Heretic
Avenger
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2003
- Messages
- 12,484
- Reaction score
- 428
- Points
- 73
I never stated that and everyone can back me up that I never stated that. The ONLY time he was violent was when he had to stop the Kryptonians from putting people in risk of danger and death. And he struggled with killing even Zod, I find it so odd people are acting like he didn't struggle - it took him a good 30 seconds for him to decide what to do. He didn't just up and killed him, you could see it was the HARDEST thing in the world for him to do. But knew he had no other choice so he made the heroic action of tainting himself with an emotional scar that won't leave over letting Zod put other lives in risk of danger and death.
He was a good man from the very START. That is what I stated. Him putting others ahead of himself always by having the instinct of saving people and holding himself back. With Zod, he couldn't - Zod was far from over. So, he had to do the thing Zod least expected. It was his only choice. You grab Zod and fly out - Zod would break free and go back to his killing spree. Without the Kents, child Clark might have accidentally killed someone if he fought back against the bullies since he didn't know his own strength. He held back from those bullies and saved Pete because of what the Kents instilled in him. His instincts were telling him to fight back against the bullies because he could easily take them on, his moral compass instilled by the Kents had Clark resist from doing so.
SMALLVILLE captures perfectly what I see as the possible Clark Kent without having the Kents there to guide him and much more deranged parental figure.
So...in the end...when Zod was all that remained...you think his goal was a killing spree? That Superman was trying to stop a killing spree? That's weird...since Zod specifically said that his only reason for living at that point was to kill Superman...who chose to fight it out in Metropolis...and in fact, when the fight went to space, for some unknown reason the fight then returned to practically the same block they just leveled...a very odd thing to do considering the movement of the planet etc.
That's the thing...Superman's greatest weakness is not Kryptonite...it is his morality. While a bad guy is beating on him, he is trying to save people. In your mind, Zod should have been trying to continue his killing spree, so he should have been so distracted that Superman could have beaten him easily.
You are right though...in this movie the Kents were shown to have taught Clark to restrain his powers, keep his powers secret. That was their point, as opposed to giving him his morality. We are just supposed to assume their great morality because it's Superman, so of course. In fact, Clark seems moral in spite of the Kents, who tried to talk him out of saving people several times.
