MadVillainy
C'mon Son
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2008
- Messages
- 32,733
- Reaction score
- 9,402
- Points
- 103
agreed.
Justice League 2 or Justice League 3 needs to be an adaptation of "Justice".
![]()
If the studio removes the more unnecessary characters and streamlines the story a little bit (Mostly the pacing and the ending), this would be a fantastic movie.
That is so true, it is mostly Marvel that has the problem of their heroes removing their masks to show the actors face. Even the bad guys do that.I think DC has been good with people removing their masks. In BB and TDK i dont rmember, but Im 99% sure Bruce didnt remove his mask. Same wth GL I think and then of course with Superman it doesn't matter
Justice League 2 or Justice League 3 needs to be an adaptation of "Justice".
![]()
If the studio removes the more unnecessary characters and streamlines the story a little bit (Mostly the pacing and the ending), this would be a fantastic movie.
I could see, sort of like [BLACKOUT]Justice[/BLACKOUT], the bad guy you think is the main bad guy (or bad guys) is actually being controlled by someone or something else behind the scenes, like Starro. Imagine if Lex Luther leads the Injustice League against the JLA. Its a big epic thing, Earth shattering event. He will bring together for the first time the bad guys who will destroy the JLA and he will lead them all. In the end they are all under the control of Starro who also takes control of Superman and maybe others. Maybe Batman is the only one who is free and has to stop the rest of the JLA and snap them out of it in time to save the day.I don't know how well it would go over with the audience but I would like to see Starro as the baddie in a JL movie and have Superman be under it's control for a good part of the movie.
Evil Superman beating the crap out of everyone = win.
So we've arrived at "They should fight EVERYONE". Heh. I think that's a testament to the stength of th JLA concept. That they have so many powerful enemies and possibilities.
While the idea of a Legion of Doom/Injustice Gang/Crime Syndicate storyline is awesome, I don't think it would end up terribly satisfying. There just wouldn't be enough screentime to do all the characters justice.
I think "aliens" are kind of what the JLA does. The idea that they, themselves are aliens who people might reasonably fear or misunderstand, who nontheless protect against worse threats, intrigues me. Just because Marvel is featuring an alien invasion in The Avengers doesn't mean that using a godlike alien wouldn't work well.
I don't see Starro making for a very interesting main villain. I don't really want villains who are mind controlled, I want villains who are motivated. Starro was actually a cameo in the JL: MORTAL script at the end. Sort of their first "threat" as a new league.
In my opinion, things like Starro, Amazo and even the concept of the Legion of Doom or The Injustice Gang, should be background or supporting elements in a Justice League franchise. Not main threats.
Main threats are characters like:
Darkseid
Vandal Savage
Lex Luthor
Mongul
Despero
I think "aliens" are kind of what the JLA does. The idea that they, themselves are aliens who people might reasonably fear or misunderstand, who nontheless protect against worse threats, intrigues me. Just because Marvel is featuring an alien invasion in The Avengers doesn't mean that using a godlike alien wouldn't work well.
The problem is, the whole premise needs to be centered on paranoia and mistrust of superheroes. This is a *bad idea for a JLA movie*. They are the JLA, not the X-Men.
i say they are mistrusted and its not til they become the league that people trust them
OK I'm confused. WB/DC want to do JLA as a launching point for solo films, but Synder said Henry Cavill won't be Superman in a JLA film. Is Snyder's Superman in a separate universe like Nolan's?
ExactlyThe New 52 started the JLA in Paranoia and Mistrust. I think DC would be happy to have the movie tie into the comic.
The Paranoia would probably only last the 1st 3rd of the movie, the 2nd being the team getting together and fighting the main conflict, the 3rd being the public loving them as they save the day. Just like in the New 52 comic, but with OMACs instead of Darksied.
So like New 52 there are heroes, Green Lantern, Flash, Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman, Aquaman, etc. And the public doesn't know what to do with them. There is a lack of trust. Rumors that Superman is an alien, that Batman is a demon or not human, etc. the Government makes the OMACs and they could be like the Manhunters from GL, robots who follow orders too well and begin taking over. The JLA must stop them and save the day, as they start doing this more and more as a team the media is covering it and the public starts to like them. as they fight in the final conflict at the end of the film the public is in full support of the heroes who are going to save the day. When they do save the day, like in New 52, the media is all over them, and the White House gives them a special awards ceremony thingy to introduce them to the public as a team and they could like in the New 52 have to run off to save the day again (maybe from Starro).
Those are not the heroes I grew up watching. If they can't be trusted before they're a team, then they needed to put leashes when they become one.
Supposedly, WW and Flash would've spun off JLM when that was going to be made. As for now, who really knows? I think it's safe to assume a JLA film will have nothing to do with Snyder's Superman and especially Nolan's Batman if they ever make one. It's not like they are building towards it or creating hype for it.
What's funny is how one of the arguments against JLM was that solo films had to happen first, but word is that you don't have to see the solo films to enjoy Avengers as a film. It stands well enough on its own.