think for every moment like this
[YT]2KcpeG5Q39Q[/YT]
[YT]9bZf7XhlKls[/YT]
there should be a moment like this:
[YT]rVuEivvaIUE[/YT]
[YT]https://youtu.be/dXsDi0D7bao[/YT]
as a counterpoint. Joker should have been severely reworked in order to work. Even if he was just a cameo, if done right, he could have been the most memorable and anticipated part of the movie/sequels. But maybe under another director or actor(if David does come back, it should be back to the drawing board and rework with other writers).
Well said, I enjoyed reading that, not sure if you wrote it or not, and watching the vids. Man, B:TAS was so great!
Yeah, I don't feel his Joker is irredeemable for the future, and I actually appreciated it a little more when I watched the film a second time.
In theory, if it was executed really well, I think it was a great idea to have Joker play a small role in the film, and not be the main villain or main character. If executed well. I'm not a Tarantino fanboy, but I respect and appreciate him, and he hasn't done a boring film, but I'm thinking a Tarantino approach would've worked well for a story and characters like Suicide Squad
I'm trying to think of a good example of a character in a film who only had small role, couple scenes, but completely stole the show. Kinda like Alec Baldwin in Glengarry Glen Ross, or something like Harvey Keitel or Christopher Walken in Pulp Fiction, but I know there's better examples than that. But maybe have Joker play a key role in a plot point in the middle of the movie, don't show him much if at all early on in flashbacks, don't put him in much of the trailers or advertising, leave a certain mystery or mystique to the character, so when he shows up he has people's attention and leaves them wanting more. Like, if Ledger's Joker only showed up for fifteen minutes in a film prior to Dark Knight, people would be talking, and couldn't wait for the next installment when he's featured more heavily.
And I think Leto could've pulled that off with the right script, dialouge, and motivations. Like, how they did the first trailer, barely revealing him at the end, people were intrigued, couldn't wait to see more. And the little glimpses, like him with the tuxedo and machine gun, lying in the circle of knives (which turned out to be kinda pointless) and being all manic and crazy in the car, all of that was spot on Joker. They just spoiled it with cheesy dialouge and randomness and weirdness just to show how crazy he is. Ledger's Joker was crazy but his motivations made sense,?abd he struck the perfect balance between psychotic and funny, with just a touch of goofiness. Leto's Joker tried to go all out on the crazy and it was just too much, like adding too much salt to a meal or too much sugar into Kool Aid